Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
There are some interesting points of view in the WSJ article below. http://www.wsj.com/articles/brexit-a...ion-1466800383 | Quote: |  | | | The EU took a gamble: that the Brits were bluffing and would never vote to leave. A more generous deal—perhaps aimed at allowing the U.K. more control over immigration, the top public concern in Britain—would probably have (just) stopped Brexit. But the absence of a deal sent a clear and crushing message: The EU isn’t interested in reforming, so it is past time to stop pretending otherwise. | | | | | | Quote: |  | | | Deals negotiated through the EU always move at the pace dictated by the most reluctant country. Italy has threatened to derail a trade deal with Australia over a spat about exports of canned tomatoes; a trade deal with Canada was held up after a row about Romanian visas. Brexit wasn’t a call for a Little England. It was an attempt to escape from a Little Europe. | | | | | |