| Quote: | |  | |
| US patent law is totally different to any other country in the world. They have very strict rules and procedures (partly to do with the sheer size of the place and also the different attitude to the global value of patents and intellectual property along with many other factors). Switzerland tends to follow the European Patent office guidelines but obviously there are always exceptions to the case. Do you have a specific question you need answering as I am happy to help as I work for a Patent department in Basel.
Here's a good link to European Patent Law: http://www.epo.org/patents/One-Stop-Page.html | |
| | |
Spot on. The US patent law arises from the odd confluence of English-type common law (which has a totally different way of legal interpretation from Continental jurisprudence) and the US Constitution. For example, in the USA, unique in the world, a patent is awarded to the first to
invent, not, as everywhere else, the first to file. This introduces a horrendously complex factor into the whole business. Then there's the grace period - in the USA, you can publish your invention in any way (print, oral disclosure, use) and still patent it, provided you file within one year of this first use. However, most of the rest of the world has "absolute novelty", and prior publication in any way wrecks your chances of a patent application.
The USA has made (grudgingly) some changes to its law, to make it a bit more like everyone else's, but is digging in its heels on first-to-file. If the rest of the world accepts a universal grace period, the US will begin to start to commence to think about first-to-file.
Swiss patent law has one oddity - patents are published only on grant, unlike everywhere else (including the USA, heaven help us), where they're published 18 months after first application. This will change.