I said I wasn't going to join this one, but here goes

I pretty much agree with Lob's comments. Maybe they wanted to fill up 82 minutes of footage which is why they included all those conflicting eyewitness reports. I think it would have been better served if they focused more on some questions which are REALLY tough to answer. For example:

• The engines of a 757 are made of titanium alloy, why were they never found embedded in the pentagon, or even the holes that they would have punched in the walls.
• Why did number 7 world trade center collapse, even though it wasn't near the other towers? Anyone who watches it going down could see that it was a controlled explosion. The problem here is, if it were a controlled explosion, then it could not have been set up in just a couple of hours.

There's plenty more, but for me these are the biggest two biggest points which the debunkers should have the hardest time answering. If these two points stick, surely the others should then be considered with a little more merit rather than being discarded?

Of course it seems impossible that such secrets could be hidden from the public. Until of course you sit back and think about the sheet scale of the lies that have been told to the public since 9/11. What about the clearly falsified intelligence on Iraq (and the whole Plame/Libby/Cheney thing), the illegal and systematic wiretaps on American citizens on their own soil, the interception of all financial transfers worldwide via the collection of SWIFT messages (including Swiss transactions). Then let's not forget the failure to explain the suspected kidnapping and "rendition" of suspects in foreign lands.

The point is that this administration has been caught out for all sorts of stuff, what about the stuff we don't know about?

Points I found a bit much in the film:

• The explanation of where all the passengers disappeared to
• The fact that cell phone communication from a plane is impossible (I believe that it is)
• The molten metal found at the base of the twin towers (you can see the collapse came from the top, not the bottom as was the case with number 7)

I also believed that the explosions coming from the lower floors of the towers as they collapsed could have been a pressure wave from the pancaking effect happening on the floors above.

But you have to admit - for one tower to fall was unexpected - a "fluke", for the second tower to fall is also just too interesting to be ignored. And for a third, unrelated tower (number 7) to fall so perfectly with no apparent damage just takes the cake!