Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Daily life
View Poll Results: What would you personally prefer to happen?
I want the UK to stay in an ever-closer union 49 23.11%
I want the UK to stay in a loosely connected EU 68 32.08%
I want the UK out because the EU is bad for the UK 22 10.38%
I want the UK out because the EU is a bad thing 23 10.85%
I want the UK out because this would be good for the rest of us 17 8.02%
I don't really care 33 15.57%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4601  
Old 16.08.2016, 20:57
Fowl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Because it's more than made up for by services, which UK exports. This money flow (trade+service) is summed up in the balance of payments.
Yes there is, they require a counterparty. Switzerland has been looking for a partner to negotiate with for almost three years now, and counting.

UK wants access to EEA without FMOP, that doesn't compute. Without free access the economy (in particular the financials) will suffer, and with FMOP it's not what voters voted for. Try sqaring a circle.
The thing is it's all open. Europe is willing to negotiate with the UK because they want part of the UK. Germany and the UK were the only two nations that met all the criteria for the free market, so the UK is a big player. Germany exports a lot to the UK, they will want to maintain that. Switzerland is not such a player. The quote during the referendum was that the overall balance between the UK and Europe is in Europe's favour.

There's also the rest of the world to negotiate with (more than half of the UK trade).

Sure people want to trade with Europe, but it's not the target market anymore. Listen to executives, they target Asia, and America is always a target. Europe as it stands at the moment is not an attractive proposition. The member states are all struggling with several issues.

The UK will always be able to attract business because it's the English speaking access point to Europe. America and Asia are already saying they stay on terms.

FMOP is not a sustainable concept. People move naturally to acquire wealth, they don't move in the opposite direction. Which leads to overcrowding and social issues.

The original idea of the European market for free trade is good, but what Europe has built up politically around it is not acceptable to the masses.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
This user groans at for this post:
  #4602  
Old 16.08.2016, 22:33
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 8,569
Groaned at 246 Times in 212 Posts
Thanked 11,572 Times in 6,319 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
The thing is it's all open. Europe is willing to negotiate with the UK because they want part of the UK. Germany and the UK were the only two nations that met all the criteria for the free market, so the UK is a big player. Germany exports a lot to the UK, they will want to maintain that. Switzerland is not such a player. The quote during the referendum was that the overall balance between the UK and Europe is in Europe's favour.

There's also the rest of the world to negotiate with (more than half of the UK trade).

Sure people want to trade with Europe, but it's not the target market anymore. Listen to executives, they target Asia, and America is always a target. Europe as it stands at the moment is not an attractive proposition. The member states are all struggling with several issues.

The UK will always be able to attract business because it's the English speaking access point to Europe. America and Asia are already saying they stay on terms.

FMOP is not a sustainable concept. People move naturally to acquire wealth, they don't move in the opposite direction. Which leads to overcrowding and social issues.

The original idea of the European market for free trade is good, but what Europe has built up politically around it is not acceptable to the masses.
"Europe is willing to negotiate with the UK" Do you have a source for this?

"There's also the rest of the world to negotiate with (more than half of the UK trade)." But this trade is mostly via the single market EU free trade agreements with the rest of the world which will no longer be available to UK after Brexit.
Reply With Quote
  #4603  
Old 17.08.2016, 00:19
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 8,569
Groaned at 246 Times in 212 Posts
Thanked 11,572 Times in 6,319 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

UK£ today buys CHF 1.25
20% down from the November peak of CHF 1.55
Reply With Quote
  #4604  
Old 17.08.2016, 04:04
Jim2007's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kt. Bern
Posts: 2,801
Groaned at 55 Times in 51 Posts
Thanked 3,034 Times in 1,531 Posts
Jim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
The UK will always be able to attract business because it's the English speaking access point to Europe. America and Asia are already saying they stay on terms.
Except that there is another English speaking country with guaranteed access to the single market, passporting of financial services, lower corporate taxes and plenty of cheap office space....

They have also trebbled their trade missions for this year, beefed up their staff of advisers in London to help companies wanting to move and are working to get EU institutions currently based in the UK to move there.

No doubt other EU members are doing the same!
Reply With Quote
  #4605  
Old 17.08.2016, 04:14
Jim2007's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kt. Bern
Posts: 2,801
Groaned at 55 Times in 51 Posts
Thanked 3,034 Times in 1,531 Posts
Jim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
The original idea of the European market for free trade is good, but what Europe has built up politically around it is not acceptable to the masses.
Well again, neither the EEC nor the EU had free trade as the main objective that would be EFTA, the organization that Norway has said it would veto the UK's application to join.

And the masses of voters at the last EU Parliament elections voted for parties that supported a more integrated EU, which is why Junker heads the Commission.

Long on opinions and very short on facts.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Jim2007 for this useful post:
  #4606  
Old 17.08.2016, 08:16
TobiasM's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Zürich
Posts: 1,064
Groaned at 137 Times in 97 Posts
Thanked 1,940 Times in 905 Posts
TobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Just a matter of interest why do you say doubtful they said that, when in fact that's exactly what they said.

As I say you and I both have no idea what will happen. You take the negative angle, I use my views for the positive angle.

The telegraph article says that sources close to May say she's pressing ahead and is not wavering.

True it can all change and we believe what we want.

It was stated during the referendum that the UK has a trade deficit with Europe. So isn't it in Europe's interest to keep the UK on-board. All this hard-talk from the Euro ministers has been ignored so far.

Everyone who is negative plays the angle of how great Europe is to be in. Is it really doing so well at the moment when you look at it and if so why? I'm willing to be convinced.


You said they ALL said that? Sorry but I read the news in the papers and the magazines and they do not ALL feel or say what you said.
Reply With Quote
  #4607  
Old 17.08.2016, 10:16
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 5,145
Groaned at 160 Times in 135 Posts
Thanked 6,564 Times in 3,369 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
The thing is it's all open.
Not all, no. For instance no EEA without FMOP looks like it's a given.

With that said, those portions that are indeed open are exactly the problem for the next few years (more if rumors that article 50 won't be invoked before 2019 are true). Businesses don't know what parameters to use on profit calculations for future investments, hence investments from abroad are virtually guaranteed to shrink. There's a reason estimates for UK GDP growth have been revised downwards for 2017 and 2018 due to the "Leave" vote.
Reply With Quote
  #4608  
Old 17.08.2016, 10:34
Fowl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
"Europe is willing to negotiate with the UK" Do you have a source for this?

"There's also the rest of the world to negotiate with (more than half of the UK trade)." But this trade is mostly via the single market EU free trade agreements with the rest of the world which will no longer be available to UK after Brexit.
Merkel herself and she's the only one who counts. She has said it since the referendum. Who was the first person May went to? (forget Sturgeon ) It's between them to sort out.

Yes the single market EU free trade needs to be re-negotiated, but China has already said it will deal with the UK and that is the big one. The US has stated that the "special" friendship remains.

There was something that the EU is still negotiating an agreement with China and it's taken years, not sure of the exact details, but then as soon as BREXIT came China said it would negotiate with the UK.

Why will the EU not be available to the UK after BREXIT? do you really believe that they will cut all ties to the UK. The worst case net scenario that was presented by the remainers during the referendum was the status quo. Who wouldn't want to re-negotiate when the worst case is the status quo. This came out of the debates that they had. Yes I know how you present stats is variable, but it was the same for both sides.

People are massively overplaying how negative it is for the UK and that Europe holds all the cards. The simple fact is they don't. But let's see how it plays out.

Europe as it stood before the referendum was a failing entity and needed drastic action.

Another stat that you might like to have is that, had it been a general election 85% of the seats would have gone to BREXIT. That came out afterwards. How that comes from the 52% i don't know, but it's interesting none the less.

And when you think of who was for and who was against in lines of influence, then you realise what a monumental result it was and how unhappy Joe Public was with the current setup.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #4609  
Old 17.08.2016, 10:58
Belgianmum's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 9,613
Groaned at 81 Times in 76 Posts
Thanked 13,297 Times in 5,917 Posts
Belgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...d-eu-migration

It is the guardian so make of it what you will but I wonder if Teresa May is taking notes during her holidays?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Belgianmum for this useful post:
  #4610  
Old 17.08.2016, 11:43
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 8,569
Groaned at 246 Times in 212 Posts
Thanked 11,572 Times in 6,319 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Merkel herself and she's the only one who counts. She has said it since the referendum. Who was the first person May went to? (forget Sturgeon ) It's between them to sort out.

Yes the single market EU free trade needs to be re-negotiated, but China has already said it will deal with the UK and that is the big one. The US has stated that the "special" friendship remains.

There was something that the EU is still negotiating an agreement with China and it's taken years, not sure of the exact details, but then as soon as BREXIT came China said it would negotiate with the UK.

Why will the EU not be available to the UK after BREXIT? do you really believe that they will cut all ties to the UK. The worst case net scenario that was presented by the remainers during the referendum was the status quo. Who wouldn't want to re-negotiate when the worst case is the status quo. This came out of the debates that they had. Yes I know how you present stats is variable, but it was the same for both sides.

People are massively overplaying how negative it is for the UK and that Europe holds all the cards. The simple fact is they don't. But let's see how it plays out.

Europe as it stood before the referendum was a failing entity and needed drastic action.

Another stat that you might like to have is that, had it been a general election 85% of the seats would have gone to BREXIT. That came out afterwards. How that comes from the 52% i don't know, but it's interesting none the less.

And when you think of who was for and who was against in lines of influence, then you realise what a monumental result it was and how unhappy Joe Public was with the current setup.
"Why will the EU not be available to the UK after BREXIT?" Because the UK has decided to leave the EU due to Brexit.
It is not a case of the EU leaving the UK

As many people have posted if the EU should agree to negotiate an FTA with the UK then (like Norway and Switzerland) it will include FMOP and contributions by the UK to the EU budget; UK will lose the ability to influence, to vote on and to veto new EU rules.
Will the people who voted for Brexit be happy with this solution.

"Merkel herself " assuming she is still there after the German elections next year
Anyway
Quote; "Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has dismissed Boris Johnson’s proposal that Britain might enjoy access to the European single market and restrict immigration at the same time, telling German MPs the UK would enjoy no special favours."

Source

Last edited by marton; 17.08.2016 at 12:42.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank marton for this useful post:
  #4611  
Old 17.08.2016, 12:23
Fowl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Yes the Guardian, as above about her holiday in Switzerland showing how bad BREXIT for England would be. Haven't read it, but the headline is spectacular!!!!

I'm a bit sceptical of all press. Both sides. Whenever you read an article the last sentence usually contradicts/negates the headline, but who reads that far?

Predictions, forecasts, negative scaremongering were all tried during the campaign and you know the result. Emergency budgets required, armageddon, next world war, fear, panic the lot. A sickening death during the campaign.

The negative effects on the economy were pushed constantly.

The result was the majority said no, we don't want this anymore.

It was a campaign like any other, the same players who had won before, in fact how many players were for BREXIT?

And still the remainers say we have to accept FMOP and all these other things, but the serious question is why? The UK was one of the two (+Germany) big givers to Europe. They were a major player. When you're such you don't just walk away and say "ok we'll do what you say now". It's not logical.

But inspite of this, how much will everything really change? I see it more as a checkpoint. People have to look and say what is going on here? Is it overall for the good and sustainable?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #4612  
Old 17.08.2016, 12:25
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 9,246
Groaned at 179 Times in 154 Posts
Thanked 17,590 Times in 7,466 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Quote; "Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has dismissed Boris Johnson’s proposal that Britain might enjoy access to the European single market and restrict immigration at the same time, telling German MPs the UK would enjoy no special favours."
Angela Merkel has managed to flip flop on every important issue: Nuclear power, minimum wage, visas for Turkey, military service ... hey, in her youth she marched with FDJ and swore eternal allegiance to communism.

But when she says her opinion on Brexit won't change, we're expected to believe her?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank amogles for this useful post:
  #4613  
Old 17.08.2016, 13:00
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 5,145
Groaned at 160 Times in 135 Posts
Thanked 6,564 Times in 3,369 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
And still the remainers say we have to accept FMOP and all these other things, but the serious question is why?
Because that's what the EU demands: There's no privileged access to the EEA without FMOP, both or none.

Quote:
View Post
But when she says her opinion on Brexit won't change, we're expected to believe her?
Wrt EEA/FMOP, so far yes.

I agree that she's a Wendehals and that the direction her flag waves changes with the wind. And I woulnd't mind at all if FMOP fell. But that's not really useful as in all likelihood UK will have to negotiate based on the status quo.
Reply With Quote
  #4614  
Old 17.08.2016, 13:13
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geneva
Posts: 520
Groaned at 42 Times in 27 Posts
Thanked 874 Times in 505 Posts
Reb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
The UK was one of the two (+Germany) big givers to Europe. They were a major player. When you're such you don't just walk away and say "ok we'll do what you say now". It's not logical.
Do you think 27 member states will now dance to one former member state's tune? Surely the UK as chosen to exchange being a big fish in a small pond (Europe) for being a small fish in a big pond (the world), though Brexiter logic would seem to be that it will be an even bigger fish in the big pond.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Reb77Br for this useful post:
  #4615  
Old 17.08.2016, 13:39
Fowl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Do you think 27 member states will now dance to one former member state's tune? Surely the UK as chosen to exchange being a big fish in a small pond (Europe) for being a small fish in a big pond (the world), though Brexiter logic would seem to be that it will be an even bigger fish in the big pond.
Maybe you misinterpreted what I said. It's now a negotiation, but the hand of the UK is being underplayed. They are the 6th biggest economy in the world (were the 5th but since Brexit fell behind France, so it's close). That is hardly a small fish in a big pond. The UK was also a significant net contributor to Europe, Europe doesn't want to give that up.

But it's a negotiation and it's then up to both sides to decide.

Brexit logic is that we have the chance to negotiate as a fairly significant player. Where does it say that we suddenly became bigger? No one is claiming that.

But this is all the trade argument,which is what lost in the referendum. The social / political issues are equally if not more significant. The trade was shown to be a non-issue.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #4616  
Old 17.08.2016, 14:05
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 8,569
Groaned at 246 Times in 212 Posts
Thanked 11,572 Times in 6,319 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Maybe you misinterpreted what I said. It's now a negotiation, but the hand of the UK is being underplayed. They are the 6th biggest economy in the world (were the 5th but since Brexit fell behind France, so it's close). That is hardly a small fish in a big pond. The UK was also a significant net contributor to Europe, Europe doesn't want to give that up.

But it's a negotiation and it's then up to both sides to decide.

Brexit logic is that we have the chance to negotiate as a fairly significant player. Where does it say that we suddenly became bigger? No one is claiming that.

But this is all the trade argument,which is what lost in the referendum. The social / political issues are equally if not more significant. The trade was shown to be a non-issue.
"The UK was also a significant net contributor to Europe, " As I posted before nay deal will include FMOP and big financial contributions from UK
Reply With Quote
  #4617  
Old 17.08.2016, 14:05
fatmanfilms's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Verbier
Posts: 15,675
Groaned at 252 Times in 213 Posts
Thanked 13,087 Times in 7,364 Posts
fatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond reputefatmanfilms has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Such a big deal on free movement when the UK's unemployment rate is very low v the rest of the EU. Realistically it's a bigger loss to the rest of the EU.

Oh unemployment fell in the uk since BREXIT vote
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank fatmanfilms for this useful post:
  #4618  
Old 17.08.2016, 14:34
TobiasM's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Zürich
Posts: 1,064
Groaned at 137 Times in 97 Posts
Thanked 1,940 Times in 905 Posts
TobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond reputeTobiasM has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Such a big deal on free movement when the UK's unemployment rate is very low v the rest of the EU. Realistically it's a bigger loss to the rest of the EU.

Oh unemployment fell in the uk since BREXIT vote
You do know that the government fiddles those numbers, by denying people unemployment benefit. Like the invisible homelessness that don't exist in London.
Reply With Quote
  #4619  
Old 17.08.2016, 14:48
Fowl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
"The UK was also a significant net contributor to Europe, " As I posted before nay deal will include FMOP and big financial contributions from UK
Ok say why that is?

Negotiations haven't begun and you're giving the result. FMOP is a requirement when you're in Europe. UK is no longer in Europe. They are free to negotiate. They are negotiating with 27 countries but in reality only 1 or 2 count. there are interests on both sides.

America, China etc don't have FMOP with Europe.

Let the negotiations begin first.
Reply With Quote
  #4620  
Old 17.08.2016, 15:39
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geneva
Posts: 520
Groaned at 42 Times in 27 Posts
Thanked 874 Times in 505 Posts
Reb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

The UK economy is much smaller than the US or Chinese economies, and they are not in Europe. It's closer to the size of Switzerland's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...y_GDP_(nominal)


I find it hard to imagine EU countries wanting to cut the UK a special deal without freedom of movement and little or no EU contribution, especially if doing so would strengthen other EU-exit movements.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Latest Referendum, what will be consequences for EU (C permit and B permit) holders? expat2014 Permits/visas/government 3 11.02.2014 08:59
Importing vehicles and the VAT consequences in Switzerland from France BEFO Finance/banking/taxation 6 07.08.2013 15:11
The (Available in CH) Dog Food Review Thread meloncollie Pet corner 44 08.05.2012 20:15
Common-law marriage and consequences in CH Mishto Family matters/health 9 01.10.2011 22:03
Something for the Brits: M&S in CH mark Daily life 11 15.11.2007 12:18


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0