|  | | 
10.07.2008, 16:16
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Fribourg
Posts: 441
Groaned at 9 Times in 7 Posts
Thanked 61 Times in 42 Posts
| | | HD Sat receiver opinions
Well I now have a very nice Full Hd tv, so I'm thinking that I really should upgrade my Satellite receiver to an HD one.
I'm looking at the Topfield 7710 HSCI and the Humax HDCI 2000, both retail for CHF300. Does anyone have any first hand opinions on either of these?
Nick http://www.microspot.ch:80/microspot...710/detail.jsf http://en.buchmann.ch/catalog/produc...oducts_id=7440 | | This user would like to thank Nickj for this useful post: | | 
11.07.2008, 10:45
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Affoltern am Albis, Zurich
Posts: 1,817
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 294 Times in 234 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
Try reading this: http://www.satellites.co.uk/ebulletin/july08.html
Mentions the Humax is not so goodfor Fringe reception.
| | This user would like to thank szhjcn for this useful post: | | 
11.07.2008, 10:57
| | Banned | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,684
Groaned at 33 Times in 27 Posts
Thanked 1,134 Times in 585 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions | Quote: | |  | | | | | | | | Good thread, I'm in exactly the same situation.
The guys at Highdefinition recommended this, I'd be interested to hear if anybody has any experience with it, specifically running cccam on it.
| 
11.07.2008, 12:34
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Fribourg
Posts: 441
Groaned at 9 Times in 7 Posts
Thanked 61 Times in 42 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
The Vantage looks good and I think they have a reliable reputation but it's a bit out of my price range, once you get up to CHF600 you can start looking at HD receivers with PVR's and time shifting stuff, as I already have a PVR I don't really need this option.
I was in a TV & HiFi shop the other day and they didn't have a good word to say about the Humax (any Humax come to that) which is why I would like some feedback from this thread.
| 
11.07.2008, 12:40
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Appenzell
Posts: 5,904
Groaned at 108 Times in 94 Posts
Thanked 2,195 Times in 1,317 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
I have an Humax HDCI2000, and i am very happy with it. I can't comment on the interesting HD picture quality side of it, because I haven't yet upgraded my TV....but:
a) reliable, crashes max about once a month, kept on standby, restart cures all.
b) Good user interface, clear and almost self explanatory
c) sound quality good.
It does everything I want it to, which is the best recommendation I can give to a piece of equipment....
dave | Quote: | |  | | | | | | | | | | This user would like to thank DaveA for this useful post: | | 
11.07.2008, 12:43
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Affoltern am Albis, Zurich
Posts: 1,817
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 294 Times in 234 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
I'll be watching this carefully as one day I will move to HD satellite. Was thinking of waiting for the UK-FreeSat HD systems with PVR to come out (then wait a while for them to be less buggy).
I have a dreambox PVR which has replaced SKY, but I do miss the EPG.
For now I'm happy watching SD on my old CRT and Blu-Ray's etc.. for things I want with the FULL-HD experience in my cinema room.
| 
11.07.2008, 12:48
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Fribourg
Posts: 441
Groaned at 9 Times in 7 Posts
Thanked 61 Times in 42 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions | Quote: | |  | | | I have an Humax HDCI2000, and i am very happy with it. I can't comment on the interesting HD picture quality side of it, because I haven't yet upgraded my TV....but:
a) reliable, crashes max about once a month, kept on standby, restart cures all.
dave | | | | | Dave,
In sat receiver parlance is crashing once a month deemed reliable? OK if it's just a question of rebooting it then I suppose it's not a big problem.
Thanks for the info
| 
11.07.2008, 12:52
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Appenzell
Posts: 5,904
Groaned at 108 Times in 94 Posts
Thanked 2,195 Times in 1,317 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
They are mass-produced consumer devices, using the cheapest components known to man. They amplify extremely low level signals close to electrically noisy equipment. My Panasonic 31 used to crash every five hours. It was an overheating design fault, and even with my addition of a heatsink upgrade, it was complete ****e.
I am not familiar with any and industrial-strength video-phile equipment on the market, so we are stuck with it...
dave | Quote: | |  | | | Dave,
In sat receiver parlance is crashing once a month deemed reliable? OK if it's just a question of rebooting it then I suppose it's not a big problem.
Thanks for the info | | | | | | 
11.07.2008, 13:05
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Zurich
Posts: 525
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 322 Times in 190 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
Can you use these boxes to receive Sky with premium channels (movies and sports)? We're on our 2nd Sky HD box. The 1st one crashed every day or two, the 2nd one is much better behaved, but it does have a bad sector or something where the recording won't play.
| 
11.07.2008, 13:07
| | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Appenzell
Posts: 5,904
Groaned at 108 Times in 94 Posts
Thanked 2,195 Times in 1,317 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
No. Sky uses proprietary encryption.
dave | Quote: | |  | | | Can you use these boxes to receive Sky with premium channels (movies and sports)? We're on our 2nd Sky HD box. The 1st one crashed every day or two, the 2nd one is much better behaved, but it does have a bad sector or something where the recording won't play. | | | | | | | This user would like to thank DaveA for this useful post: | | 
11.07.2008, 13:21
| | Banned | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,684
Groaned at 33 Times in 27 Posts
Thanked 1,134 Times in 585 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions | Quote: | |  | | | No. Sky uses proprietary encryption.
dave | | | | | You can use them to receive premisum sky channels but using "other methods" rather than a Sky card.
Whilst this works out cheap (in the region of 15 Euro a month for every channel conceivable) your mileage may vary in terms of reliability.
| 
11.07.2008, 13:26
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: -
Posts: 8,436
Groaned at 49 Times in 44 Posts
Thanked 1,973 Times in 1,060 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions | Quote: | |  | | | Can you use these boxes to receive Sky with premium channels (movies and sports)? We're on our 2nd Sky HD box. The 1st one crashed every day or two, the 2nd one is much better behaved, but it does have a bad sector or something where the recording won't play. | | | | | just replace the drive. I just upgraded for a second time from 120Gb to 500Gb. www.skycopyplus.co.uk brought all the contents over.
| | The following 2 users would like to thank Lob for this useful post: | | 
11.07.2008, 13:40
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Zurich
Posts: 525
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 322 Times in 190 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions | Quote: | |  | | | No. Sky uses proprietary encryption.
dave | | | | | That's what I thought, but didn't know if it had changed.
| 
11.07.2008, 17:21
|  | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Zug
Posts: 232
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 55 Times in 41 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions
I also have a Humax HDCI2000. In HD quality it is excellent and the sound via the optical output to my Amp is stunning. All normal channels look much sharper than the Sky box we also have. The HDMI output is also a good thing if you have a decent HD TV.
The only downsides I can see is having to upgrade the firware all the time. They also rarely list the most up to date versions on the Humax site, so you have to search for them on other Sat sites. The other annoying thing is that you have to do this upgrade via a null modem cable or something like that, which only my oldest PC seems to have a Com output to handle it (it is also not that easy so you need some IT skills to get it to work).
Also I notice it seems to get very hot when being used for a short period of time - so make sure it has good ventilation.
For the price, the picture and sound quality it is excellent though.
| 
11.07.2008, 20:56
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Shoppinzentrum
Posts: 1,148
Groaned at 8 Times in 8 Posts
Thanked 393 Times in 272 Posts
| | | Re: HD Sat receiver opinions | Quote: | |  | | | a) reliable, crashes max about once a month, kept on standby, restart cures all. | | | | | Gee, your definition of "reliable" is much different to mine.
I hope that in your work environment you strive for a less-than-once-a-month system crash...
| |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:17. | |