|  | | | 
20.07.2009, 16:56
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Kt. Glarus
Posts: 2,962
Groaned at 24 Times in 23 Posts
Thanked 5,753 Times in 1,953 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | One tenet of gender bias is that womens' bodies are weak and defective and cannot be trusted to do what they are supposed to do. Little wonder, then, that the foundation of obstetrics is that obstetricians are needed to rescue babies from their mother's bodies. Little wonder too that obstetric remedies rarely involve the mother's actions but are things done to her. If you see the mother as the problem, you don't see her as the solution." (http://www.hencigoer.com/betterbirth/intro/) | | | | | If your obstetrician took that view, you might have a point.
Fortunately most of them (even the male ones  ) don't.
| 
20.07.2009, 17:15
| | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Geneva
Posts: 767
Groaned at 7 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 372 Times in 218 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | If your obstetrician took that view, you might have a point.
Fortunately most of them (even the male ones ) don't. | | | | | Yes, they did, not that it matters that much, I do not think that my personal experience is in any way exceptional. But I have hammered this point enough times and now rest my case.
| 
20.07.2009, 18:10
| | | | Re: Help - avoiding induction?
I have been told from a doctor, who's family contains many gynaecologists, that male gynaecologists either love women or hate them-that there is no in-between. It's rather freaky thought. How would a man feel to be told by woman that she understood his hormones and reproductive organs better than he because she had a diploma? I think that if women didn't intuitively second guess their doctors and get a second opinion there might be a lot more lawsuits. It recently almost cost me my life. But granted we certainly don't want to go back to the days of my great grandmother who did 'laying-in and laying out'!
| 
20.07.2009, 18:25
| | | | Re: Help - avoiding induction?
Page 189 Midwives of 17th century London How men learned obstetrics from women and I guess are still learning. | Quote: |  | | | 1724 John Maubury M.D. men could easily learn midwifery from well-experienced women if they were “more docile and not such obstinate creatures” | | | | | http://books.google.com/books?id=y8J...esult&resnum=2 | 
20.07.2009, 18:56
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: ZH
Posts: 5,764
Groaned at 43 Times in 37 Posts
Thanked 6,668 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | Simply by stopping to look at them as gods and arming yourself with knowledge:
"Obstetrician-gynecologists are surgical specialists in the pathology of women's reproductive organs. The typical obstetrician is trained to view pregnant and laboring women as a series of potential problems despite the fact that pregnancy and childbirth are normal physiologic processes that are no more likely to go seriously wrong than, say, digestion. Obstetric belief tends to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. It has been said that a healthy person is someone who hasn't undergone enough testing by specialists.
Obstetricians work within the medical model, a model that says drugs and procedures are the answer to whatever goes wrong. However, labor difficulties usually resolve themselves with tincture of time or simple remedies. Sterner, riskier measures are rarely required.
Obstetricians are also influenced by the broader culture in which it is believed that technology is superior to nature and machines are more reliable than people. This explains why they will not back off from technologies that have proven to be failures except to replace them with the next new and untested expensive technology that comes down the road. It also explains why not intervening has the burden of proving itself rather than the other way around.
Finally, until recently nearly all obstetricians were male, and even today, women obstetricians train in curriculums devised by and mostly supervised by men. This means gender bias permeates the system as indeed, it permeates all of medicine, only here all the patients are women, which intensifies its effects.
One tenet of gender bias is that womens' bodies are weak and defective and cannot be trusted to do what they are supposed to do. Little wonder, then, that the foundation of obstetrics is that obstetricians are needed to rescue babies from their mother's bodies. Little wonder too that obstetric remedies rarely involve the mother's actions but are things done to her. If you see the mother as the problem, you don't see her as the solution." (http://www.hencigoer.com/betterbirth/intro/) | | | | | | Quote: | |  | | | Yes, they did, not that it matters that much, I do not think that my personal experience is in any way exceptional. But I have hammered this point enough times and now rest my case. | | | | | I am guessing if you had a bad experience with a crap midwife it explains your choice of article to dig up. I would seriously recommend next time you change your midwife or doctor or whomever it was.
| 
20.07.2009, 22:42
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Near Zug
Posts: 3,184
Groaned at 13 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 1,554 Times in 954 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | All of my children were born past their due dates...all larger than average, and all posterior. I would not recommend induction on a posterior positioned baby...it's not fun... | | | | | This is off topic, but did you ever try to turn your posterior babies? I found a website called www.spinningbabies.com and I am wondering if it is worth a try. My second one is also posterior now.
| 
20.07.2009, 23:05
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Near Zug
Posts: 3,184
Groaned at 13 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 1,554 Times in 954 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | What is clearly wrong is assuming that every pregnancy and childbirth is risky and dangerous and then applying medical interventions appropriate for women and babies with serious health problems to perfectly healthy women.
Even clinical studies support the view that a healthy woman with low-risk pregnancy will be far better off at home accompanied by a midwife than if she goes to hospital and lets doctors intervene to deliver her baby for her. | | | | | Low risk pregnancy doesn't necessarily mean a low-risk delivery. I was someone that wanted a homebirth beforehand. My son was perfectly fine being monitored during contractions when I was overdue. On the delivery day the heartbeat slowed down to dangerous levels. Waters were broken and it was green so they took him out ASAP. He was grey, not breathing and needed all the gunk sucking out of his lungs. During labour only a midwife was present apart from the doctor popping in 3 times. The midwife had her hand on the emergency button most of the time, telling me to turn and lie on different sides, standing up and crouching seemed to make the heartbeat slow right down, and I thought the midwife was really risking it not pressing that emergency button. We couldn't find the heartbeat a few times before she finally pressed the button. Had I not been in a hospital I doubt my son wouldn't have made it.
Then I bled way too much finding out later that the placenta wasn't fully removed (about 2/3 was left). A couple of friends have needed manual placenta removals to stop the bleeding too. I believe that a hospital is the safest place to give birth.
| | The following 3 users would like to thank MarieZug for this useful post: | | 
21.07.2009, 08:50
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Zürich
Posts: 612
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanked 206 Times in 129 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | This is off topic, but did you ever try to turn your posterior babies? I found a website called www.spinningbabies.com and I am wondering if it is worth a try. My second one is also posterior now. | | | | | Marie, I would think carefully about this... it is very painful for both mother and babies and can often result in immediate need of intervention.
A friend of mine with posterior baby was going to try and then somehow her gut told her not to and it turned out baby had cord wrapped around her neck and that was the reason for not turning... a manoeuver like that could have caused serious harm.
Have you tried acupuncture? Yoga? Moxibustion? I find these are all much gentler methods
Cheers,
K
| | This user would like to thank kri for this useful post: | | 
21.07.2009, 11:51
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Near Zug
Posts: 3,184
Groaned at 13 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 1,554 Times in 954 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | Simply by stopping to look at them as gods and arming yourself with knowledge:
"Obstetrician-gynecologists are surgical specialists in the pathology of women's reproductive organs. The typical obstetrician is trained to view pregnant and laboring women as a series of potential problems despite the fact that pregnancy and childbirth are normal physiologic processes that are no more likely to go seriously wrong than, say, digestion. Obstetric belief tends to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. It has been said that a healthy person is someone who hasn't undergone enough testing by specialists.
Obstetricians work within the medical model, a model that says drugs and procedures are the answer to whatever goes wrong. However, labor difficulties usually resolve themselves with tincture of time or simple remedies. Sterner, riskier measures are rarely required.
Obstetricians are also influenced by the broader culture in which it is believed that technology is superior to nature and machines are more reliable than people. This explains why they will not back off from technologies that have proven to be failures except to replace them with the next new and untested expensive technology that comes down the road. It also explains why not intervening has the burden of proving itself rather than the other way around.
Finally, until recently nearly all obstetricians were male, and even today, women obstetricians train in curriculums devised by and mostly supervised by men. This means gender bias permeates the system as indeed, it permeates all of medicine, only here all the patients are women, which intensifies its effects.
One tenet of gender bias is that womens' bodies are weak and defective and cannot be trusted to do what they are supposed to do. Little wonder, then, that the foundation of obstetrics is that obstetricians are needed to rescue babies from their mother's bodies. Little wonder too that obstetric remedies rarely involve the mother's actions but are things done to her. If you see the mother as the problem, you don't see her as the solution." (http://www.hencigoer.com/betterbirth/intro/) | | | | | You are quoting someone trying to sell their book. Even they go on to say: "Start small when intervention becomes necessary. " No doctor goes straight to the operating theatre when things go wrong. Checks are made, and the minimum intervention that is needed is used.
In Switzerland at my hospital, the midwives are the only people that attend a normal delivery, continuous electronic fetal monitoring is only used during induction, episiotomy is only given for non-normal presentations or assisted deliveries and epidurals weren't even mentioned with me.
| 
21.07.2009, 16:21
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Zurich
Posts: 233
Groaned at 5 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction?
so has it come out yet??
| | This user would like to thank AlZurich for this useful post: | | 
21.07.2009, 20:24
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: From one side of lake Zurich to the other...
Posts: 3,429
Groaned at 10 Times in 7 Posts
Thanked 1,992 Times in 1,082 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction?
On the posterior question, all mine (3) were posterior...my only suggestion would be to avoid induction if possible - the baby needs to turn before they move down... if you have ARM this is going to 'speed up' the process but might not give the baby the same chance of turning as they move through...with posterior, my experience is that you are likely to go late, with long prelabour and backpain...make sure you don't go into labour dehydrated and eat/drink a bit just in case (don't starve) - assume it's going to be a long labour, not a short one...
And my second one was significantly smaller and easier to birth than the first...and after a lot of intervention, I ended up pushing him out in under 10 minutes with no compllications....  You never can tell... | | This user would like to thank swisspea for this useful post: | | 
22.07.2009, 12:44
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,106
Groaned at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanked 1,928 Times in 924 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction?
My sister is a midwife in the maternity unit at the RIE so I asked her about this, this was her reply: | Quote: |  | | | Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha LoL!!!!!! NO!!!!!!
No extra babies born, that just happens all the time! and NEVER any extra staff on! I think I will try putting it to the bosses as a new bit of research from Switzerland though to see if it works in getting the extra staff!!! | | | | | Sorry Al. | Quote: | |  | | | The Royal Infirmary in Edinburgh state that more women go into labour during Full Moon and I believe they always had extra staffing for this period. Maybe other Edinburgers on the Forum can confirm. But yes it's true. | | | | | | | This user would like to thank Lou for this useful post: | | 
22.07.2009, 13:08
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Near Zug
Posts: 3,184
Groaned at 13 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 1,554 Times in 954 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | ..with posterior, my experience is that you are likely to go late, with long prelabour and backpain...make sure you don't go into labour dehydrated and eat/drink a bit just in case (don't starve) - assume it's going to be a long labour, not a short one...
And my second one was significantly smaller and easier to birth than the first...and after a lot of intervention, I ended up pushing him out in under 10 minutes with no compllications.... You never can tell...  | | | | | Well done with 3 posterior labours. With my first I had terrible back pain and was puking after every contraction. Induction wasn't fun, with my first contractions 1 min apart. What worked for you at easing back pain during labour? In the birth preparation classes they taught us massage that didn't work at all for the back pain.
| 
22.07.2009, 13:53
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,907
Groaned at 63 Times in 56 Posts
Thanked 3,623 Times in 1,773 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | I am guessing if you had a bad experience with a crap midwife it explains your choice of article to dig up. I would seriously recommend next time you change your midwife or doctor or whomever it was. | | | | | My in-law family has two midwives and these both entertain some pretty scary opinions on science, technology and the state of the world in general that involve a mixture of wild conspiracy theories with esoterics and a bit of astrology. I once got into an argument with one who claimed that it didn't matter when babies died in childbirth as this was necessary for their karma and next reincarnation, and that if science tried to save too many babies who oughtn't be saved, it was negatively offseting the karma balance of the entire planet. In fact, science was a product of evil spirits who has created these technologies for precisely that purpose. I though this a rather irresponsinle attitude for a midfife. I don't know whether this is widespread in that profession or these are one-off cases. But I suppose that as long as they do their work well, other things shouldn't really matter.
| 
22.07.2009, 14:04
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: ZH
Posts: 5,764
Groaned at 43 Times in 37 Posts
Thanked 6,668 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | My in-law family has two midwives and these both entertain some pretty scary opinions on science, technology and the state of the world in general that involve a mixture of wild conspiracy theories with esoterics and a bit of astrology. I once got into an argument with one who claimed that it didn't matter when babies died in childbirth as this was necessary for their karma and next reincarnation, and that if science tried to save too many babies who oughtn't be saved, it was negatively offseting the karma balance of the entire planet. In fact, science was a product of evil spirits who has created these technologies for precisely that purpose. I though this a rather irresponsinle attitude for a midfife. I don't know whether this is widespread in that profession or these are one-off cases. But I suppose that as long as they do their work well, other things shouldn't really matter. | | | | | Maybe they had been exposed to a bit too much of the gas and air pipe at all those births they had attended... | 
22.07.2009, 14:29
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Baden region
Posts: 1,797
Groaned at 10 Times in 9 Posts
Thanked 1,554 Times in 734 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction? | Quote: | |  | | | so has it come out yet?? | | | | | methinks shes in hospital guys..
we may not get a report for a while, til things settle at home.
good luck nettle, grab sleep when you can!
| 
30.07.2009, 20:53
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Lausanne / Weybridge UK
Posts: 592
Groaned at 10 Times in 5 Posts
Thanked 241 Times in 166 Posts
| | | Re: Help - avoiding induction?
Is anyone in contact Nettle and Lavender ? Presumably by now she's a home with her bundle of joy but would love to hear how she is doing.
| |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:41. | |