View Single Post
  #35  
Old 22.07.2015, 09:37
Urs Max Urs Max is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 7,200
Groaned at 265 Times in 227 Posts
Thanked 9,315 Times in 4,909 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Iran nuclear talks: 'Historic' agreement struck

Quote:
View Post
When the Iran parliament regularly chants "Death to America" then it is possible this attracts US interest and even stimulates interference.
If Iran were smart they could consider being more secretive about their wishes?
The repeated interfering is at least part of the reason for this type of action. Taking the REaction as reason for additional action is simply <insert pejorative of choice>.

Quote:
View Post
Argue with crazygringo who advocates a shift in American policy from Sunni to Shia. Until 1979 both KSA and Iran were pro U. S.

The US has oil interests in the Gulf. Iran will now be in a stronger position to threaten these interests.
Having an interest doesn't give the right to interfere. Wrong answer.
Reply With Quote