|  | | | 
27.02.2010, 14:15
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO was St Prex, VD
Posts: 2,030
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 1,163 Times in 681 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | Same reason you keep ignoring the fact people choose smoking establishments over non-smoking ones. Non smokers want a smoke free environment, so decided everyone must have a smoke free environment, whether they want it or not, where's the choice? | | | | | Exactly, couildn't have said it better my self.
Which facts are we ignoring?
Just curious.
I have been living in a world where I didn't have a choice of a non-smoking environment for decades. (About 4 to be more precise.) To quote you, where is the choice in this situation?
Unless drug addicts are told no, they tend to do what ever they feel regardless of the feelings or opinions of others. Why is your choice so much more important than mine? It is legal to want to breathe clean air and said clean air hasn't been shown to make people sick. The same cannot be said of cigarette smoke.
I see that you have ignored the decades of good will that have been shown to smokers before the ban. This must be a case of selective perception because smokers have had these same decades to come to a socially acceptable compromise with the non-smokers and they have failed to do so time and time again.
You smokers weren't interested in compromise when you didn't have to because you had the law on your side. Why are you suddenly so interested in compromising now that the law clearly supports the other side? Or to put it slightly differently, why is the tyrannical exercise of a right on the part of smokers so acceptable and when the non-smokers exercise a right in a similar tyrannical fashion it is so objectionable?
As many have said, you have only yourselves to blame.
Brian.
__________________ Many men, of course, became extremely rich, but this was perfectly natural, and nothing to be ashamed of, because no one was really poor -- at least no one worth speaking of. - Douglas Adams | 
27.02.2010, 14:21
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CH
Posts: 10,134
Groaned at 559 Times in 416 Posts
Thanked 19,729 Times in 6,626 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | I have been living in a world where I didn't have a choice of a non-smoking environment for decades. (About 4 to be more precise.) | | | | | | | This user would like to thank Dougal's Breakfast for this useful post: | | 
27.02.2010, 19:26
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: around Basel
Posts: 1,222
Groaned at 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thanked 1,497 Times in 645 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
you mean like | | This user would like to thank ullainga for this useful post: | | 
27.02.2010, 20:14
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Glattbrugg
Posts: 9,720
Groaned at 138 Times in 97 Posts
Thanked 5,075 Times in 2,981 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | you mean like  | | | | |
Up to now, it was the NONsmoking majority which was sitting outside like this and often
- was refused service
- was not even allowed to use the infrastructure outside
got the lousiest service on earth
it will be interesting to see how it will develop in the future. On many nice days I will support the smokers in their quest for reasonable service outside
| | This user would like to thank Wollishofener for this useful post: | | 
28.02.2010, 10:15
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Basel
Posts: 779
Groaned at 15 Times in 13 Posts
Thanked 716 Times in 352 Posts
| | | Man jailed for flouting non-smoking ban | 
28.02.2010, 15:50
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO was St Prex, VD
Posts: 2,030
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 1,163 Times in 681 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | Up to now, it was the NONsmoking majority which was sitting outside like this and often
- was refused service
- was not even allowed to use the infrastructure outside
got the lousiest service on earth
it will be interesting to see how it will develop in the future. On many nice days I will support the smokers in their quest for reasonable service outside | | | | | Don't forget even if you sat outside you would find people sitting next to you and wafting their smoke over towards you. I find it startling that so many smokers want to smoke so badly and yet don't want to sit in their own smoke and would rather fan it towards a family with a small child rather than breathe their own poison.
Anyone who thinks that dining alfresco is synonymous with non-smoking is living in a dream world of denial and doesn't even begin to understand the problems that we who are allergic or medically sensitive to smoke have to deal with on a daily basis. It has also been my observation that people who denied the lack of non-smoking areas don't actually care about others as long as they don't perceive themselves as being inconvenienced.
Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins.
Brian.
__________________ Many men, of course, became extremely rich, but this was perfectly natural, and nothing to be ashamed of, because no one was really poor -- at least no one worth speaking of. - Douglas Adams | 
15.03.2010, 13:23
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Zürich
Posts: 2,880
Groaned at 26 Times in 22 Posts
Thanked 1,418 Times in 860 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
According to 20Minutes around 60 Baiz, restaurants & bars in Basel have turned themselves into smoking clubs. Usually membership costs around 10 francs. Seems to be legal so long as they only allow members to enter?
Last edited by marton; 15.03.2010 at 13:23.
Reason: added Basel
| 
15.03.2010, 13:55
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Hinwil ZH
Posts: 118
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 28 Times in 21 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
I cant wait for this ban to come into effect. Let them have their own little private smoking clubs, that's fine by me. I believe that most of the popular bars and restaurants will do just fine, and will be nicer places to attend and for the staff to work in as well.
The smokers will get over it or even maybe give it up!!!!
| | This user would like to thank swissrob for this useful post: | | 
15.03.2010, 14:05
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Geneva
Posts: 1,191
Groaned at 17 Times in 13 Posts
Thanked 1,714 Times in 753 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
One year from now smokers will be sarcastically shrugging off the existence of these establishments and saying that smoking pubs don't really exist in any substantial manner. And they'll be right. It's my hope that they'll notice some parallels between their situation and the situation of non-smokers now, but that's wishful thinking.
| 
15.03.2010, 15:13
| | Newbie 1st class | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Zürich
Posts: 11
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
Thank god for this! I am a smoker but hate coming home smelling like a raped prostitute every evening.
| 
15.03.2010, 15:24
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Bern
Posts: 601
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanked 231 Times in 125 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | Thank god for this! I am a smoker but hate coming home smelling like a raped prostitute every evening. | | | | | Yes that sounds very pleasant...
| 
16.03.2010, 18:43
| | Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Bäch
Posts: 155
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 81 Times in 31 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 Please, please, I hope this goes through...someone told me it might not! After 30 years of cleaning smoker's teeth, I would at least like to eat without the stench....:-)) | 
16.03.2010, 20:27
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Glattbrugg
Posts: 9,720
Groaned at 138 Times in 97 Posts
Thanked 5,075 Times in 2,981 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | Please, please, I hope this goes through...someone told me it might not! After 30 years of cleaning smoker's teeth, I would at least like to eat without the stench....:-)) | | | | | It has gone through and is definite. It however does not mean that smokers stop smoking. Outside and in the fumoirs and at home they can smoke as much as they want. I am very sorry, but not so much will change.
| 
17.03.2010, 07:40
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Affoltern am Albis, Zurich
Posts: 1,815
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 294 Times in 234 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | It has gone through and is definite. It however does not mean that smokers stop smoking. Outside and in the fumoirs and at home they can smoke as much as they want. I am very sorry, but not so much will change. | | | | | No I think a lot will change. I can go out for the evening/afternoon and not come home stinking like an ashtray, or even worse with F'd up sinuses that leads to a cold......
| 
17.03.2010, 08:03
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Glattbrugg
Posts: 9,720
Groaned at 138 Times in 97 Posts
Thanked 5,075 Times in 2,981 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | No I think a lot will change. I can go out for the evening/afternoon and not come home stinking like an ashtray, or even worse with F'd up sinuses that leads to a cold...... | | | | | "Susan57" is a dentist, confronted with that aspect, and for her, unlike us not so much will change upon the date as the smokers will not give up smoking
| 
17.03.2010, 08:22
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Züri Oberland
Posts: 4,895
Groaned at 233 Times in 155 Posts
Thanked 4,608 Times in 1,769 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | "Susan57" is a dentist, confronted with that aspect, and for her, unlike us not so much will change upon the date as the smokers will not give up smoking | | | | | Sadly a dentist with only one patient, or at least one who is a smoker. But he or she is at least a faithful customer of 30 years standing... | Quote: |  | | | After 30 years of cleaning smoker's teeth | | | | | | | The following 2 users would like to thank AbFab for this useful post: | | 
17.03.2010, 13:59
| | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: NA
Posts: 545
Groaned at 34 Times in 27 Posts
Thanked 590 Times in 267 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | Fail to see how this is a moral self righteous issue. | | | | | | Quote: | |  | | | You smokers lost, move on.
Right makes might | | | | | See what you did there?
| 
17.03.2010, 14:11
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Basel, stein AG
Posts: 253
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 76 Times in 40 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
As a smoker (though in the process of quitting) I am actually pleased about the ban.. I too hate smelling like smoke, and cannot stand having other persons smoke blown in my face. I do not smoke inside of restaurants even though they can, and never around the trains as there are always so many people there, and I hate when I have to walk by smokers right in front of the entrance of a train.. It's hard for me right now as I try not to smoke, and am around it everywhere, so YAY on the ban.. A soon non~smoker that supports it!
| 
23.03.2010, 20:57
|  | Member | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Zurich
Posts: 190
Groaned at 7 Times in 5 Posts
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010
Smoking does not define a personality. Everyone here is talking about smokers as representing a character. Respecting the other is not related to smoking. You respect or not respect your fellow human being regardless of what you choose to do with your health.
Yes, I am a smoker (or at least I was until 5 days ago) but nevertheless, I do not like the fact that I stink after a night out in the club but I also do not like to be bothered by noisy people or noisy children (although I love children) when I am out having nice dinner. I also don't like to smell all sorts of aromas/garlic in a tram. I don't like to be eating in a restaurant where next to me there's a dog and I can go on with a lot of other things...but I do not complain or ask for a ban or become grumpy because of that.
Just bear it and move on. We don't have to like everything that's out there but surely we can live with a lot of it.
Yes yes I know - I have upset many of you and you will say that smoking affects your health whereas the rest do not but I dare to disagree. When noise pollution or any other staff is bothering me, that is affecting my internal peace and harmony and you are definitely affecting my wellbeing  .
So just as smokers are bearing you - non smokers- with all your flaws, be respectful enough to bear their flaws and live with it.
If you want to be respected, start with yourself and respect the smokers.
ps - I don't mind the smoking ban...
| | This user would like to thank aa_248 for this useful post: | | | This user groans at aa_248 for this post: | | 
23.03.2010, 21:31
| | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: UK
Posts: 1,002
Groaned at 109 Times in 65 Posts
Thanked 348 Times in 226 Posts
| | | Re: Smoking bans to be effective 1st May 2010 | Quote: | |  | | | Smoking does not define a personality. Everyone here is talking about smokers as representing a character. Respecting the other is not related to smoking. You respect or not respect your fellow human being regardless of what you choose to do with your health.
Yes, I am a smoker (or at least I was until 5 days ago) but nevertheless, I do not like the fact that I stink after a night out in the club but I also do not like to be bothered by noisy people or noisy children (although I love children) when I am out having nice dinner. I also don't like to smell all sorts of aromas/garlic in a tram. I don't like to be eating in a restaurant where next to me there's a dog and I can go on with a lot of other things...but I do not complain or ask for a ban or become grumpy because of that.
Just bear it and move on. We don't have to like everything that's out there but surely we can live with a lot of it.
Yes yes I know - I have upset many of you and you will say that smoking affects your health whereas the rest do not but I dare to disagree. When noise pollution or any other staff is bothering me, that is affecting my internal peace and harmony and you are definitely affecting my wellbeing .
So just as smokers are bearing you - non smokers- with all your flaws, be respectful enough to bear their flaws and live with it.
If you want to be respected, start with yourself and respect the smokers.
ps - I don't mind the smoking ban... | | | | | Noisy people can be annoying, and dogs in restaurants , I don't agree with.
But last I checked garlic/aromas never caused lung cancer and other health problems. So your argument is quite lame. I have no respect for the action of smoking, doesn't mean I am not friends with smokers.
| | The following 3 users would like to thank rrs for this useful post: | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:18. | |