( following on from another thread )

VPL =
... a joy to behold ( so to speak )
... an abomination upon the eyes.


debate and discuss

LOL...this is what I thought of.
Yes, Im a nerd.

On a nice, firm bottom, it's a delight, on all others it's a no no...

for me it's sort of a visual programing language.... but not the one you are thinking of.

There are other kinds ?

I never notice them.

You, good sir, definitely, do not want to know what I am thinking of.

Lol! That's what I thought it was about too!

You place the validity of VPL on your definition of a beautiful bottom, being nice and firm.

I personally object to this as I prefer a somewhat more substantial bottom that has just the right amount of wiggle and a lot more curve.

With or without VPL?

With... or without.

commando.

Maybe there is something wrong with my eyes, I just don't see the pantyline in the wiki picture.

My eyes...MY EYES !!!

Fret not, young miss.
Its a guy thing to notice things like this.
Like its a girl thing to notice things like the print on a dress...or the color of the mascara.

She is wearing a g-string and not normal knickers; you may be looking in the wrong place.

It took me a little while to see it too. She has them pulled up rather high.

AAAhhh now.... well, you'd have to look really closely to see it.

for those with vision problems.. here is something a little more in your face ( so to speak )

[IMG][/IMG]

EDIT... wow.. that was actually about the best photo... aw well.

In her case it isn't a line thing but more a transparent see throw of it.