|  | | 
02.10.2012, 12:04
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 5,938
Groaned at 84 Times in 69 Posts
Thanked 6,725 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Gay "cures" banned in California
For minors anyway. http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/S...#ixzz27w50U7P6 | Quote: |  | | | These practices have no basis in science or medicine and they will now be relegated to the dustbin of quackery | | | | | I assume they'll soon be banning homeopathy for minors as well. | | The following 2 users would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 12:05
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Villars-sur-Glâne, FR
Posts: 5,757
Groaned at 72 Times in 61 Posts
Thanked 8,396 Times in 3,126 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | I assume they'll soon be banning homeopathy for minors as well.  | | | | | One can but hope...
| | The following 3 users would like to thank PaddyG for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 12:10
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Adliswil
Posts: 2,177
Groaned at 156 Times in 106 Posts
Thanked 2,788 Times in 1,286 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California
Good. For all those that think homosexuality is a choice, ask yourself, "When did I choose to be heterosexual?"
| | This user would like to thank Jobsrobertsharpii for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 12:27
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 5,938
Groaned at 84 Times in 69 Posts
Thanked 6,725 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | Good. For all those that think homosexuality is a choice, ask yourself, "When did I choose to be heterosexual?" | | | | | When I was about 12, when I decided that girls weren't icky after all.
Personally, I can't see why sexual orientation is fixed, nor why it should be. Why shouldn't people go from being gay to straight and back again, if that's what they want to do. The whole nature/nurture argument is entirely based on the wrong premise.
The right premise being "be tolerant and kind" rather than seeking justifications or reasons.
| | The following 5 users would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 12:46
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wadi
Posts: 5,473
Groaned at 102 Times in 80 Posts
Thanked 6,286 Times in 2,718 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | When I was about 12, when I decided that girls weren't icky after all.
Personally, I can't see why sexual orientation is fixed, nor why it should be. Why shouldn't people go from being gay to straight and back again, if that's what they want to do.
. | | | | |
That's a very Christian attitude - suggesting that people chose their sexual orientation (and so can change it).
| | This user would like to thank Tom1234 for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 12:55
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 5,938
Groaned at 84 Times in 69 Posts
Thanked 6,725 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | That's a very Christian attitude - suggesting that people chose their sexual orientation (and so can change it). | | | | | You're implying that having a choice predicates morality. So your argument is that people have no choice, therefore it's not wrong. A corollary of that is that if they did have a choice, then they would be doing something wrong.
Which is why I think the argument of nature/nurture is the wrong basis. If it could be conclusively proved that sexual orientation is a choice, then you'd have to find another reason to be accepting. I think people should get into acceptance straight off.
Funny how "Christian attitude" is somehow negative. It used to be a very positive thing.
Oh - and it is a "Christian attitude" in the sense that it is held by someone who considers themselves to be a Christian. But that has nothing to do with my view of choice. I think that came about due to brainwashing by the Essex University Student Union, who had posters in their offices saying "Go on - become a homosexual". Gene Robinson's view that it's all due to nature would also be a Christian attitude, btw.
__________________ If a religion is defined as a system of ideas that contains unprovable statements, then Gödel taught us that maths is not only a religion, it is the only such that can prove itself to be one. Barrow
| 
02.10.2012, 12:56
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Adliswil
Posts: 2,177
Groaned at 156 Times in 106 Posts
Thanked 2,788 Times in 1,286 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | That's a very Christian attitude - suggesting that people chose their sexual orientation (and so can change it). | | | | | Actually there are individuals who are either biologically or hormonally androgynous, and, for them, gender identity (and sexual orientation) MAY be a choice...
| | This user would like to thank Jobsrobertsharpii for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:01
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wadi
Posts: 5,473
Groaned at 102 Times in 80 Posts
Thanked 6,286 Times in 2,718 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | |
Funny how "Christian attitude" is somehow negative. It used to be a very positive thing. 
. | | | | | That's the way of the world. | Quote: | |  | | |
Oh - and it is a "Christian attitude" in the sense that it is held by someone who considers themselves to be a Christian. But that has nothing to do with my view of choice. I think that came about due to brainwashing by the Essex University Student Union, who had posters in their offices saying "Go on - become a homosexual".
| | | | | I'm sure they weren't suggesting that literally | 
02.10.2012, 13:04
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 5,938
Groaned at 84 Times in 69 Posts
Thanked 6,725 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | ...I'm sure they weren't suggesting that literally  | | | | | You never met them!  They had all sorts of weird "right-on" beliefs. They were the mob who became apparatchiks of the Blair government.
| | The following 2 users would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:07
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 5,938
Groaned at 84 Times in 69 Posts
Thanked 6,725 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California
Actually, thinking back on it, in those days - at least in university - being gay was viewed pretty much as a choice that should be free, without censure. It was only in the past few years that popluar opinion has solidified into "being born that way". I wonder where it will go next?
| | This user would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:08
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 4,076
Groaned at 158 Times in 123 Posts
Thanked 4,684 Times in 2,187 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | When I was about 12, when I decided that girls weren't icky after all.
Personally, I can't see why sexual orientation is fixed, nor why it should be. Why shouldn't people go from being gay to straight and back again, if that's what they want to do. The whole nature/nurture argument is entirely based on the wrong premise.
The right premise being "be tolerant and kind" rather than seeking justifications or reasons. | | | | | | Quote: | |  | | | That's a very Christian attitude - suggesting that people chose their sexual orientation (and so can change it). | | | | | I think it's a bit of a push really for people to have to say specifically one way or the other. I'm sure there are people who ONLY are attracted to same or opposite sex, but I'm thinking there also are plenty who are simply attracted to people who attract them, but are (or feel) forced to pick one or the other.
Labels are comfortable though, mostly to others, but sometimes to ourselves as well, so it is understandable that people would say they are either gay or straight, even if they're kinda somewhere in between - a bit like some people out there who claim to be Atheist because they don't believe in religion as opposed to not believing in some force and / or being greater than ourselves. The label helps keep the questions down a bit, helps you know where you stand AND helps others put themselves someplace in relation to you.
So, I do think that some people "decide" - not that they'd otherwise be one or the other, but that they find themselves attracted to "all", and feel the need to choose, for whatever reason. Alas, this time of choice does often come at a time when our hormones are going crazy and we're receiving signals from many sources, so some make the comfortable choice to them, whichever it may be.
Of course, I'm not saying that everyone is like this, I imagine for most it isn't, but I've known one or two people who described it like this for themselves. (Yes, I've had interesting circles of friends in my life.  )
| | The following 3 users would like to thank Peg A for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:26
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 5,938
Groaned at 84 Times in 69 Posts
Thanked 6,725 Times in 2,851 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California
Now, should homeopathy - and other woo stuff that is often promoted from California, if not created there - be banned towards minors as well?
| | The following 2 users would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:30
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Lugano
Posts: 7,990
Groaned at 272 Times in 234 Posts
Thanked 6,650 Times in 3,485 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | Why shouldn't people go from being gay to straight and back again, if that's what they want to do. | | | | | I had a former girlfriend who went from straight, to lesbian for 12 years or so, then back to straight. And she wasn't bi either, when she was straight she was only into guys, and when lesbian only into women.
Tom
| | This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:32
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wadi
Posts: 5,473
Groaned at 102 Times in 80 Posts
Thanked 6,286 Times in 2,718 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | I had a former girlfriend who went from straight, to lesbian for 12 years or so, then back to straight. And she wasn't bi either, when she was straight she was only into guys, and when lesbian only into women.
Tom | | | | | Did she become a lesbian after having to be your girlfriend? | | The following 3 users would like to thank Tom1234 for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 13:38
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Lugano
Posts: 7,990
Groaned at 272 Times in 234 Posts
Thanked 6,650 Times in 3,485 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | Did she become a lesbian after having to be your girlfriend?  | | | | | Actually, no, I met her after she went back to being straight!
Tom
| | This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post: | | 
02.10.2012, 14:10
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Zurich
Posts: 4,968
Groaned at 76 Times in 65 Posts
Thanked 5,434 Times in 2,538 Posts
| | | Re: Gay "cures" banned in California | Quote: | |  | | | You never met them! They had all sorts of weird "right-on" beliefs. They were the mob who became apparatchiks of the Blair government. | | | | | I know the type exactly. A Godwin word comes to mind.
| |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:10. | |