View Single Post
  #15010  
Old 21.11.2018, 08:13
Blueangel's Avatar
Blueangel Blueangel is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 3,889
Groaned at 105 Times in 96 Posts
Thanked 10,610 Times in 4,679 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Plus you can't compare different pension systems as they don't operate in the same way.
You're missing the point.

Membership of the EU is all about meeting the set minimum requirements as set out by the EU. What a country's government chooses to do above and beyond that, is their own concern. FMF made the point that 'why should we supplement poorer countries within the EU when it comes to pensions, but when you look at the report, quite the opposite appears to be the case. It would likely take a serious adjustment in UK spending, for them to reach the minimum level required by the EU. We don't know where that bar would be set, but it's plainly obvious that's the UK could fall short of it.

Imagine if you were on the board of a company that sells private pensions? You're going to fight such a change in government spending tooth and nail as it would massively eat into your profits.
Reply With Quote