Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10.04.2009, 12:01
Phos's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ZRH
Posts: 4,913
Groaned at 192 Times in 134 Posts
Thanked 3,171 Times in 1,761 Posts
Phos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond repute
What if.... Ron Paul would have won

I'm glad to see Congressman Ron Paul is speaking up. I do believe he has an impact in the public dialog. His points are sobering and should not be marginalized:



What if the American People really did learn the truth?


On the Federal Reserve as the culprit:




On Israel and Hamas:

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10.04.2009, 12:05
jrspet's Avatar
¡snoıʌqo uıɐʇdɐɔ
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quaint Wädenswil, Zürich, CH
Posts: 7,163
Groaned at 28 Times in 23 Posts
Thanked 5,155 Times in 2,921 Posts
jrspet has a reputation beyond reputejrspet has a reputation beyond reputejrspet has a reputation beyond reputejrspet has a reputation beyond reputejrspet has a reputation beyond reputejrspet has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if.... Ron Paul would have won

There'd be more earmarks

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10.04.2009, 12:38
vwild1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: What if.... Ron Paul would have won

Oh Ron Paul...




I understood RuPaul...




Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10.04.2009, 14:21
Texaner's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Zentralschweiz
Posts: 1,335
Groaned at 29 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 1,742 Times in 821 Posts
Texaner has a reputation beyond reputeTexaner has a reputation beyond reputeTexaner has a reputation beyond reputeTexaner has a reputation beyond reputeTexaner has a reputation beyond reputeTexaner has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What if.... Ron Paul would have won

Quote:
View Post
There'd be more earmarks
I think it merits pointing out that "earmarks" – by definition – are not increases in either the budget or spending, as is popularly assumed.

An "earmark" is the directed application of specific funds to a specific purpose from out of a budget total that has already been established. Congressman Paul advocates "earmarks" precisely because without them, unaccountable, unelected bureaucrats often spend budget funds on whatever they want (e.g., expanding, empowering, or enriching whichever bureaucracy they're entrenched in), rather than what will truly benefit the public.

Using "earmarks," Congress maintains at least some control over how the plethora of bloated federal government agencies and departments spend the funds already alloted to them in the budget.
__________________
"After the first glass, you see things as you wish they were..." — Oscar Wilde
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ron paul


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
R.I.P. Paul Newman J.L-P General off-topic 24 29.09.2008 16:01
Paul... Paulette (must see) Scott Jokes/funnies 0 20.08.2008 07:55
The Zurich Ron Paul Stammtisch leylak Social events 8 08.11.2007 15:41
Paul Weller in Amsterdam and Groningen NicM Social events 0 13.07.2007 10:47
Hello All from Paul Paul Douglas Lovell Introductions 5 22.02.2007 13:31


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0