| Quote: | |  | |
| Apart from slightly objecting to the patronising tone ("please learn to merge posts") when i think most people do, is it not the norm to merge posts only when they are on the same general line of argument within the thread. If they are about two different streams, aren't they permitted to be seperate?
(re the patroninsing tone, there is also the point that the second response arrived whilst the first reponse was being typed, so a little more latitude and less attitude (see what i did there ) might be in order) | |
| | |
I do think a nice little explanation as to how to do it would have been nice.
| Quote: | | | |
| I actually agree with the moderator there. There is no reason to post your answers in 2 different consecutive posts.
If you wish to adress two different people on the same thread on 2 different topics, you can simply multi-quote those people you wish to adress and make everything clean.
Even Ashishshah learnt how to multi-quote, so anyone can do it 
Keeps databases, conversations, and threads organized and clean. | |
| | |
True.
| Quote: | | | |
| What's this "Multiquote" that you speak of? | |
| | |
No fxxxxxx clue.
| Quote: | | | |
| Then I apologise without reservation 
Still didn't need the sarcasm though as the point still holds that one can be posting a reply to one post whilst the other is arriving too | |
| | |
Well done and yup.