Thanks for bringing this up - another user ( ZDA ) brought it up earlier (
although it was OT to that thread ).
In Malaysia, we have two sets of laws running in parallel - Common Law (
secular criminal and civil ) as well as Shariah Laws.
Sharia Laws do not have jurisdiction over non-Muslims ( who are subjected only to secular law - borrowed from the Brits, Ozzies and Indians ).
The model in question has always been subjected to Shariah Law being a Muslim.
Usually offenders cop a fine and that's the end of it. In this case she has waived her right to appeal the sentence - reasons best known to her.
To me it looks like either:
a) a publicity stunt by to draw international attention to a silly and selective application of shariah law in Malaysia, i.e. "OK cane me, but do it publicly so that the world can see how ridiculous you are".
b) a publicity stunt by the model to raise her own profile. I don't think anyone outside of Malaysia/Singapore had heard much of her before. Now she will have a future after her modelling career as a spokeswoman for say women's rights.
c) she really feels like she should be punished because she did something wrong.
Either way, good on her. She has a unique opportunity to make a change to Malaysia for the better (
my money's on a+b)