View Single Post
  #5  
Old 26.08.2021, 12:09
jim1 jim1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: no longer in the forum
Posts: 190
Groaned at 4 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 173 Times in 90 Posts
jim1 has a reputation beyond reputejim1 has a reputation beyond reputejim1 has a reputation beyond reputejim1 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pillas: Employed vs Independent vs Both

I agree with HVF and would take the same approach as he recommends. Just to point out other differences, the right solution may depend on your personal circumstances

-In 2P your employer pays into the scheme as well as you and the contribution is not normally included in quoted salary figures

-2P may offer generous insurance against death or invalidity, 3P doesn't -but the 2P plan may charge you for this

-If you retire whilst still in a 2P plan you can choose have an annuity at the end (e.g. 5% of saved amount per year for life) which is not possible with 3P. So with 3P you assume the risk of investment return and need to budget accordingly

-2P may be lower return but it is usually also lower risk since backed by an employer and invested in lower risk assets

Another factor is that if you are employed you pay into unemployment insurance and then are entitled to benefits from the insurance scheme if you lose your job
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank jim1 for this useful post: