Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Help & tips > Finance/banking/taxation
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12.01.2017, 18:14
ivank's Avatar
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: ZH
Posts: 2,279
Groaned at 84 Times in 70 Posts
Thanked 1,975 Times in 1,108 Posts
ivank has a reputation beyond reputeivank has a reputation beyond reputeivank has a reputation beyond reputeivank has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Swiss Code of Obligation - question....

Moderator Note : This post was originally in response to a thread asking about the enforceability of additional costs to recover a debt when it has been assigned to a debt recovery agency. The gist of the article is that nobody can be forced to employ an agent (e.g. the debtor cannot be forced to employ a recovery agent). The costs must not be passed the debtor.

It's not part of OR, but in a different code.

Art. 27 Abs. 3 SchKG: "Niemand kann verpflichtet werden, einen gewerbsmässigen Vertreter zu bestellen. Die Kosten der Vertretung dürfen nicht dem Schuldner überbunden werden."

Last edited by mirfield; 12.01.2017 at 18:54. Reason: Added context
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank ivank for this useful post:
Old 06.09.2017, 14:20
mirfield's Avatar
Moddy McModface
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Basel
Posts: 8,687
Groaned at 59 Times in 53 Posts
Thanked 9,419 Times in 3,479 Posts
mirfield has a reputation beyond reputemirfield has a reputation beyond reputemirfield has a reputation beyond reputemirfield has a reputation beyond reputemirfield has a reputation beyond reputemirfield has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Additional Charges by Debt Recovery Agencies - Not Enforceable

A recentish addition to the Consumer Rights FAQ (well, added since I last saw them)


17. Can debt collection agencies charge debtors debt collection fees (losses due to default)?

Cases in which debt collection fees have been contractually agreed

In principle, binding provision can be made in a contract for debt collection fees to be paid and their amount can also be fixed. If fees are stipulated in a company’s general terms and conditions of business, Article 8 of the Unfair Competition Act and the “rule on unusual provisions” must be observed (see FAQ 7). If fees are excessively high, the court may order them to be reduced in accordance with Article 163 paragraph 3 of the Swiss Code of Obligations (CO).

Cases in which debt collection fees have not been contractually agreed

There is no clear case law as yet on the issue of whether and under what circumstances a creditor or debt collection agency as its representative can demand that a debtor pay the agency’s costs (fees, expenses etc.), although this appears to have a basis in Article 106 CO. According to legal experts and the available case law, the following principles apply:

- In the case of financial debts, losses due to default need only be reimbursed to the extent that the costs exceed the statutory or contractual default interest. If the reimbursement of losses due to default is stipulated, it is not simply added to the default interest.

- The creditor must provide documentary proof to substantiate a claim for losses due to default.

- The cost of an initial reminder cannot be claimed back, unless this is stipulated in a contract or in a law, such as Article 20 paragraph 1 of the Insurance Contracts Act and Article 34a paragraph 2 of the Ordinance on Old Age and Survivors‘ Insurance. The costs incurred by the debtor in their own efforts to collect the debt cannot normally be reclaimed. However, losses due to default may include the cost of instructing a debt collection agency. It must however be necessary in the case concerned that an agency is involved.

- Article 27 paragraph 3 of the Federal Act on Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy does not exclude the possibility of making contractual provision for passing on the costs of a debt collection agency to the debtor, provided they relate to the process of issuing reminders and ultimatums. The guiding principle underlying the legislation – that it should be normally possible to collect debts without having to involve a professional agency – can however be applied to the process of issuing reminders and ultimatums and taken into account in deciding whether it was reasonable to involve a debt collection agency.
Reply With Quote
Old 06.09.2017, 17:37
arz arz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Zurich Witikon
Posts: 144
Groaned at 17 Times in 14 Posts
Thanked 104 Times in 67 Posts
arz is considered a nuisancearz is considered a nuisancearz is considered a nuisance
Re: Additional Charges by Debt Recovery Agencies - Not Enforceable

I had at least 3 occasions where Itrium Justitia (debt collection agency) tried to charge me "processing costs", normally, like extra 1/3 of the debt amount. My legal insurance directed me to this page that contains an example letter, basically saying "I'm happy to pay the debt and interest, but charging processing costs is illegal, go away!"
Works like a charm

Last edited by arz; 06.09.2017 at 17:38. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debt recovery pinkkann Business & entrepreneur 0 29.08.2014 17:40
Avoiding astronomical car hire additional insurance charges PaddyG Insurance 8 20.08.2014 17:41
Additional charges from Hertz vivoforta Complaints corner 29 26.01.2013 13:18
[Rental] Additional charges? FlowerRose Housing in general 2 18.06.2009 18:58

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:27.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0