|  | | 
11.04.2007, 14:17
| | Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Vaud
Posts: 170
Groaned at 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanked 47 Times in 27 Posts
| | | Quick question about pension pillars
hi,
I am using the calculator at http://www.estv.admin.ch/e/dienstlei...rechner/vd.htm
to work out my likely deductions for tax, and in the field marked "Pension fund contribution" the help button says these are "contributions you have made to the second pillar."
I haven't quite got the hang of these yet, are they talking about the contributions I make to my company pension fund?
Thanks
| 
11.04.2007, 14:37
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Kloten
Posts: 2,070
Groaned at 66 Times in 47 Posts
Thanked 847 Times in 486 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
Yes - Works pension = BVG = Pillar 2
FYI:
Pillar 1 = state pension = AHV(ALS in French?)
Pillar 3 = What UBS call "Fisca", voluntary
| 
11.04.2007, 15:50
| | Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Vaud
Posts: 170
Groaned at 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanked 47 Times in 27 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
Thanks for that  am finally getting th hang of this now,
although am still shocked by the difference the 2 calculators I have been using bring up as results!
I guess the credit-suisse one is very much more rough and ready and doesn't take into account the various allowances you have
| 
11.04.2007, 15:59
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Kloten
Posts: 2,070
Groaned at 66 Times in 47 Posts
Thanked 847 Times in 486 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
The estv link is for the full tax return thingy.
Unless you have a C permit or are married to a Swiss person you pay source (or direct) tax "Quellensteuer"
This calculator will give you estimate for this kind of taxation http://212.90.216.117/revenueestimate/mainForm.jsp
Aimed at contractors, but it works well...
| 
11.04.2007, 20:50
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Zürich
Posts: 784
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 293 Times in 200 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | Yes - Works pension = BVG = Pillar 2
FYI:
Pillar 1 = state pension = AHV(ALS in French?)
Pillar 3 = What UBS call "Fisca", voluntary | | | | | Is it really that simple? I sat through a presentation on my works "welcome day" that had us building a model house that was supposed to represent the pension system, and also listened to some spiel from my Relationship Manager at my bank. I remained unenlightened after both.
Why can't finance types explain things in plain language?
| 
12.04.2007, 01:58
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars
Posts: 2,574
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 593 Times in 338 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | Is it really that simple? I sat through a presentation on my works "welcome day" that had us building a model house that was supposed to represent the pension system, and also listened to some spiel from my Relationship Manager at my bank. I remained unenlightened after both.
Why can't finance types explain things in plain language? | | | | | More or less!
Pillars:
1 is 5.05% (x2) of salary to 8900 and 1% above that
2 is company specific but with a sliding scale minimum and maximum
3 is maximum 6365 and voluntary
For pillar 2 if you are below the maximum permitted for your age you can annually top it up which is tax efficient ie deductable.
I guess your house was also taking into account IV gap which is something else.
| 
12.04.2007, 02:00
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars
Posts: 2,574
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 593 Times in 338 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | Unless you have a C permit or are married to a Swiss person you pay source (or direct) tax "Quellensteuer" | | | | | While this is generally true it is not correct. Homeowners and anyone who elects to be taxed not at source as well.
| 
12.04.2007, 08:28
| | Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Vaud
Posts: 170
Groaned at 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanked 47 Times in 27 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
Thanks for all that, although I am being to think the only way I will know what my take home pay is going to be is to wait for my first pay packet!
Which isn't a wonderful plan as I really need to get a fairly accurate idea before I rent out my house in Finland so I know how much leaway I have on the rent I charge
I guess I should be happy that however it is calculated the tax will be significantly less of a burden than it is here in Finland  Where my current BASE rate is 36% and my total stoppages is just under 50% | 
04.05.2007, 08:25
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Appenzell
Posts: 5,904
Groaned at 108 Times in 94 Posts
Thanked 2,195 Times in 1,317 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
Can anyone give me a link to an English guide to pensions (pillars etc) in Zürich from both the employee's and employer's point of view ? I'm trying to do a comparison of total costs employee vs self-employed...
Thanks
David | Quote: | |  | | | More or less!
Pillars:
1 is 5.05% (x2) of salary to 8900 and 1% above that
2 is company specific but with a sliding scale minimum and maximum
3 is maximum 6365 and voluntary
For pillar 2 if you are below the maximum permitted for your age you can annually top it up which is tax efficient ie deductable.
I guess your house was also taking into account IV gap which is something else. | | | | | | 
04.05.2007, 09:48
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: about there
Posts: 3,006
Groaned at 33 Times in 33 Posts
Thanked 2,325 Times in 1,259 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | While this is generally true it is not correct. Homeowners and anyone who elects to be taxed not at source as well. | | | | | I am EU B (5 year) & my wife is on a C, when we married, I stopped paying Quellensteuer & moved onto the traditional Swiss tax model, this happened automatically ... just some more info for the databanks .... | 
07.05.2007, 09:39
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars
Posts: 2,574
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 593 Times in 338 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | Can anyone give me a link to an English guide to pensions (pillars etc) in Zürich from both the employee's and employer's point of view ? I'm trying to do a comparison of total costs employee vs self-employed...
Thanks
David | | | | | Hi Dave,
No I cannot but if you ask specific questions I will provide you some specific answers. I think the key to answering the question for yourself is to understand that the comparison costs of employee vs self employed is easily answer by adding ca 30% to your costs. This should cover all the self-employed additional costs. ie AHV, BVG, ALV, IV, etc.
Richard
| 
07.05.2007, 09:42
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Züri
Posts: 992
Groaned at 17 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 816 Times in 374 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | While this is generally true it is not correct. Homeowners and anyone who elects to be taxed not at source as well. | | | | | Hi Richard,
I have understood that to be the case as well, but when I asked my employer, they tell me that despite being a home owner, over the 120k and doing a yearly tax return, I still need to pay quellensteuer. Anything I can show them to further discuss this?
Thanks!
| 
07.05.2007, 09:47
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Appenzell
Posts: 5,904
Groaned at 108 Times in 94 Posts
Thanked 2,195 Times in 1,317 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
Thanks Richard,
I'll try and frame the question in a more specific way. I am trying to established whether working for a company gives one something that being self-employed doesn't (in terms of pension benefits, tax efficiency or flexibility) in order to justify the overall costs (total of employee and employer) self-employed vs own employee.
I'm not after a complete analysis (without paying for it !), just a pointer would be helpful..
Here are a couple of useful links concerning employer and employee deductions : http://www.svazurich.ch/text/index.c...007&sprache=en http://www.svazurich.ch/text/index.c...ehm&sprache=en
Thanks
dave | Quote: | |  | | | Hi Dave,
No I cannot but if you ask specific questions I will provide you some specific answers. I think the key to answering the question for yourself is to understand that the comparison costs of employee vs self employed is easily answer by adding ca 30% to your costs. This should cover all the self-employed additional costs. ie AHV, BVG, ALV, IV, etc.
Richard | | | | | | 
07.05.2007, 10:09
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars
Posts: 2,574
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 593 Times in 338 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | Hi Richard,
I have understood that to be the case as well, but when I asked my employer, they tell me that despite being a home owner, over the 120k and doing a yearly tax return, I still need to pay quellensteuer. Anything I can show them to further discuss this?
Thanks! | | | | | Go to the local Gemeinde and ask for confirmation that you no longer fall under quellensteuer. Ultimately it is the responsibility of the Gemeinde to provide the letter you take to your employer to demonstrate this. Usually this is a C permit but not always. Anything else you actually need to ask for...
| 
07.05.2007, 10:24
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars
Posts: 2,574
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 593 Times in 338 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars | Quote: | |  | | | Thanks Richard,
I'll try and frame the question in a more specific way. I am trying to established whether working for a company gives one something that being self-employed doesn't (in terms of pension benefits, tax efficiency or flexibility) in order to justify the overall costs (total of employee and employer) self-employed vs own employee.
I'm not after a complete analysis (without paying for it !), just a pointer would be helpful..
Here are a couple of useful links concerning employer and employee deductions : http://www.svazurich.ch/text/index.c...007&sprache=en http://www.svazurich.ch/text/index.c...ehm&sprache=en
Thanks
dave | | | | | Okay Dave,
first off you need to understand that there are several ways that you can become "self-employed" although in reality there is only one. Contradiction? Read on.
To be self employed you need to go to the Gemeinde and fill in the AHV self-employed form. At this point you are self-employed and you can (indeed usually must) register your business in the company register. Then you can send out invoices etc. You are freed of the necessity to pay unemployment insurance and can elect to have no pension in which case your income increases substantially along with your tax bill. You can offset many things against your tax though such as part of your accommodation costs to cover a work place at home, your car costs, your computer, telephone etc. But at the end of the day it is still not very tax efficient. An improvement okay but it can be better.
Your ability to accumulate reserves is the major stumbling block and that you are taxed annually on total income with various opportunities missed.
This is the reason many self-employed people want to form their own GmbH. You are then employed but you yourself, within the restrictions imposed by law, determine what you spend the company income on. The key is to understand that your employment costs remain more or less the same as if you were "self-employed" ie AHV, tax etc but now only on your personal income. You do now have to pay ALV 2% but of your income not the company's.
So you could say bill at 150 per hour giving you ca 300K per year total income. You pay yourself 10K per month and this leaves ca 150K per annum. From the 150K you can run a company car usable by all company employees (ie you) save for next year, deduct for all things imaginable and whatever is left you can pay yourself as winnings - subject to tax but not everything else. Furthermore you are able to pay into a pension fund 2nd pillar up to the legal maximum and additionally have a 3rd pillar. You can send yourself on training courses at will and not just specific to your current occupation without needing to demonstrate their relevance. And all this because you are working for a business and not for yourself. The fact that you are the sole owner of the business is more or less irrelevant as legally it is its own person.
Downsides are the necessity to have your books audited but then again if you earn enough you will need to do this as a sole trader as well. You also have the currently ca 13K you need to invest to set it up - A lot of this can be done by pledging your car to the company if you own one. The final downside is the requirement to formally wind up the company once you are finished with it which is a bind but hey you cannot have everything...
Put simply you are much more flexible in what you can do with a GmbH in terms of optimising your tax bill and covering your existence going forward.
| | This user would like to thank Richard for this useful post: | | 
07.05.2007, 10:30
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Appenzell
Posts: 5,904
Groaned at 108 Times in 94 Posts
Thanked 2,195 Times in 1,317 Posts
| | | Re: Quick question about pension pillars
Richard,
Many thanks for that excellent and detailed answer. I suspected that there must be some major gains in the company route, and seperation of company revenue from personal income was it.
Many thanks
dave | Quote: | |  | | | Okay Dave,
first off you need to understand that there are several ways that you can become "self-employed" although in reality there is only one. Contradiction? Read on.
To be self employed you need to go to the Gemeinde and fill in the AHV self-employed form. At this point you are self-employed and you can (indeed usually must) register your business in the company register. Then you can send out invoices etc. You are freed of the necessity to pay unemployment insurance and can elect to have no pension in which case your income increases substantially along with your tax bill. You can offset many things against your tax though such as part of your accommodation costs to cover a work place at home, your car costs, your computer, telephone etc. But at the end of the day it is still not very tax efficient. An improvement okay but it can be better.
Your ability to accumulate reserves is the major stumbling block and that you are taxed annually on total income with various opportunities missed.
This is the reason many self-employed people want to form their own GmbH. You are then employed but you yourself, within the restrictions imposed by law, determine what you spend the company income on. The key is to understand that your employment costs remain more or less the same as if you were "self-employed" ie AHV, tax etc but now only on your personal income. You do now have to pay ALV 2% but of your income not the company's.
So you could say bill at 150 per hour giving you ca 300K per year total income. You pay yourself 10K per month and this leaves ca 150K per annum. From the 150K you can run a company car usable by all company employees (ie you) save for next year, deduct for all things imaginable and whatever is left you can pay yourself as winnings - subject to tax but not everything else. Furthermore you are able to pay into a pension fund 2nd pillar up to the legal maximum and additionally have a 3rd pillar. You can send yourself on training courses at will and not just specific to your current occupation without needing to demonstrate their relevance. And all this because you are working for a business and not for yourself. The fact that you are the sole owner of the business is more or less irrelevant as legally it is its own person.
Downsides are the necessity to have your books audited but then again if you earn enough you will need to do this as a sole trader as well. You also have the currently ca 13K you need to invest to set it up - A lot of this can be done by pledging your car to the company if you own one. The final downside is the requirement to formally wind up the company once you are finished with it which is a bind but hey you cannot have everything...
Put simply you are much more flexible in what you can do with a GmbH in terms of optimising your tax bill and covering your existence going forward. | | | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:42. | |