| Quote: | |  | |
| Calling DOT a sub standard is a very difficult topic. ECE and DOT test similiar things but not the same. A helmet may pass the DOT but not the ECE test and vice versa. So which of those is the better? | |
| | |
The ECE. Sorry, but just to explain the difference between the two in simple terms: The DOT test has some ridiculous requirements that have nothing to do with real world accidents while the ECE tests are supposed to model real impacts as good as possible.
In the American test does a small but heavy steel ball get dropped on the helmet from a defined height, which has to withstand the impact. In reality do riders typically hit a flat and rough surface at a high speed... which is a very different sort of impact.
Simple result: I happen to have a BMW helmet, arguably one of the safest models on the planet according to European standards. While BMW does sell it's bikes and other gear in the US, do they not sell helmets there: The same helmet that gets a five star rating in Europe does simply fail the tests.
I read some article in a bike magazine some years back where BMW pretty openly said that they are not interested to make worse helmets in order to pass the US legislation but only sell things they really believe in... one of the reasons why I bought their product actually. (Similar is apparently true for some Schuberth models.)