| Quote: | |  | |
| I'd hate to groan at someone's intro but I do hope some of the sectarian sentiment expressed there was tongue-in-cheek. I saw enough of it in the old country (being a born and bred Irishman myself) to last a lifetime. | |
| | |
Of course it's tongue in cheek 'Parnell.' England has long been a second home to the Irish and although our intertwining history is a compelling source for debate, discriminating between any two people on grounds of their place of birth, ethnicity, religious beliefs, skin colour etc is wrong. Plain wrong. With no room for exception.
However, I rejoice when I think we have finally see enough water flow under the bridge that we
can talk, tongue-in-cheek about our relationship with Britain in the same offhand manner that the Swiss can talk about 'The Grosse Kanton." I watch British Football every weekend, have Aunts, Uncles and Cousins who have lived there for decades and I have holidayed there a number of times. I read British Papers, watch British TV and feel reasonably well represented by both. This was never a debate about Northern Ireland and I don't think you were attempting to draw me into one. Here, however, is the point I would like to make:
I think that at every juncture there is a place for a person to describe their experiences of their own ethnicity and it is necessary to allow them the freedom to do so. People should be encouraged to examine feelings about their nationality, for example, because in an ever more globalised world those feelings are far more dynamic than ever before and there are interesting debates to be had about how an Irish an Irishman in Toronto feels about his Irishness as compared to an Irishwoman in Perth.
In that debate, I think there is room for humour: I'm Irish, there's
always room for humour.