 | | | 
03.05.2011, 11:45
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: A moving target...
Posts: 878
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 950 Times in 448 Posts
| | Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...Falklands.html
After enjoying watching Britain going back to doing what it does best last week I truly hope that this story does not turn out to be true. It would undermine all the good vibes built during the royal wedding for the country to be so arrogant as to deploy William to the Falklands during the 30 year anniversary of the conflict. It would be the diplomatic equivalent of inviting the Argentines to war - only this time I believe the British armed forces are rather less well equipped. Not that I've failed to be astonished by the arrogance of the Ministry of Defence in the past.
| 
03.05.2011, 11:57
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Roundn'about Basel
Posts: 7,231
Groaned at 105 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 9,934 Times in 4,178 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands
Why are you so concerned with this non-story.
1. HRH is a serving officer in the RAF, why shouldn't he be posted?
2. Do you really think that the Royal Wedding has helped warm relations with Argentina?
3. Do you really think that the UK/MOD/FO give a toss what the Argies think about it?
4. More to the point, do you think that posting him there is not purposefully reinforcing the message that the Falklands are UK's?
5. I'm betting that we'd still whip their butts if there was another fight over the Falklands, otherwise don't you think they'd already have tried again?
__________________
Never let right or wrong get in the way of a good opinion
| The following 4 users would like to thank Carlos R for this useful post: | | 
03.05.2011, 12:07
|  | Member | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Basel Land
Posts: 107
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 49 Times in 25 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | It would be the diplomatic equivalent of inviting the Argentines to war - only this time I believe the British armed forces are rather less well equipped. | | | | |
Agree with previous post - he's a serving member of the forces and will go where he's told, unless there is an issue of security and safety, and cost.
Am still laughing at the "less well equipped" comment.....but with a husband in the MOD for 25 years perhaps I would be slightly biased.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:10
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: A moving target...
Posts: 878
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 950 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Why are you so concerned with this non-story.
1. HRH is a serving officer in the RAF, why shouldn't he be posted?
2. Do you really think that the Royal Wedding has helped warm relations with Argentina?
3. Do you really think that the UK/MOD/FO give a toss what the Argies think about it?
4. More to the point, do you think that posting him there is not purposefully reinforcing the message that the Falklands are UK's?
5. I'm betting that we'd still whip their butts if there was another fight over the Falklands, otherwise don't you think they'd already have tried again? | | | | | Very simply I am concerned because quite frankly it appears to me to be the idea of an embarrassing old uncle. As I said I think it would be a very arrogant, albeit symbolic, gesture. I don't see any good coming from such a move whatsoever and rather a lot of negative press - remember the Argentines are far from alone in considering their claim to the Falklands to be more just than Britain's.
Take a look at this for example http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle7040245.ece
which includes "Washington refused to endorse British claims to sovereignty over the Falkland Islands yesterday as the diplomatic row over oil drilling in the South Atlantic intensified in London, Buenos Aires and at the UN."
Where oil is involved war can surely quickly follow. Sending Wills off to the hotspot will not calm the situation.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:18
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Die Südkürve
Posts: 1,790
Groaned at 11 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 1,030 Times in 552 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands
Eh? This is hardly specific to the Royals, this is an issue that is faced by any married couple where one half is in the military.
Prince or not, he's in the service of and commissioned by The Queen and will go where the Service requires him to be, I'm sure.
| This user would like to thank terryhall for this useful post: | | 
03.05.2011, 12:20
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Pensier, Fribourg
Posts: 9,243
Groaned at 118 Times in 102 Posts
Thanked 16,857 Times in 5,912 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Very simply I am concerned because quite frankly it appears to me to be the idea of an embarrassing old uncle. | | | | | Talking of embarassing old Uncles, didn't Prince Andrew serve in the Falklands?
| This user would like to thank PaddyG for this useful post: | | 
03.05.2011, 12:22
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: A moving target...
Posts: 878
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 950 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands
I think some of the responders to my original post have misinterpreted my criticism - it is not directed at Prince William as I am well aware he is not the decision maker in this one. My criticism is directed at the misguided foolishness of whoever would make the decision to deploy him to the Falklands. It would be a wholly unnecessary and potentially very damaging "F U" to the Argentines and would benefit nobody - apart from providing potentially a brief burst of patriotic pride for readers of tabloids.
I am simply saying "Why pick at old wounds?" It is certainly not worth risking the UK's claim to the oil reserves down their to prove some sort of point. As far as ill-equipped goes I am thinking of the fact that in '82 the UK armed forces were not heavily engaged in the Middle East.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:30
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Geneva
Posts: 767
Groaned at 15 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 965 Times in 440 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | My criticism is directed at the misguided foolishness of whoever would make the decision to deploy him to the Falklands. It would be a wholly unnecessary and potentially very damaging "F U" to the Argentines and would benefit nobody - apart from providing potentially a brief burst of patriotic pride for readers of tabloids. | | | | | Hardly foolish, he has to serve somewhere, and to be seen to be treated as an equal to the other pilots so why shouldn't he go to the Falklands?
There is no 'F U' to the Argies, I don't see where you are drawing this from to be honest.
And for sure, no one in the UK will be cheering that he's over there. The war was 30 years ago, the pride of that victory is long gone. The Falklands have cone back to being what they always were, a few islands a long way away.
Now if he went to Afghanistan, then that would be a story..
| This user would like to thank 17clarence for this useful post: | | 
03.05.2011, 12:37
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: A moving target...
Posts: 878
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 950 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | There is no 'F U' to the Argies, I don't see where you are drawing this from to be honest. | | | | | From the original article which I posted the link too!
"Speculation two years ago that the Prince could be sent to the Falklands prompted condemnation from Argentina's foreign minister, Jorge Taina."
I'm surprised I'm the only one here who seems to consider this an arrogant move, were it to happen.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:39
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Roundn'about Basel
Posts: 7,231
Groaned at 105 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 9,934 Times in 4,178 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | "Speculation two years ago that the Prince could be sent to the Falklands prompted condemnation from Argentina's foreign minister, Jorge Taina." | | | | | <scatches head>
What exactly would you expect the Argentinian Foreign Minister to say?
| 
03.05.2011, 12:43
|  | Member | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Basel Land
Posts: 107
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 49 Times in 25 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands
Yes but in 1982 there was one runway on Port Stanley not even long enough I believe for a Jet to take off, a token military force and HMS Endurance.
The military presence in the Falklands, South Georgia and the Ascension Islands has been boosted somewhat since then especially the development of Mount Pleasant. I believe they are also a lot more "alert" to an attack since the invasion.
To me it's less about the arrogance of the MOD and more about the fact that history is repeating itself - struggling leader, needs a diversion, "hey why not the Falkland Islands, that'll get the people back on my side and win me another term in office"
What never seems to come up is the opinion of the Falklanders. If we are going tit for tat on who got there first, hmmm well Argentina as a country didn't even exist then did it? How far back do we want to go...do the USA want to "give back" New Mexico?
The key matter is, the people living on those islands the "Falklanders" were asked if they wanted to remain an overseas "UK Territory" and they said yes. They don't want to be part of Argentina. It's not even ours to "give". As part of a UK Overseas territory they rely on the UK MOD as part of their homeland security. I don't remember the Argentinian Government giving the people residing on the islands an option in 1982.
As for sending William - it's probably seen as one of the lighter tasks as he can't do combat duties. Generally a big thing isn't made of it, most people weren't even aware he was on Anglesey.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:45
|  | Modulo 2 | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 15,158
Groaned at 309 Times in 265 Posts
Thanked 23,420 Times in 9,525 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | ...To me it's less about the arrogance of the MOD and more about the fact that history is repeating itself - struggling leader, needs a diversion, "hey why not the Falkland Islands, that'll get the people back on my side and win me another term in office" ... | | | | | Sorry, are you talking about Cristina Fernández de Kirchner or David Cameron?
| 
03.05.2011, 12:50
|  | Member | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Basel Land
Posts: 107
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 49 Times in 25 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands
..both...possibly...
Well it worked for his Auntie Maggie...
| 
03.05.2011, 12:55
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Geneva
Posts: 767
Groaned at 15 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 965 Times in 440 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Y
As for sending William - it's probably seen as one of the lighter tasks as he can't do combat duties. Generally a big thing isn't made of it, most people weren't even aware he was on Anglesey. | | | | | On a Saturday night Anglesey is probably more dangerous than the Falklands.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:58
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands
Erm. The Falkland Islands is a British Overseas Territory. Why wouldn't the RAF go there? Prince William is being deployed to....a place. If he doesn't want to go, he can resign his commission. I don't get the story. And if the Argentinians....or even the entire Southern Hemisphere has a problem with it, there isn't much they can do about it.
| 
03.05.2011, 12:59
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | <scatches head>
What exactly would you expect the Argentinian Foreign Minister to say? | | | | | That and "come try our steak, it's the best!"
| The following 4 users would like to thank for this useful post: | | 
03.05.2011, 13:08
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: A moving target...
Posts: 878
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 950 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Erm. The Falkland Islands is a British Overseas Territory. Why wouldn't the RAF go there? Prince William is being deployed to....a place. If he doesn't want to go, he can resign his commission. I don't get the story. And if the Argentinians....or even the entire Southern Hemisphere has a problem with it, there isn't much they can do about it. | | | | | When did I say the RAF shouldn't go there?
There is a huge difference between maintaining business as usual there and sending the future king to serve there even if this is purely a symbolic difference. There are potentially huge OIL reserves down there.
Right now we clearly see the one thing sure to bring normally peaceful nations to war is OIL. This situation will not get any easier, the black stuff is disappearing fast, being gulped down in increasing quantities and rocketing in price.
Many nations would view the deployment of William to the Falklands as a somewhat provacative symbolic gesture. It would not garner the UK any extra support in the UN for its claim to the Falklands. I see the UK standing to lose support for such a move and gaining nothing. The Empire is long gone and to behave like this could provide a very costly reminder of this fact.
| 
03.05.2011, 13:14
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Geneva
Posts: 767
Groaned at 15 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 965 Times in 440 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Many nations would view the deployment of William to the Falklands as a somewhat provacative symbolic gesture. It would not garner the UK any extra support in the UN for its claim to the Falklands. I see the UK standing to lose support for such a move and gaining nothing. The Empire is long gone and to behave like this could provide a very costly reminder of this fact. | | | | | The people of the Falklands want to stay a British territory. End of story. Nothing to do with the UN whatsoever, and nothing to do with the Empire, it's just a serviceman getting posted somewhere.
If the Argies want to get het up, they can, but it's a NON STORY.
You can flog it as much as you want, it ain't going anywhere.
| The following 2 users would like to thank 17clarence for this useful post: | | 
03.05.2011, 13:16
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: City by the Bay
Posts: 2,357
Groaned at 96 Times in 56 Posts
Thanked 3,205 Times in 1,227 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Many nations would view the deployment of William to the Falklands as a somewhat provacative symbolic gesture. | | | | | Who, exactly, other than the Argentinians (maybe)? | Quote: | |  | | | It would not garner the UK any extra support in the UN for its claim to the Falklands. I see the UK standing to lose support for such a move and gaining nothing. The Empire is long gone and to behave like this could provide a very costly reminder of this fact. | | | | | Who cares what the UN thinks? Ownership is 9/10'ths of the law. The current citizenry has no desire to be part of Argentinia. Britain owns it. If the UN cared, they shouldn't have told Argentinia to pull their troops out.
| 
03.05.2011, 13:26
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: A moving target...
Posts: 878
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 950 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: Royal couple face separation if Prince William deploys to Falklands | Quote: | |  | | | Who, exactly, other than the Argentinians (maybe)? | | | | | Just Google and you can find lots of info including:
The obvious stuff such as Chavez http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wor...01002315554704
But also items such as "the word on the wire via emails between ex-senior officers from the UK forces is that USAN Union of South American Nations planning a diplomatic 'assault' on the UK (including sanctions on exports) in an effort to 'restore the Malvinas to their rightful owners.'"
I go back to my original point. What purpose does it serve to make the provactive gesture of posting Prince William to the Falklands?
And put aside rights, wrongs, national pride, and all other points, take a big step back from the detail and answer for me please what the UK's net gain from this posting would be? I can't help but see the balance to be weighted to the downside.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:21. | |