View Single Post
  #16  
Old 18.08.2006, 13:49
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
The Architect
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Zollikon, Switzerland
Posts: 3,182
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 418 Times in 115 Posts
mark has a reputation beyond reputemark has a reputation beyond reputemark has a reputation beyond reputemark has a reputation beyond reputemark has a reputation beyond reputemark has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 9/11 - nearly 5 years on

Quote:
If you're interested in finding some rebuttals to these questions, Popular Mechanics has an article in answer to some of these questions:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=1&c=y

Sen. John McCain prefaces some of these articles. Why a magazine like PM is answering these instead of the Fed Gov, I haven't a clue. Perhaps the editorial and board of PM magazine is closely knit with the M.O.D. (D for disinformation).
I also ended up on their site looking for rebuttals. What really did it for me was that the SUM TOTAL of their rebuttal for the "where is the wreckage" question for the Pentagon was to point out the single piece of wreckage (also the one shown in the film) and to say something like "there you go...". Probably the weakest rebuttal I could think of. After that I figured that it wasn't a serious attempt at a rebuttal and kept looking.

I would seriously like to hear some serious rebuttals to the more serious points (no point in rebutting the stuff which was a bit questionable to begin with).

I gave the film to Stu, was hoping he'd join in with some rebuttals/research.
Reply With Quote