| Quote: | |  | |
| also how come the victim of abusive companies (overcharging or inventing contracts) have courts rule that they must pay without hearing both sides of the case, and if the victim wants to fight it they must pay the court money. seems odd that the victim always pays, and often the system favors companies. | |
| | |
I would be most interested to see any example of a court decision that demanded payment from a plaintiff without an opportunity being given to hear arguments from both sides.