 | | | 
28.07.2012, 17:10
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Quaint Wädenswil, Zürich, CH
Posts: 8,147
Groaned at 27 Times in 20 Posts
Thanked 7,036 Times in 3,912 Posts
| | World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China )
The Three Gorges Dam is fully operational, and the power it generates is equivalent to that given by 15 nuclear reactors.
Well done China! | 
28.07.2012, 17:45
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 21,717
Groaned at 386 Times in 298 Posts
Thanked 16,655 Times in 9,407 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China )
Yeah, but how many people were displaced to create the lake and dam in the first place, how much wildlife and eco-system has been destroyed for it. | The following 4 users would like to thank Medea Fleecestealer for this useful post: | | 
28.07.2012, 18:08
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2011 Location: Zurich
Posts: 82
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 43 Times in 23 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Yeah, but how many people were displaced to create the lake and dam in the first place, how much wildlife and eco-system has been destroyed for it. | | | | | Exactly. Hydro power is far from being a magic solution, taking huge areas under reservoirs and often changing the landscape quite drastically (combining many rivers into one etc.). According to wikipedia 1.24 million people were relocated for the three gorges plant.
On the other hand, nuclear power is also not as bad as a lot of people think (imo). It emits practically no green house gases and with the reasonable high demands for security, is very safe. From electricity point of view, nuclear power is quite nice, since you can often build it quite close to areas of consumption.
Go nuclear!
(partly joking, nuclear is no dream come true either)
| This user would like to thank karih for this useful post: | | 
28.07.2012, 18:54
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 9,169
Groaned at 171 Times in 154 Posts
Thanked 25,643 Times in 6,892 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China )
It's relatively easy to complete huge engineering projects when you don't care about (a) people or (b) the environment.
| The following 3 users would like to thank adrianlondon for this useful post: | | 
28.07.2012, 21:25
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Glattbrugg
Posts: 19,023
Groaned at 333 Times in 258 Posts
Thanked 11,716 Times in 6,858 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Yeah, but how many people were displaced to create the lake and dam in the first place, how much wildlife and eco-system has been destroyed for it. | | | | | Officially 1,24 and by other estimates up to 1.5 mio people had to be relocated. Archeological treasures had to be evacuated, just as in case of Lake Nasser south of Aswan. In case of Lake Nasser, wildlife not only recovered but that sizeable lake is now home to fish of sorts not present before. The eco-system may even be improved. But you only will see the longterm effects after a few decades.
| The following 2 users would like to thank Wollishofener for this useful post: | | 
29.07.2012, 23:37
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 9,831
Groaned at 434 Times in 375 Posts
Thanked 18,127 Times in 9,648 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Exactly. Hydro power is far from being a magic solution, taking huge areas under reservoirs and often changing the landscape quite drastically (combining many rivers into one etc.). According to wikipedia 1.24 million people were relocated for the three gorges plant.
On the other hand, nuclear power is also not as bad as a lot of people think (imo). It emits practically no green house gases and with the reasonable high demands for security, is very safe. From electricity point of view, nuclear power is quite nice, since you can often build it quite close to areas of consumption.
Go nuclear! 
(partly joking, nuclear is no dream come true either) | | | | | About "It emits practically no green house gases "
True but quite a lot is generated by the building process & materials required.
| 
30.07.2012, 04:19
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 11,838
Groaned at 299 Times in 256 Posts
Thanked 22,323 Times in 8,105 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Yeah, but how many people were displaced to create the lake and dam in the first place, how much wildlife and eco-system has been destroyed for it. | | | | | How many people and animals were affected when Fukushima blew up? That were only two reactors, this dam has the power of 15 reactors.
P.S: The locals never complained that the got relocated - the problem was that the promised compensation payments apparently not really arrived where they should.
| 
30.07.2012, 06:57
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Baden region
Posts: 2,173
Groaned at 14 Times in 13 Posts
Thanked 2,439 Times in 1,076 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Well done China! | | | | | Swiss companies worked on this as well | The following 2 users would like to thank Rangatiranui for this useful post: | | 
30.07.2012, 10:15
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Roundn'about Basel
Posts: 7,238
Groaned at 105 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 9,934 Times in 4,178 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Yeah, but how many people were displaced to create the lake and dam in the first place, how much wildlife and eco-system has been destroyed for it. | | | | | Eco-systems recover and adapt. | Quote: | |  | | | Go nuclear!  | | | | | Joke or not, what a load of tripe. Tell me, what do you do with the radioactive waste once it is used up?
I'm not specifically anti-nuclear, but the only real "cost" here is that of the people who were displaced.
Once that is settled (no pun intended), the rest is a win/win.
| 
30.07.2012, 10:57
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 9,169
Groaned at 171 Times in 154 Posts
Thanked 25,643 Times in 6,892 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | I'm not specifically anti-nuclear, but the only real "cost" here is that of the people who were displaced.. | | | | | Yeah, nothing else. And as Treverus says above, it's really great even though there's a small hiccup of people not being compensated.
So, another successful large scale project of taking money from the population (in lost land, farming income, property) and putting it in the hands of the already rich (costruction firm owners, public company owners, local and central government officials).
it really wouldn't have cost much to have a proper consultation/compenstion package, but with everyone telling the Chinese government what a fanatstic job they're doing, why should they bother.
| This user would like to thank adrianlondon for this useful post: | | 
30.07.2012, 10:59
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Roundn'about Basel
Posts: 7,238
Groaned at 105 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 9,934 Times in 4,178 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | it really wouldn't have cost much to have a proper consultation/compenstion package, but with everyone telling the Chinese government what a fanatstic job they're doing, why should they bother. | | | | | I know, Adrian, it isn't great.
But I would rather an motherEFing big HEP plant, rather than 15 nuclear powerstations run by a State who like to be economical with the truth, or for that matter x number of coal-powered plants belching out enough power to feed China's evergrowing energy demands.
| 
30.07.2012, 11:13
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 12,800
Groaned at 204 Times in 181 Posts
Thanked 18,515 Times in 7,557 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China )
Here's some interesting facts:
HEP has caused more deaths in the last fifty years than nuclear.
e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
Number of deaths through Fukushima zero. Number of additional deaths of the next fifty years maybe 40 worldwide (statistically insignificant), making it impossible to attribute any one death to Fukushima. (Source, New Scientist 18 July 2012 )
Coal is the biggest killer by a huge margin - see also New Scientist March 2011 ).
Bloody scientists, confusing the issues with facts.
HEP produces significant quantities of CO2 and Methane. (Source New Scientist February 2005). | Quote: |  | | | The green image of hydro power as a benign alternative to fossil fuels is false, says Éric Duchemin, a consultant for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). "Everyone thinks hydro is very clean, but this is not the case," he says.
Hydroelectric dams produce significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane, and in some cases produce more of these greenhouse gases than power plants running on fossil fuels | | | | | Bloody scientists, confusing the issues with facts.
__________________
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!
| The following 7 users would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | | 
30.07.2012, 11:17
|  | Unbridled Mod | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Town or region
Posts: 11,441
Groaned at 628 Times in 403 Posts
Thanked 16,025 Times in 6,275 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | HEP has caused more deaths in the last fifty years than nuclear.
e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
Number of deaths through Fukushima zero. Number of additional deaths of the next fifty years maybe 40 worldwide (statistically insignificant), making it impossible to attribute any one death to Fukushima. (Source, New Scientist 18 July 2012 )
Coal is the biggest killer by a huge margin - see also New Scientist March 2011 ). 
HEP produces significant quantities of CO2 and Methane. (Source New Scientist February 2005). | | | | | So, coal seems pretty feasible to me.  On a more serious note, I'm not a fan of "so called" green energy, as in fact it is anything but green and rather expensive at at. I don't mind nuclear energy at all and taking all things in consideration, it does seem to be the cheapest as well as one of the safest solution out there.
| The following 2 users would like to thank lost_inbroad for this useful post: | | 
30.07.2012, 11:17
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 9,169
Groaned at 171 Times in 154 Posts
Thanked 25,643 Times in 6,892 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | rather than 15 nuclear powerstations run by a State who like to be economical with the truth | | | | | I'm actually a big fan of nuclear power (despite recent failures) but you're right. China needs lots of power, and like you I'd rather they have a hydro-electric plant than more coal mines. The pollution coming from coal (at the plant, and people using coal directly at home for heating) is awful.
| This user would like to thank adrianlondon for this useful post: | | 
30.07.2012, 11:34
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 14,188
Groaned at 275 Times in 181 Posts
Thanked 17,502 Times in 7,403 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Eco-systems recover and adapt.
Joke or not, what a load of tripe. Tell me, what do you do with the radioactive waste once it is used up?
| | | | | reprocess it or store it for several thousand years. no biggie.
the alternative is to grind it up into tiny particles and then release it into the atmosphere.  "what are you crazy" you say? that's exactly what we do with coal power... http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/780347.html | 
30.07.2012, 11:35
| Junior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Zurich, (from 06/2010)
Posts: 35
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | How many people and animals were affected when Fukushima blew up? That were only two reactors, this dam has the power of 15 reactors. | | | | | | Quote: | |  | | | I know, Adrian, it isn't great.
But I would rather an motherEFing big HEP plant, rather than 15 nuclear powerstations run by a State who like to be economical with the truth, or for that matter x number of coal-powered plants belching out enough power to feed China's evergrowing energy demands. | | | | | Sorry, i am not pro nuclear. Actually, i am sceptical about it at least for economical and political reasons and I wouldn't like Italy ,my country, to start nuclear energy program.
But i think that the common perception of danger (deaths and effect on health) related to nuclear energy compared to hydroelectric energy is misleading.
Two examples that i know:
171000 deaths : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
2000 deaths : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajont_Dam
Usually we think to Hydroelectric as a very save source of energy, and we consider only the effect of displacing people, but unfortunately citing from the OP's link:
" Over 360 million people live within the watershed of the Yangtze River. If the one in one thousand chance of a dam collapse occurred, the millions of people who live downstream would be endangered."
Have to say that the "1/1000 chance" seems exaggerated.
My 2 cents.
| 
30.07.2012, 11:37
|  | Unbridled Mod | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Town or region
Posts: 11,441
Groaned at 628 Times in 403 Posts
Thanked 16,025 Times in 6,275 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Sorry, i am not pro nuclear. Actually, i am sceptical about it at least for economical and political reasons and I wouldn't like Italy ,my country, to start nuclear energy program. | | | | | Trust me on this one, a nuclear program would be the least of the worries in Italy... | 
30.07.2012, 11:47
| Junior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Zurich, (from 06/2010)
Posts: 35
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | | Trust me ... | | | | | Why should I ? | The following 2 users would like to thank francesco_ud for this useful post: | | 
30.07.2012, 12:02
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China ) | Quote: | |  | | |
Well done China!
| | | | | I guess that China is not too worried that this "super-power generating" dam is built on a geologically unstable region. What would happen downstream from these dams should an earthquake collapse a dam wall?
But then again, I am sure they are fully aware of it... perhaps it is a form of population control.
| 
30.07.2012, 13:15
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baselland
Posts: 12,800
Groaned at 204 Times in 181 Posts
Thanked 18,515 Times in 7,557 Posts
| | Re: World's largest hydropower project goes fully operational ( China )
Nuclear power is the only realistic way, currently, to meet future power demands. Fast breeder reactors convert readily available U-238 or Thorium-232 to fissionable Uranium - producing more than they consume of U-235. Thorium reactors may be the way forward. Of course, the holy grail is fusion. But that's been twenty years away for a long time...
The amount of waste is really very very small - but there's an irrational fear of radioactivity, coupled with a very rational distrust of politicians. Looking at it objectively, nuclear power is the cleanest source of energy we have - certainly very low in carbon emissions. Greenies should, in fact, be in favour of it, but there's been too much politics and investment in being anti-nuclear because of nuclear weapons for that to happen anytime soon.
__________________
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!
| The following 5 users would like to thank NotAllThere for this useful post: | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:56. | |