View Single Post
  #3  
Old 22.11.2020, 16:11
fatmanfilms's Avatar
fatmanfilms fatmanfilms is online now
The Marmite Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Verbier
Posts: 20,995
Groaned at 448 Times in 342 Posts
Thanked 22,264 Times in 11,526 Posts
fatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Raising of maximum allowable ROI on rental property from 0.5 to 2%

Quote:
View Post
Looking at it from a purely business viewpoint, the logic makes sense - nowhere else would you be able to rent an item for 1.75% of its value. But housing is a bit different due to the limited supply, so competition is limited and you could argue it isn't a normal market so pure market rates can't apply.

I can't see how it could be implemented without causing chaos if lots of landlords suddenly try to put rates up that much.

Also perhaps this impact is only because property prices are too high, but the result of this decision is likely to just be even higher prices!
London rents have an appalling net ROI, probably sub 2% but then prices may fall significantly.

It's probably to allow capital values to fall, rather than anything else, most people pay as much as they can in Rent already.

Last edited by fatmanfilms; 22.11.2020 at 16:55. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote