| Quote: | |  | |
| Imagine then that in both instances you stop and look both ways to see if there is any traffic that would hinder your safely crossing (either in a car or on foot). That would take speed out of the equation.
I'm really not trying to be argumentative. It's just something that popped into my mind as I was reading through this thread. I am at times an over-thinker. But that is a luxury I can afford with all the time I spend stopped at red lights and little red men on empty streets.  | |
| | |
In that case, I agree with:
| Quote: | |  | |
| <snip> ...but there's a huge difference in terms of safety.<snip> | |
| | |
| Quote: | |  | |
| <snip> The main point is that (car) jumping a red light is far riskier for all, than (pedestrian) crossing at red.<snip> | |
| | |
So the impact - pardon the pun - of a mistake is greater in a car.
Although I still think visibility is worse in a car than when standing on the side of the road. For starters you are further away from the action (distance from you to road in terms of length of bonnet, visibility with A-pillars, etc.). I drive a big car and when turning corners and especially when a pedestrian crossing is involved, I actively lean forward to make sure there is nothing in my "forward" blind spot... that is, a person could easily be hidden behing my A-pillar if the angle is right (or wrong, depending on where you are standing!)

.