| Quote: | |  | |
| When that baker refused to make a wedding cake for that gay couple, the court decided otherwise.
And in that case the baker didn't have a monopoly so actually the couple could easily have shopped elsewhere for the cake. In Twitter's case, that's not so easy. | |
| | |
It wasn't upheld was it?
I don't personally agree with the bakery but if they don't want certain clients then that is quite literally their business.
Twitter isn't the product. Its users are the product. And this specific user has his own press room. Alternative worldside media channels are available to him.
Twitter has Ts and Cs. They were breached.
Edited as just seen Urs Max's post