 | | 
17.11.2011, 09:39
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Zurich
Posts: 583
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 280 Times in 173 Posts
| | EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines | 
17.11.2011, 09:48
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines
these machines, aren't they supposed to improve security ?
| 
17.11.2011, 09:53
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Zurich
Posts: 583
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 280 Times in 173 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines
yes but at what cost? better solutions and technology is available.
| 
17.11.2011, 10:43
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: north
Posts: 6,132
Groaned at 218 Times in 138 Posts
Thanked 5,100 Times in 2,636 Posts
| | | Quote: | |  | | | | | | | | UK is part of EU.
However I have reservations on the sources of the article as no agency or actual source is quoted
| 
17.11.2011, 11:57
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Zurich
Posts: 583
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 280 Times in 173 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines
you can see the full Press Release from the EU Commission here http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleases...guiLanguage=en | This user would like to thank we_da_man for this useful post: | | 
17.11.2011, 12:19
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: DK - previously Zug
Posts: 3,321
Groaned at 168 Times in 122 Posts
Thanked 6,707 Times in 2,237 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines | Quote: | |  | | | | | | | | Reading comprehension failure, buddy. They placed new rules restricting how they are used, but they are certainly not banned.
Edit: well, reading comprehension failure on the part of the reporters, anyway. The articles do claim that they are banned, but as seen in the press release the OP later linked, they are not actually banned, just restricted.
| 
17.11.2011, 12:25
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines | Quote: | |  | | | yes but at what cost? better solutions and technology is available. | | | | | What is the cost of better security?
| 
17.11.2011, 12:36
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Zurich
Posts: 583
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 280 Times in 173 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines
I was talking about long term health cost with exposure to harmful x-ray especially to young children.
| 
17.11.2011, 12:38
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines | Quote: | |  | | | I was talking about long term health cost with exposure to harmful x-ray especially to young children. | | | | | From walking through a x-ray machine say once or twice a year maybe slightly more?
| 
17.11.2011, 12:44
|  | Member | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Enge, Zürich
Posts: 126
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 64 Times in 42 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines | Quote: | |  | | | I was talking about long term health cost with exposure to harmful x-ray especially to young children. | | | | | Which there isn't. It's safe for children, and even pregnant women.
The radiation exposure is equal to around 5 mins of normal background radiation, and a tiny % of the radiation exposure when actually flying.
| The following 2 users would like to thank cheshmatt for this useful post: | | 
17.11.2011, 13:14
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,094
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 1,387 Times in 550 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines
The so-called 'testing' for full body scanners is dodgy at best. We're not comparing like-for-like in the sense of how our bodies absorb radiation in-air and via other means in comparison with the airport scanner.
If there's any doubt, that's enough for me to say "no."
I miscarried due to the supposedly safe lower back x-rays I received at a vulnerable time (between conception and implantation). The result was incomplete implantation, which several weeks later meant I lost the baby.
I'm pregnant again at around 19/20 weeks and I would refuse to walk through a scanner. For a brief European flight, I wore a lead vest.
See attached letter, which might be interesting. =)
| This user would like to thank little_isabella for this useful post: | | 
17.11.2011, 13:29
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Zürich
Posts: 687
Groaned at 23 Times in 19 Posts
Thanked 757 Times in 331 Posts
| | | Quote: | |  | | | The so-called 'testing' for full body scanners is dodgy at best. We're not comparing like-for-like in the sense of how our bodies absorb radiation in-air and via other means in comparison with the airport scanner.
If there's any doubt, that's enough for me to say "no."
I miscarried due to the supposedly safe lower back x-rays I received at a vulnerable time (between conception and implantation). The result was incomplete implantation, which several weeks later meant I lost the baby.
I'm pregnant again at around 19/20 weeks and I would refuse to walk through a scanner. For a brief European flight, I wore a lead vest.
See attached letter, which might be interesting. =) | | | | | Lead vest, huh? How long did it take to explain that one to security?
| 
17.11.2011, 14:04
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,094
Groaned at 18 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 1,387 Times in 550 Posts
| | Re: EU Bans Airport X-Ray Machines | Quote: | |  | | | Lead vest, huh? How long did it take to explain that one to security? | | | | | No problems at all. I did two return London-Zurich flights where I brought it on board. I didn't even receive an extra search of any sort. Obviously, they can't scan through it. They open the case, see it and inspect it, plus ask why I have it. I simply explained I was pregnant and it was for radiation protection.
I had a harder time in the air with the weird looks from passengers. ;p
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:33. | |