| Quote: | |  | |
| Risotto shouldn't really be wet or dry - it should be creamy in consistency. | |
| | |
Oh D**n, I'm using my own shorthand again...
Neither the "wet" or "dry" versions are incorrectly cooked (i.e. overcooked or swimming in stock). The terms "dry" and "wet" refer to how creamy the risotto should be, the "wet" risotto is somewhat more "creamier" than the "dry" risotto (
and this is a subjective assessment...).
My family have always preferred a slightly "drier" risotto.
In regards to pouring in some stock and letting it cook, you don't drown the rice, just add enough to cover and then - at the end - finish off the traditional way (and-and-stir) and you won't get either an overcooked or soupy risotto.
As I said, it take practice to get right, but it can be a helpful approach when you have to cook a risotto and do something else at the same time.
However I must confess, since I've become serious about cooking, I've abandoned my non-stick pans and now cook risotto the traditional way...