| Quote: | |  | |
| A little more respect for those train drivers. | |
| | |
Thank you
| Quote: |  | |
| Well what were the conditions of that story? Were there more the 2 rails side by side, was it on a curve, bridge? I mean the other train may have not been informed about there was an accident coming up. While it's a terrible thing that happened, it's not unbelievable that it could happen. | |
| | |
It's a single track. Police agreed with disponents that the line stay open and the trains would pass at a very low speed. All trains should have been instructed to "run on sight", but somehow the accident train never received this order.
The cause was probably botchy communication between disponents (it's rather unusual that a line stays open when there's a suicide).
They tried to blame it on the engineer because he had been late changing his radio to the Austrian channel. But this doesn't make any sense, since a "run on sight" is an instrucation that needs to be protocolled. The train is usually held back before a red signal and the order is dictated to the engineer who needs to read it back and sign it. This obviously didn't happen in this case.