View Single Post
  #5822  
Old 13.10.2016, 16:44
Mikers Mikers is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vaud
Posts: 2,495
Groaned at 149 Times in 102 Posts
Thanked 4,347 Times in 1,667 Posts
Mikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
No it doesn't! I'll repeat again... They omitted the word 'majority'. We can speculate on whether that omission was deliberate or not, and I strongly suspect the former because it's a classic 'get out' clause. There will have been an very expensive team devising the exact and precise wording of the ballot paper, and I'm not inclined to believe this was an oversight on their part. As the wording stands, the government also has to act upon what 48% of the voting populace chose.

Now do you begin to see why the legality of this situation is rocky at best?
If it had been 52-48 the other way round would you have demanded that the government act in the interest of those 48%.

Go on, say it. Say "Why yes I would". because im sure thats what you would would have said.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Mikers for this useful post: