View Single Post
  #5  
Old 18.08.2006, 12:23
Lob's Avatar
Lob Lob is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: -
Posts: 8,436
Groaned at 49 Times in 44 Posts
Thanked 1,973 Times in 1,060 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Lob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 9/11 - nearly 5 years on

The explosions shown as WTC1 and 2 went down - would you expect a more widespread expression of pressure within the building? To the layperson (me), it really looked like the explosions were seemingly in key areas. This leaves me with shadows of doubt.....but the reported explosions heard by NYFB personnel could be related to the stress and strain of the aftermath of the impact. Nothing conclusive then....

Fahrenheit 9/11 also touches on one of the few aircraft allowed to remain airborne - that containing IIRC Saudis allegedly related to Usama bin Laden. Timing stinks - but then again, it's hearsay - is there proof of this happening.

Economic reasons irk me somewhat; the dollar today is weak, the US carriers are struggling (and after the recent UK arrests and action, possibly more). The cost to invade Iraq and the fact that the US forces are embroiled in the situation within the country has ensured that billions upon billions of dollars have been spend on this problem.

The US upper house has blocked some attempts by GWB to effectively remove and curtail the first and second and perhaps fourth amendments; Guantanamo bay has been said to be unconstitutional and I believe the majority of the US population has had enough of him.

So if it was a conspiracy, what was the medium- and long-term aim? You have to ask yourself that.....
Reply With Quote