View Single Post
  #46  
Old 28.05.2018, 15:13
Ace1's Avatar
Ace1 Ace1 is offline
A modal singularity
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Morgins, VS (and Alsace)
Posts: 9,247
Groaned at 425 Times in 265 Posts
Thanked 15,884 Times in 6,835 Posts
Ace1 has a reputation beyond reputeAce1 has a reputation beyond reputeAce1 has a reputation beyond reputeAce1 has a reputation beyond reputeAce1 has a reputation beyond reputeAce1 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
View Post

So I am wondering - how does this perception that insurance and higher prices might correlate square with your experiences as a UK pet owner?
Very much. The vets clearly wanted to be able to use all the latest kit, test for everything under the sun, vaccinate against everything whether at risk or not, and it seemed like the increase in rates of insurance really helped top drive this. There would be flyers for insurance in waiting rooms too, which seemed to cynical old me like an obvious attempt to help fuel the trend.

This was back in the 1990s, around the Milton Keynes area, FWIW.

Quote:
View Post
Wouldn't surprise me, but then if you look at this:

"Despite the high costs of treatment, the ABI said an estimated 67% of dogs and 84% of cats were still uninsured."

I wouldn't say that pet insurance is the norm.
Good. I hope, then, that vets are no longer trying to push the unnecessary, expensive tests and treatments that they seemed to be don't back then.

Hah! Fat chance of that.
__________________
http://www.chaletbeauroc.com
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Ace1 for this useful post: