Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Daily life  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #13361  
Old 09.10.2020, 14:24
Axa's Avatar
Axa Axa is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Suhr, Aargau
Posts: 3,631
Groaned at 42 Times in 42 Posts
Thanked 4,882 Times in 2,265 Posts
Axa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
There wouldn't be much of a Trump thread in that case.

But I'm speaking for all countries. CH is rich, and pragmatic, and seems to be a poster boy now for managing this issue.
As discussed elsewhere, a lot of Effers will leave CH at some point, so it is a concern.

Meantime, any payment suggestions as it seems we want to be the richest corpses in the cemetery.
The only concern is that the poor emerging economies countries who could not afford a covid economic package will fare worse economically in the next few years compared to the developed economies with relief packages financed by strong tax collection. More than who will pay, the worry will be should we have spent more?

Worries about Trump on the Trump thread. Anyway, worst thing can happen is Trump wins a second presidential term and then disappears into irrelevance. If a Trump second term can derail someone's plans......they're dreams not a solid strategy set by an adult.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Axa for this useful post:
  #13362  
Old 09.10.2020, 14:29
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 32,036
Groaned at 2,414 Times in 1,755 Posts
Thanked 39,048 Times in 18,409 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Might as well get rid of health insurance and have everyone paying for the health cost they cause. Wouldn't that be fair?
That's how it worked the first ten years that I lived here.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #13363  
Old 09.10.2020, 14:38
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: BaselStadt
Posts: 482
Groaned at 91 Times in 42 Posts
Thanked 974 Times in 393 Posts
CodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
I'd rather be perceived as "shedding crocodile tears" than to be a psychopath who thinks that the elderly and people born with auto-immune diseases, etc. should be financially penalized for it.
I do apologise, I forgot to add 'bed wetting'.


But anyway, where exactly, and do quote me please, have I said the elderly and people born with auto-immune diseases, etc. should be financialy penalised?


What I said was I did not think the younger generations should be on the hook for this, and that inheritance tax should be used as a tool to recoup the costs. In fact inheritance tax means no-one (alive) pays any more tax than they would have!


Also, any suggestions on how the billions will be paid back?
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank CodPeace for this useful post:
The following 2 users groan at CodPeace for this post:
  #13364  
Old 09.10.2020, 14:51
gaburko's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: BL
Posts: 1,091
Groaned at 164 Times in 111 Posts
Thanked 2,920 Times in 1,062 Posts
gaburko has a reputation beyond reputegaburko has a reputation beyond reputegaburko has a reputation beyond reputegaburko has a reputation beyond reputegaburko has a reputation beyond reputegaburko has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Also, any suggestions on how the billions will be paid back?
It will be those nasty, inconsiderate and noisy youngsters who have to start paying! Oh, wait, they are unemployed, denied education and in no position to sort out their lives in the convenient, safe and fairly stable way that most 50+ were lucky enough to enjoy.
Reply With Quote
  #13365  
Old 09.10.2020, 15:10
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 2,521
Groaned at 127 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 4,589 Times in 1,833 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

BAG does a press conference to announce the change of the campaign colour from blue to orange ... what a joke.
Reply With Quote
The following 5 users would like to thank komsomolez for this useful post:
  #13366  
Old 09.10.2020, 15:19
3Wishes's Avatar
Moderately Amused
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bern area
Posts: 11,274
Groaned at 89 Times in 85 Posts
Thanked 19,423 Times in 8,589 Posts
3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Similar question to you as the one I asked Greenmount: why does a challenge to a statement that is wrong becomes "silly" just because you tend to disagree with the general view of the challenger? At the same time, really silly "facts" go unnoticed and even liked simply because you tend to agree with the person in general? Don't you think that there's a certain loss if debate is not free? I should probably stop now as I risk getting banned again for disagreeing with a mod like last week, but this panic-room sometimes produces exceptional alarmism

And no, I've never tried to re-phrase long-term, you misunderstood me. I simply challenged the 40% which was presented as a fact.
I didn't say you or your posts were silly, I said "it's getting silly" as in the whole back-and-forth. You choose to focus on the 40%, which Melusine didn't even claim was a fact, and it sort of went down a rabbit hole from there.

Disagree if you want, I don't care as long as it's civil. In this particular exchange, I felt you were coming across as snarky and arrogant with the "I told you so" posts when what Melusine said was never declared as fact. You interpreted it as her claiming a fact.

Similarly, because you kept going on about peer-reviewed studies, I interpreted your posts as meaning you were thinking long-term as in years - even though you never used those exact words.

Such is life reading words on a screen instead of having a lively debate in person.

Quote:
View Post
...The authors of the new paper, who rediscovered the figures in their reappraisal, said the Government appeared to have chosen to protect the NHS in the short term, rather than save lives throughout the whole epidemic. Although it reduced peak demand for ICU beds, it prolonged the epidemic, resulting in more long-term Covid-19 deaths...
That was the word order of the original slogan, you know. "Stay home. Protect the NHS. Save lives."

Jokes aside, what other approach could they take? It appeared the NHS was being overwhelmed, which meant that surely more people would die if they could not receive needed care. Yes, flattening the curve means that deaths continue for a while, albeit at a more manageable pace.

Quote:
View Post
Some months ago and several hundred pages of this mighty thread, I suggested that as one in the vulnerable group by age (71), if nothing else, I would be more than happy to let every one younger than me go about their lives without restriction...
I'm really happy you are still able to get out and about on your own and make this type of decision for yourself, and that you have such a pragmatic attitude.

The unfortunate reality is that thousands of people are not as fit as you and fully able to care for themselves. They can't function without those "young people" who come in and care for them - doctors, nurses, cleaning crews, food workers, etc. - those young people who you want to go about their lives without restriction.

Also if my outings are any indicator, you're in the minority of "vulnerable age" people in terms of staying home for the most part. I've seen more pensioners out and about on our hikes than I have younger folks.
Reply With Quote
The following 7 users would like to thank 3Wishes for this useful post:
  #13367  
Old 09.10.2020, 15:24
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zurich
Posts: 13,555
Groaned at 1,251 Times in 833 Posts
Thanked 19,834 Times in 7,648 Posts
Chuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Also, any suggestions on how the billions will be paid back?
To think that you, I or anyone else on this forum needs to come up with practical suggestions is laughable. You are a random muggins on an internet forum, in reality you have no idea how to juggle the budget of an entire country, with all of the myriad of complexities that entails. Everything you are writing here with regards to IHT etc as though they are workable solutions is just speculative BS and means absolutely nothing.

Last edited by Chuff; 09.10.2020 at 16:55.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Chuff for this useful post:
This user groans at Chuff for this post:
  #13368  
Old 09.10.2020, 15:36
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Thun
Posts: 50
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 103 Times in 33 Posts
Limestone is considered knowledgeableLimestone is considered knowledgeableLimestone is considered knowledgeable
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
How lovely to put the blame on the young! You mean the people out of job, out of prospects that you and me had and the people that can't properly go to finish their studies? Yes, this is EXACTLY the target we should aim to fix everything

I'm not putting the blame on the young, but on people who refuse to follow recommendations from the government. My apology for the misunderstanding.


Social distancing, social hygiene and masks can help keep the cases under control so that the businesses and life can return to almost normal. Yet, people complained that their freedom is compromised and refused to follow. Then when the situation is getting out of control, e.g. hospitals are overloaded, what choice does the government have?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Limestone for this useful post:
  #13369  
Old 09.10.2020, 15:42
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 11,357
Groaned at 522 Times in 441 Posts
Thanked 20,357 Times in 10,716 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
BAG does a press conference to announce the change of the campaign colour from blue to orange ... what a joke.
Presumably, a tribute to Trump to compensate for failing to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reply With Quote
  #13370  
Old 09.10.2020, 16:03
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
A reanalysis of the Imperial College modelling that led to lockdown in March shows that shutting schools and preventing youngsters from mingling may have had the counterintuitive effect of actually killing more people.

In a study published in the BMJ, Edinburgh University predicted that over the entire course of the pandemic, keeping children out of classrooms would increase deaths by between 80,000 and 95,000. Likewise, social distancing of everyone, rather than just the over-70s, could cost between 149,000 and 178,000 lives.

Experts say the virus was able to spread faster to vulnerable people once lockdown measures were introduced than if some level of immunity had been allowed to build up in the young.

The authors of the new paper, who rediscovered the figures in their reappraisal, said the Government appeared to have chosen to protect the NHS in the short term, rather than save lives throughout the whole epidemic. Although it reduced peak demand for ICU beds, it prolonged the epidemic, resulting in more long-term Covid-19 deaths.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...tudy-suggests/
A slightly different take on the Edinburgh work here:

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/2062...9-projections/

And the actual Edinburgh paper (not the Telegraph's take on it) here:

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3588

Quote:
...the Edinburgh study's author Professor Graeme Ackland said: "Scientific predictions are often published to great fanfare, with retrospective analysis seldom attracting as much attention.....With hindsight, the Imperial model has proved remarkably accurate. It turned out that the experts really are expert."
All the stuff you appear to think is new was in the original Imperial paper back in March and Edinburgh come to the same conclusions.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #13371  
Old 09.10.2020, 16:36
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: BaselStadt
Posts: 482
Groaned at 91 Times in 42 Posts
Thanked 974 Times in 393 Posts
CodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond reputeCodPeace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
You are a random muggins on an internet forum
And you're not?
Quote:
View Post
in reality you have no idea how to juggle the budget of an entire with all of the myriad of complexities that entails.
You don't say? and here's me thinking I was onto something. Talk about stating the bleedin' obvious.
Quote:
View Post
Everything you are writing here with regards to IHT etc as though they are workable solutions is just speculative BS and means absolutely nothing.
So I fit right in with the bollox that you come up with then?
Where did I say they are workable solutions? I said they are suggestions, while I randomly pass the time of day.

The libtards are quick enough to defend lockdowns et al. Yet no suggestions, despite a random muggins coming up with one, on how to pay for it all.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank CodPeace for this useful post:
  #13372  
Old 09.10.2020, 17:59
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Bern
Posts: 288
Groaned at 199 Times in 106 Posts
Thanked 995 Times in 467 Posts
Full Circle has a reputation beyond reputeFull Circle has a reputation beyond reputeFull Circle has a reputation beyond reputeFull Circle has a reputation beyond reputeFull Circle has a reputation beyond reputeFull Circle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
The libtards are quick enough to defend lockdowns et al. Yet no suggestions, despite a random muggins coming up with one, on how to pay for it all.
Permanent ban!
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank Full Circle for this useful post:
  #13373  
Old 09.10.2020, 19:03
V__'s Avatar
V__ V__ is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 1,511
Groaned at 384 Times in 215 Posts
Thanked 2,082 Times in 866 Posts
V__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond reputeV__ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Permanent ban!
That seems to be the current solution around here. Maybe when they ban all of us who don't support lock downs maybe they will finally feel safe

But the question of the cost eventually will have to be answered...
Reply With Quote
The following 6 users would like to thank V__ for this useful post:
  #13374  
Old 09.10.2020, 19:28
Belgianmum's Avatar
Roastbeef & Yorkshire mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 13,268
Groaned at 241 Times in 202 Posts
Thanked 22,194 Times in 9,068 Posts
Belgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Permanent ban!
He’ll be back, it’s not his first rodeo.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Belgianmum for this useful post:
  #13375  
Old 09.10.2020, 19:39
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 2,521
Groaned at 127 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 4,589 Times in 1,833 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
VD and VS are gonna stop testing people mild symptoms.. Like runny nose and headaches etc.

So we'll likely all be happy, the cases reported will drop significantly

ay 06:45
https://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/11664...-1602184941239
Is actually true? BAG have confirmed strategy of immediate test if symptomatic.
Reply With Quote
  #13376  
Old 09.10.2020, 19:44
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 32,036
Groaned at 2,414 Times in 1,755 Posts
Thanked 39,048 Times in 18,409 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Why isn't Chuff banned then?

Tom
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #13377  
Old 09.10.2020, 19:58
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: LaCote
Posts: 1,294
Groaned at 9 Times in 9 Posts
Thanked 2,329 Times in 886 Posts
Sigh has a reputation beyond reputeSigh has a reputation beyond reputeSigh has a reputation beyond reputeSigh has a reputation beyond reputeSigh has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Is actually true? BAG have confirmed strategy of immediate test if symptomatic.
Yes it is

https://coronavirus.unisante.ch/

If you only have what they call minor symptoms such as headache etc they will test only if you have been in contact with a person who is positive....
Reply With Quote
  #13378  
Old 09.10.2020, 20:02
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 2,521
Groaned at 127 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 4,589 Times in 1,833 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Yes it is

https://coronavirus.unisante.ch/

If you only have what they call minor symptoms such as headache etc they will test only if you have been in contact with a person who is positive....
So BAG recommends something different. That's very comforting.
Reply With Quote
  #13379  
Old 09.10.2020, 20:16
Pancakes's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Zurich-ish
Posts: 5,022
Groaned at 281 Times in 201 Posts
Thanked 10,562 Times in 3,962 Posts
Pancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
But anyway, where exactly, and do quote me please, have I said the elderly and people born with auto-immune diseases, etc. should be financialy penalised?
Here you go:

Quote:
View Post
Personally I'd like to see the living, and the older living at that, pay substantial taxes for the cost of these lockdowns.

I don't see why the young/middle aged (say everyone below 60) should be burdened with even more debt and taxes to pay for a disease which would not have harmed them (queue virtue signaller saying 'We don't know that! We don't know who is vulnerable until it's too late!')
Quote:
View Post
I do apologise, I forgot to add 'bed wetting'.
Clearly, maturity isn't really your 'thing,' now is it?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Pancakes for this useful post:
  #13380  
Old 09.10.2020, 20:47
Pancakes's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Zurich-ish
Posts: 5,022
Groaned at 281 Times in 201 Posts
Thanked 10,562 Times in 3,962 Posts
Pancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
View Post
Yes it is

https://coronavirus.unisante.ch/

If you only have what they call minor symptoms such as headache etc they will test only if you have been in contact with a person who is positive....
Wow. And how exactly is someone supposed to know if they've been in contact with someone who is positive? You can be in contact with a positive person who doesn't even know that they're positive.

It sounds to me like insurance companies and the government are tired of paying for tests. Perhaps they also want to keep the #'s down to try to make the situation here look better than it really is.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cold, corona, coronavirus, covid, covid-19, flu, health, medical, virus




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (0 members and 6 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coronavirus Jokes makeabigwish Daily life 265 Yesterday 22:07
Coronavirus closed janvier Forum support 18 01.11.2020 14:12
Paid holidays and coronavirus Curtiss Employment 2 20.04.2020 10:22
Coronavirus scammers are out there - be warned Medea Fleecestealer Daily life 9 18.04.2020 19:53
Leaving Switzerland for UK during coronavirus barkingtreewolf Leaving Switzerland 19 11.04.2020 12:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0