Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > General off-topic
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02.06.2016, 20:59
Sbrinz's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Murten - Morat
Posts: 10,978
Groaned at 542 Times in 342 Posts
Thanked 10,580 Times in 5,412 Posts
Sbrinz has a reputation beyond reputeSbrinz has a reputation beyond reputeSbrinz has a reputation beyond reputeSbrinz has a reputation beyond reputeSbrinz has a reputation beyond reputeSbrinz has a reputation beyond repute
UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-y...shire-35385227

Sexual risk orders were introduced in England and Wales in March 2015 and can be applied to any individual who the police
believe poses a risk of causing sexual harm, even if they have never been convicted of a crime.

Last edited by Sbrinz; 03.06.2016 at 06:10.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02.06.2016, 22:08
Dougal's Breakfast's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GL
Posts: 15,407
Groaned at 969 Times in 737 Posts
Thanked 38,718 Times in 12,117 Posts
Dougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

I think it's appalling.

What happened to things like, you know, evidence, a fair trial, innocent until proven guilty?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02.06.2016, 22:12
RufusB's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: In my head. And UK. Ex-Basel.
Posts: 1,519
Groaned at 33 Times in 32 Posts
Thanked 1,991 Times in 852 Posts
RufusB has a reputation beyond reputeRufusB has a reputation beyond reputeRufusB has a reputation beyond reputeRufusB has a reputation beyond reputeRufusB has a reputation beyond reputeRufusB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Surely it's also a breach of privacy (?) for any potential partner of his? Is this a new "law"? The article doesn't say if it's for a set period of time, either. Presumably this can't be enforced forever.


Plus, actually, who would know?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03.06.2016, 01:53
curley's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winterthur
Posts: 664
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 670 Times in 372 Posts
curley has an excellent reputationcurley has an excellent reputationcurley has an excellent reputationcurley has an excellent reputation
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Quote:
View Post
It would seem that after a lady failed to make a rape accusation stick, the judge ordered the accused man to inform the police before he intended having sex again, and he must supply her name, address and date of birth.

That'll learn him! http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-y...shire-35385227

Sexual risk orders were introduced in England and Wales in March 2015 and can be applied to any individual who the police
believe poses a risk of causing sexual harm, even if they have never been convicted of a crime.

It seems like a good idea to me, it would never be allowed here, too much invasion of privacy.
It wouldn't be allowed here for darn good reason. She couldn't make the accusation stick? He's proofed guilty or he is not. What kind of judge is that I wonder?!

Quote:
View Post
I think it's appalling.

What happened to things like, you know, evidence, a fair trial, innocent until proven guilty?
agreed, 100%. Worse, apparantly he was proven innocent. Even if it were "aus Mangel an Beweisen", acquittal is acquittal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03.06.2016, 03:23
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 6,611
Groaned at 188 Times in 147 Posts
Thanked 10,975 Times in 4,534 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Quote:
View Post
I think it's appalling.

What happened to things like, you know, evidence, a fair trial, innocent until proven guilty?
100%. What's the point of a trial if the judge ignores the outcome?
Quote:
View Post
Worse, apparantly he was proven innocent.
No, he wasn't. He was found not guilty. That's not the same as "proven innocent".
Quote:
View Post
... the result must be beyond reasonable doubt...
Yeah, funny, that. Would you prefer a conviction with considerable doubt? "I hereby accuse Sbrinz of every unsolved murder"... "You've got someone we can blame? Excellent! Guilty! String 'im up!"
Quote:
View Post
This is a good idea, if he makes any trouble with anyone in future, he knows he will go to jail for 5 years.
This is a truly ridiculous idea. "I hereby accuse Sbrinz of every unsolved murder"... "We've tried him and found him not guilty, based on reasonable doubt of his guilt. But I don't like the look of him, so string 'im up anyway!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03.06.2016, 07:19
Dougal's Breakfast's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GL
Posts: 15,407
Groaned at 969 Times in 737 Posts
Thanked 38,718 Times in 12,117 Posts
Dougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond reputeDougal's Breakfast has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Bit of a cowardly edit there, Sbrinz.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03.06.2016, 08:42
Belgianmum's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Was Belgium now Neuchâtel
Posts: 8,227
Groaned at 60 Times in 57 Posts
Thanked 10,246 Times in 4,929 Posts
Belgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Quote:
View Post
Bit of a cowardly edit there, Sbrinz.
What's the point of editing a post if the original is there in a quote anyway? I don't get it.


And as for the original topic I think it's totally ridiculous. Surely the police have better things to do than take notes on the sex life of somebody who 'might' be a potential rapist but who has never been convicted of anything? Things like catching real criminals who've actually committed a crime.

Last edited by Belgianmum; 03.06.2016 at 12:25.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03.06.2016, 11:43
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 3,059
Groaned at 99 Times in 79 Posts
Thanked 3,803 Times in 1,962 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Quote:
View Post
Surely it's also a breach of privacy (?) for any potential partner of his? Is this a new "law"? The article doesn't say if it's for a set period of time, either. Presumably this can't be enforced forever.


Plus, actually, who would know?
The original order is from december, so probably was for half a year, extended now by another four months.

Just crazy. Minority Report anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03.06.2016, 12:24
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Formerly in Neuchatel
Posts: 2,352
Groaned at 219 Times in 150 Posts
Thanked 3,881 Times in 1,547 Posts
porsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: UK, potential rapist is controlled by pre nuptual (Friday thread??)

Sigh.

It's a civil order so there is no "beyond reasonable doubt" burden of proof. It has little or nothing to do with the fact that this individual was found not guilty of a specific crime. It's eminently possible that facts uncovered during the trial gave a judge cause for concern, while not providing the facts needed to find the person guilty of this specific crime with the high, criminal burden of proof of "beyond reasonable doubt". For a civil action the burden a proof is "on the balance of probability" and it might be possible that the presiding judge would have found him guilty under that burden.

In any case, the parameters of a Sexual Offence Prevention Order are found in law:

The test for imposing a SOPO in cases that have not charged a sexual offence "is it necessary to protect the public or any particular member of the public from serious sexual harm?". The judge, with all the facts at hand, believed it was.

Last edited by porsch1909; 03.06.2016 at 12:43.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rape




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Potential Melanoma covered by insurance? silverburn Insurance 18 08.02.2016 19:57
UK to CH - Potential Job Offer but return to UK at weekends Keyser Sozoe Permits/visas/government 51 02.02.2012 00:11
Tempted by a potential Sister-In-Law Chemmie Jokes/funnies 12 03.01.2011 14:42
Is paperwork needed for taking items back to UK by hired van??? kev330520 Transportation/driving 1 14.05.2009 16:17
Procedures taken by potential employers J-Swiss Employment 10 17.02.2008 16:27


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0