Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Daily life  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #10041  
Old 31.05.2020, 20:24
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Zürich
Posts: 202
Groaned at 16 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
vladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Thanks for your advice to ignore you!
ohh, nice. Thank you, for mutual ignoring
Reply With Quote
  #10042  
Old 31.05.2020, 20:46
TonyClifton's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Zurich
Posts: 802
Groaned at 264 Times in 172 Posts
Thanked 1,778 Times in 874 Posts
TonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post


Every day makes me laugh!

I know you like ETH studies so you will welcome a new one that forecasts the Swiss coronavirus second wave will bring at least 5,000 deaths.
Myself, I find this scary
Mr. “7% is peanuts” getting worried about a single study suggesting 0.05% of the population of Switzerland could die in a second wave
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank TonyClifton for this useful post:
This user groans at TonyClifton for this post:
  #10043  
Old 01.06.2020, 03:18
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 8,832
Groaned at 270 Times in 217 Posts
Thanked 18,158 Times in 7,301 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Mr. “7% is peanuts” getting worried about a single study suggesting 0.05% of the population of Switzerland could die in a second wave
COVID-19 has killed 1,920 people in Switzerland so far. Have you noticed how concerned everybody (except you and a few friends, maybe) is about that? A second wave killing at least 5,000 would be a very big deal. About a 250% bigger deal than the current wave, in fact.

You can be flippant about 5,000 excess deaths, if you wish, but it's not a great look. I guess you don't have close family here, especially elderly loved ones, otherwise you might rethink your indifference.

By way of comparison, I assume you're aware of the intense focus on road safety in Switzerland -- the low speed limits, police-informer culture (especially in the German part), Via Sicura, stratospheric fines, etc? A lot of this is in response to the unacceptably high death rate on Swiss roads 15 years ago. Do you know how many people died in road accidents in Switzerland in 2007? Let me tell you: 384. It was 233 in 2018.

Do you still think 5,000 deaths -- or even 1,920 -- is laughably insignificant? They are preventable deaths, even more so than road traffic deaths, and they should be prevented. You don't get to choose who lives and who dies.
Reply With Quote
The following 15 users would like to thank 22 yards for this useful post:
  #10044  
Old 01.06.2020, 09:37
Medea Fleecestealer's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 21,481
Groaned at 371 Times in 286 Posts
Thanked 16,294 Times in 9,247 Posts
Medea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Interesting read if you want to know more about the virus. Although reading it makes me wonder if a vaccine is even possible, given the number of ways it seems to attack.

https://www.bbc.com/news/52760992
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Medea Fleecestealer for this useful post:
  #10045  
Old 01.06.2020, 10:07
V__'s Avatar
V__ V__ is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 1,301
Groaned at 283 Times in 154 Posts
Thanked 1,344 Times in 646 Posts
V__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post

They are preventable deaths, even more so than road traffic deaths, and they should be prevented. You don't get to choose who lives and who dies.

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank V__ for this useful post:
This user groans at V__ for this post:
  #10046  
Old 01.06.2020, 12:10
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Zürich
Posts: 202
Groaned at 16 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
vladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Interesting read if you want to know more about the virus. Although reading it makes me wonder if a vaccine is even possible, given the number of ways it seems to attack.

https://www.bbc.com/news/52760992
blood clots, cytokine storms etc is not something new when speaking about respiratory viral infections like flu
you can make a quick google about it and will find out a lot of articles long before pandemic
I wonder, why doctor's so "surprised" about it
Reply With Quote
  #10047  
Old 01.06.2020, 12:20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: ZH
Posts: 309
Groaned at 22 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 275 Times in 143 Posts
LifeStrain has earned the respect of manyLifeStrain has earned the respect of manyLifeStrain has earned the respect of many
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
blood clots, cytokine storms etc is not something new when speaking about respiratory viral infections like flu
you can make a quick google about it and will find out a lot of articles long before pandemic
I wonder, why doctor's so "surprised" about it
Maybe because it is much more common than before and this leads to high mortality rate.
Reply With Quote
  #10048  
Old 01.06.2020, 15:06
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Zürich
Posts: 202
Groaned at 16 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
vladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Maybe because it is much more common than before and this leads to high mortality rate.
there is still no numbers on this, so no reason to speculate atm
the IFR currently is from 0.2 to 0.4 which is twice more than seasonal flu, but taking in account not all numbers are in place, the actual IFR might be lower
Reply With Quote
  #10049  
Old 01.06.2020, 17:12
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 8,832
Groaned at 270 Times in 217 Posts
Thanked 18,158 Times in 7,301 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Interesting read if you want to know more about the virus. Although reading it makes me wonder if a vaccine is even possible, given the number of ways it seems to attack.

https://www.bbc.com/news/52760992
I understand that Novartis started manufacturing a vaccine a couple of days ago. Whether that was for commercialization or for more investigation, I don't know.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank 22 yards for this useful post:
  #10050  
Old 01.06.2020, 18:12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Zürich
Posts: 62
Groaned at 8 Times in 7 Posts
Thanked 118 Times in 59 Posts
youcannotbeserious has earned the respect of manyyoucannotbeserious has earned the respect of manyyoucannotbeserious has earned the respect of many
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Do you still think 5,000 deaths -- or even 1,920 -- is laughably insignificant? They are preventable deaths, even more so than road traffic deaths, and they should be prevented. You don't get to choose who lives and who dies.
Personally, I've been thinking about this lately. If I ask how many deaths are acceptable, many will immediately answer that no death is acceptable. And while it is obvious that we can always try to further reduce the numbers, there is a point at which drastic measures are not reasonable. For instance, there isn't a debate to ban cars and motorbikes just because that could save a couple hundred lives. Or at least not a significant one.

If now that borders will reopen throughout Europe there is a moderate increase in the number of corona cases, and subsequently in deaths, where is the limit? Let's take a look at the numbers from Germany, just because it is a bigger country. With around 83 million inhabitants there are some 2,500 daily deaths. Would 10 daily corona deaths be too many, while of course, we keep doing as much as possible to find a treatment or a vaccine, we maintain some not too paranoid hygiene measures, etc? Would 20 or 30 daily deaths be ok? For reference, in 2018 3,275 people died in road accidents in Germany, 9 per day. Assuming a CFR of 3%, 10 daily deaths in the long run (in a steady state, not with exponential growth) would mean 330 daily cases, while 20 deaths would mean 670 cases and 30 deaths 1000 cases. Now bring that back to Switzerland, you can give or take divide by 10. Are 30 daily cases and 1 daily death ok? 60 cases and 2 deaths? What is the acceptable limit that means that we can go on with our lives and we do not need stricter measures, border closures, etc?

Edit: the reference to not too paranoid hygiene measures refers mainly to the stupidity I see in my home country

Last edited by youcannotbeserious; 01.06.2020 at 18:18. Reason: add note
Reply With Quote
The following 9 users would like to thank youcannotbeserious for this useful post:
  #10051  
Old 01.06.2020, 18:24
roegner's Avatar
Moderately Dutch
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,376
Groaned at 349 Times in 291 Posts
Thanked 12,388 Times in 5,954 Posts
roegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post

If now that borders will reopen throughout Europe there is a moderate increase in the number of corona cases, and subsequently in deaths, where is the limit? Let's take a look at the numbers from Germany, just because it is a bigger country. With around 83 million inhabitants there are some 2,500 daily deaths. Would 10 daily corona deaths be too many, while of course, we keep doing as much as possible to find a treatment or a vaccine, we maintain some not too paranoid hygiene measures, etc? Would 20 or 30 daily deaths be ok? For reference, in 2018 3,275 people died in road accidents in Germany, 9 per day. Assuming a CFR of 3%, 10 daily deaths in the long run (in a steady state, not with exponential growth) would mean 330 daily cases, while 20 deaths would mean 670 cases and 30 deaths 1000 cases.
Difficult question, also as Germany up to now had a recorded 8.511 people dying from Covid19, which is low comparatively.

And how long will you take those measures, until your economy collapses?

I´m happy that this is not my decision and I hope there will be a vaccin soon.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank roegner for this useful post:
  #10052  
Old 01.06.2020, 18:28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: ZH
Posts: 309
Groaned at 22 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 275 Times in 143 Posts
LifeStrain has earned the respect of manyLifeStrain has earned the respect of manyLifeStrain has earned the respect of many
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
there is still no numbers on this, so no reason to speculate atm
the IFR currently is from 0.2 to 0.4 which is twice more than seasonal flu, but taking in account not all numbers are in place, the actual IFR might be lower
NYC population = 8.4M
NYC deaths so far = 21.5k
Divide one by another and you get 0.25% and this assumes everyone in NYC had it, which is obviously not the case. The real value is closer to 1-2%.

There is no reason to speculate on this, indeed. Lookup the numbers before posting nonsence.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank LifeStrain for this useful post:
  #10053  
Old 01.06.2020, 19:41
Blueangel's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 3,888
Groaned at 105 Times in 96 Posts
Thanked 10,610 Times in 4,679 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
I understand that Novartis started manufacturing a vaccine a couple of days ago. Whether that was for commercialization or for more investigation, I don't know.
That's the 4th one I've heard of going to production. The others are one in China and two in the UK, but I'm sure there are more. The logic is to begin production based upon good results during the second phase of testing (on animals) and before the testing in humans because if successful, the demand will be so great and immediate.
Reply With Quote
  #10054  
Old 01.06.2020, 19:58
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ZH
Posts: 7,115
Groaned at 67 Times in 54 Posts
Thanked 10,342 Times in 4,235 Posts
doropfiz has a reputation beyond reputedoropfiz has a reputation beyond reputedoropfiz has a reputation beyond reputedoropfiz has a reputation beyond reputedoropfiz has a reputation beyond reputedoropfiz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
If now that borders will reopen throughout Europe there is a moderate increase in the number of corona cases, and subsequently in deaths, where is the limit?
The number of deaths is not the only measure. It could be quite serious for an economy if a significant number of people were moderately to seriously ill (so that they can't do their work, and need help), even if they later go on to recover.
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank doropfiz for this useful post:
  #10055  
Old 01.06.2020, 20:36
3Wishes's Avatar
Moderately Amused
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bern area
Posts: 10,686
Groaned at 77 Times in 74 Posts
Thanked 17,720 Times in 7,956 Posts
3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
...Now bring that back to Switzerland, you can give or take divide by 10. Are 30 daily cases and 1 daily death ok? 60 cases and 2 deaths? What is the acceptable limit that means that we can go on with our lives and we do not need stricter measures, border closures, etc?...
Switzerland is about at your numbers now. The last day there were more than 50 new cases reported was May 11th. Since May 9th there have not been more than 10 deaths per day. Source.

We've opened up gradually and the trend continues downward. Based on the moves the federal council has made to open up further, it would seem these numbers are what they deem "acceptable" in terms of getting on with life.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank 3Wishes for this useful post:
  #10056  
Old 01.06.2020, 20:51
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Zürich
Posts: 202
Groaned at 16 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
vladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
NYC population = 8.4M
NYC deaths so far = 21.5k
Divide one by another and you get 0.25% and this assumes everyone in NYC had it, which is obviously not the case. The real value is closer to 1-2%.

There is no reason to speculate on this, indeed. Lookup the numbers before posting nonsence.
you posted 1-2%. where did you get it? from nowhere?
there is a special trained people, who do the job for you:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....13.20101253v1

"Lookup the numbers before posting nonsence" (c)
Reply With Quote
  #10057  
Old 01.06.2020, 20:53
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Zürich
Posts: 202
Groaned at 16 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
vladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond reputevladest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
the demand will be so great and immediate.
there is always a chance that long-term side-effects will be much worse then direct effect.
I think it should be used wisely at 1st time
Reply With Quote
  #10058  
Old 01.06.2020, 20:56
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Zurich
Posts: 639
Groaned at 50 Times in 33 Posts
Thanked 1,369 Times in 552 Posts
terrifisch has a reputation beyond reputeterrifisch has a reputation beyond reputeterrifisch has a reputation beyond reputeterrifisch has a reputation beyond reputeterrifisch has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
... getting on with life, cautiously. At least, presumably enough people are still practicing all the recommended hygiene and social distancing measures, enough of the time, for there to have been no increase in infections.

It'll be interesting to see the rates of infection in two, four and six weeks as, bit by bit, people become more mobile again, and also as even the generally sensible, considerate, disciplined or fearful people (whatever their motivation) are likely to gradually grow more lax in upholding those measures.
I walk my dog all throughout central Zurich and I can only say that the numbers outside have doubled or even tripled; very few wear masks and there is very little social distancing compared to 4 weeks ago. The fact that Zurich has not seen any spike is curious to me. Either the warmer weather has mitigated the viral spread or many more people have had this virus than originally thought. I would have expected a spike in Zurich based on what I have observed the past three weeks.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank terrifisch for this useful post:
  #10059  
Old 01.06.2020, 20:57
TonyClifton's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Zurich
Posts: 802
Groaned at 264 Times in 172 Posts
Thanked 1,778 Times in 874 Posts
TonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
COVID-19 has killed 1,920 people in Switzerland so far. Have you noticed how concerned everybody (except you and a few friends, maybe) is about that? A second wave killing at least 5,000 would be a very big deal. About a 250% bigger deal than the current wave, in fact.

You can be flippant about 5,000 excess deaths, if you wish, but it's not a great look. I guess you don't have close family here, especially elderly loved ones, otherwise you might rethink your indifference.

By way of comparison, I assume you're aware of the intense focus on road safety in Switzerland -- the low speed limits, police-informer culture (especially in the German part), Via Sicura, stratospheric fines, etc? A lot of this is in response to the unacceptably high death rate on Swiss roads 15 years ago. Do you know how many people died in road accidents in Switzerland in 2007? Let me tell you: 384. It was 233 in 2018.

Do you still think 5,000 deaths -- or even 1,920 -- is laughably insignificant? They are preventable deaths, even more so than road traffic deaths, and they should be prevented. You don't get to choose who lives and who dies.
Save your hand wringing and straw man arguments, there isn't going to be a second wave that kills 5000 people in Switzerland.

https://www.bielertagblatt.ch/nachri...na-welle-geben
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank TonyClifton for this useful post:
The following 2 users groan at TonyClifton for this post:
  #10060  
Old 01.06.2020, 21:03
roegner's Avatar
Moderately Dutch
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,376
Groaned at 349 Times in 291 Posts
Thanked 12,388 Times in 5,954 Posts
roegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond reputeroegner has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Save your hand wringing and straw man arguments, there isn't going to be a second wave that kills 5000 people in Switzerland.

https://www.bielertagblatt.ch/nachri...na-welle-geben
22yards never said there will be one.....

And even if you do not agree, safety measures probably have saved us from worse.
Reply With Quote
The following 5 users would like to thank roegner for this useful post:
Reply

Tags
cold, corona, coronavirus, covid, covid-19, flu, health, medical, virus




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests)
vladest
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0