View Single Post
  #5  
Old 15.10.2020, 10:18
araqyl's Avatar
araqyl araqyl is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Zurich, West-side
Posts: 1,994
Groaned at 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thanked 1,134 Times in 610 Posts
araqyl has a reputation beyond reputearaqyl has a reputation beyond reputearaqyl has a reputation beyond reputearaqyl has a reputation beyond reputearaqyl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Salt - a carton box for 25 francs

Quote:
View Post
A couple of weeks ago I cancelled my home internet contract with Salt 2 years into it. Awful customer service with long waits and wrong invoices.

So, according to the contract, I had to return the router. According to the contract I signed, section "appareils": "A l’expiration du Contrat, vous devez restituer les appareils non endommagés à Salt dans les trente (30) jours suivant la fin de la durée. Si vous ne restituez pas les appareils, les câbles et les accessoires ou les restituez endommagés, vous devez payer un dédommagement conformément à l’information produit se trouvant sur fiber.salt.ch."

For non-french speakers: "when the contract expires, you have to return the undamaged devices on the 30 days that follow the contract expiration. If you do not return the devices, the cables, and the accessories, or return them damaged, you have to pay a penalty in accordance with the information on the product found in fibre.salt.ch"

So, here I am, happy to change provider and leave this people behind. I go into the store with the router, the cables, and all accessories. In mint condition. Then the guy produces a sheet with the prices (which I could not find in their website) and starts ticking off the returned items, until he reaches "box".

He wants me to return the original box, or pay 25 francs for the lack of it. A carton box for 25 francs.

I point out that nowhere in the contract does it say that I needed to keep and return the carton box. He doesn't care. I insist and he directs me to salt's customer service number, which I call in his presence and after 30 minutes waiting for someone, finally one of the agents answers. He also ignores me, but again I insist that he needed to check the contract that I signed.

His final answer? "a box is a device" (appareil). WTF. And the store agent? "I cannot accept the returned items unless you pay in full the 25 francs; if you decide to not return any of the items, then Salt may force you to pay additional penalties".

I'm tired of big companies ignoring contracts and law, it only applies to them when it is you who has to pay.

FOR NEW PEOPLE ARRIVING INTO SWITZERLAND: AVOID SALT.
Personally, my entire experience with Salt has been and is great. Since I'm happy with their service I haven't had the need to return their gear, apart from when the router was upgraded to some new system - then I simply walked in with the router and power cord in a paper bag, handed them over, and received the new router. Since Swisscom had a similar "must be in the original box" condition when I returned their gear when I switched to Salt a couple of years back, and I had kept the box, I have kept the Salt box on hand.

Checking my (German) contract, it does have the phrase, "in the original packaging" when mentioning returning the bits and bobs on contract termination. The staff in the store were being nice to me when they took the old router back in a paper bag ... but also having checked, I still have the original box for that one as well (currently in use holding silicon moulds for dice).

Sounds more like a problem with the Röstigraben (split between French-speaking/German-speaking Switzerland) than a Salt issue. My local Salt store staff are always amazingly helpful (to the point of offering me deals I didn't know about which save me money on monthly contracts and provide more compared to the service I have asked for) and customer support, both online and on the phone, has been painless and effective.

I would recommend that people use Salt, and not just because it's cheap and fast - at least in my area of Switzerland!
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank araqyl for this useful post: