| Quote: | |  | |
| We can agree to disagree. My experience is the opposite to what you have described.
Perhaps one is best advised to read the terms and conditions of their basic health insurance. The law (Bundesgesetz über die Krankenversicherung) sets out the provisions dealing with mandatory health insurance. But it is your insurance policy which will deal with matters of indemnification.
My previous post was merely to inform people that it is better to be upfront and to disclose your prior medical history than to be later inconvenienced when you discover that your health insurer will not provide coverage.
As to the question raised by alanmack, his health insurer is likely to view the broken wrist as a result of an accident, and accidents are not covered by your basic health insurance unless you are not employed at the time of taking out the basic health insurance. If you are employed, your employer will have organised accident insurance for you, which covers accidents both at work and outside of work. If the broken wrist did not occur when an accident policy was in place, then it is unlikely that a current accident insurer will provide coverage for physio in relation to an accident that they are not liable for. | |
| | |
I can agree with your comments about disclosure of previous medical history if it relates to private insurance but
not to the basic Swiss health cover.
For the basic insurance an insurer cannot ask about your medical history and, even if you did decide to disclose it, they cannot refuse you or charge a premium higher than their published rate. If they attempted to do so they should be reported to the insurance
Ombudsman. See this on the
Comparis website (if it comes up in German you can switch it to English).
As you say, the insurers do issue their own policy but they all have to apply the law in an identical manner. See the
Federal Government website which says:
| Quote: |  | |
| Social health insurance is operated by a number of insurers. Only those which meet the conditions set out in Swiss legislation, and which are not profit-making, are authorized to handle social health insurance. They must apply the legal provisions in an identical manner and separate from other insurance (for example, complementary insurance according to by private insurance law). If an insurer becomes insolvent, the cost of its statutory benefits are taken over by a joint body funded by contributions made by the insurers on the basis of their social health insurance premiums. | |
| | |
So, there is no scope for an insurer to issue a policy which does not provide the full benefits. See
Comparis.
In your first post you state:
| Quote: |  | |
| In most instances, a new health insurer will accept most "minor" pre-existing conditions. But for more serious (and expensive) conditions which would not be covered under your basic health insurance, an insurer should be informed of such so they can properly assess their risk, see what coverage is best for you and, if necessary, adjust any premium they wish to charge you. | |
| | |
What serious conditions are not covered by the basis insurance ? There are certain procedures which may not be covered but these tend to be when a more expensive one is available over and above the normal one. For example: Dealing with varicose veins by the traditional surgical method is covered but, treatment by laser is not. (This information was correct in 2006 but may have changed since).
If a doctor proposes any procedure that is not covered by the basic insurance they are required to inform you of this fact.
The example you give of someone having a heart operation and then needing further treatment is not correct.
| Quote: |  | |
| “To take an extreme example, if you had heart surgery 2 years ago and then switch to a different health insurer without disclosing this fact, it is unlikely that your new health insurer will fund future surgery/treatment if related complications occur”. | |
| | |
The new insurer has to pay the bill for any further treatment that may be necessary. For example, if towards the end of the year you have a condition needing treatment such as physiotherapy and on the 1st January you change insurers then the new insurer has to pay the bills from that point on.
With regard to the original question raised by
alanmack, if he had been covered by a Swiss employer at the time of the accident then, as you say, anything relating to it would be their responsibility. However, as he was not, apparently, here when the accident happened it can be dealt with as a medical condition under the basic insurance.
Some more links: Explanation of Swiss health system.
Here and
here.