Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #581  
Old 08.10.2015, 13:57
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 7,310
Groaned at 210 Times in 168 Posts
Thanked 12,975 Times in 5,331 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
Oh that sounds easy. But I don't think the Supreme Court can singlehandedly remove a Bill of Rights amendment. That could cover steps 1 to 3 in this video. But look at step #5:

Gun free America in 5 Easy Steps
Don'tcha just love the gross simplification and fear-mongering in that NRA-sponsored video -- and your mindless parroting of the lies it propagates.

So the makers of the video claim that various heavily-armed government (again, the big, bad government is out to get you, so you'd better be armed to the teeth to resist it!) agencies would have to smash their way through every private residence in America to enforce gun control legislation. Really? You mean, just as they have in those few cities in the U.S. where some form of gun control exists? And just as the Australian Federal Police did in Australia in 1996/97?

No, Phos, they didn't. And gun legislation didn't remove every firearm from Australia. Nor did it make all firearms illegal, as your video sensationally and provocatively claims. But it did significantly reduce the number of firearms held in Australia, and it did significantly reduce gun crime and gun deaths in Australia. Inarguably and demonstrably, gun control saves lives. It has in Australia and it could in the U.S., if only spineless legislators would grow a pair.
Reply With Quote
  #582  
Old 08.10.2015, 14:49
Phos's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ZRH
Posts: 7,398
Groaned at 544 Times in 418 Posts
Thanked 10,130 Times in 5,411 Posts
Phos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

No, you miss the point, and resurfaces your emotional knee jerk reactionism. What that video is saying is that is what it would take for the US to effectively disarm the public. In other words, they can try and talk all they want, but it isn't going to happen.

Obama is exploring a different route, using information gathered on his Obamacare database, to identify people who are at risk of violnce. So at first, he is requesting confidential doctor/ patient information to identify certain comditions.

Except nobody really has any ideas what to look for first. They kind of need empathetic psychics that can predict future crimes and arrest the criminal before he commits a crime.

I think left leaning people have an implicit disconnect that keeps them from differentiating between wishful thinking and objective reality.
__________________
exceptio probat regulam
Reply With Quote
  #583  
Old 08.10.2015, 14:55
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 22,243
Groaned at 1,171 Times in 917 Posts
Thanked 25,141 Times in 12,037 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
Seriously, Phos, learn what your signature means or change it. Every time I read you bleating that anything but guns is responsible for mass (or other) shootings, I see your signature. Deepest irony.
What do sea snails have to do with guns?

Tom
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #584  
Old 08.10.2015, 15:10
dodgyken's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Democratic Republic Kenistan
Posts: 10,737
Groaned at 360 Times in 294 Posts
Thanked 19,403 Times in 7,402 Posts
dodgyken has a reputation beyond reputedodgyken has a reputation beyond reputedodgyken has a reputation beyond reputedodgyken has a reputation beyond reputedodgyken has a reputation beyond reputedodgyken has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

So to clarify:
1) You have the right to bear arms so that you can rise up against the government Goto 2
2) The government prevents this by having more and bigger guns Goto 3
3) The government is lobbyed intensively by pro-gun groups (including the NRA) to allow people to own guns for Goto 1

Reply With Quote
  #585  
Old 08.10.2015, 17:51
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 5,153
Groaned at 160 Times in 135 Posts
Thanked 6,569 Times in 3,373 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
This is actually the bit where Switzerland understood the Jeffersonian militia thing better than the US. The army here is de-facto the people. So the concept of the army fighting against the people doesn't play. If the people (or a sufficiently large subset thereof) were to take their guns and march to Bern, the government would be screwed.
Sorry, but history proves you wrong. For instance, the swiss army intentionally killed swiss workers during the "Generalstreik" in 1918. They shot into gatherings of protesting workes with the intent to kill. Some say CH was on the brink of civil war, with the army steadfastly defending the status quo.
Reply With Quote
  #586  
Old 08.10.2015, 18:03
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 9,253
Groaned at 181 Times in 156 Posts
Thanked 17,625 Times in 7,484 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
Sorry, but history proves you wrong. For instance, the swiss army intentionally killed swiss workers during the "Generalstreik" in 1918. They shot into gatherings of protesting workes with the intent to kill. Some say CH was on the brink of civil war, with the army steadfastly defending the status quo.
OK, I'd forgotten about that.

But just suppose there had been a civil war as you suggest, would there not then have been army people of all ranks and seniorities on both sides along with their training, expertes and equipment? This is a different situation to the usual type of civil war where a well equipped army gets to fight an ad hoc militia armed with pitchforks and scythes?
Reply With Quote
  #587  
Old 08.10.2015, 18:13
aSwissInTheUS's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Zurich area
Posts: 7,772
Groaned at 64 Times in 58 Posts
Thanked 11,204 Times in 5,090 Posts
aSwissInTheUS has a reputation beyond reputeaSwissInTheUS has a reputation beyond reputeaSwissInTheUS has a reputation beyond reputeaSwissInTheUS has a reputation beyond reputeaSwissInTheUS has a reputation beyond reputeaSwissInTheUS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
OK, I'd forgotten about that.

But just suppose there had been a civil war as you suggest, would there not then have been army people of all ranks and seniorities on both sides along with their training, expertes and equipment?
Back then? No, one side were factory workers which had hardly a rank higher than even Sergeant.
Reply With Quote
  #588  
Old 09.10.2015, 15:21
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 659
Groaned at 54 Times in 42 Posts
Thanked 593 Times in 329 Posts
lorena1 has a reputation beyond reputelorena1 has a reputation beyond reputelorena1 has a reputation beyond reputelorena1 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Unfortunately another shooting took place today morning at Northern Arizona Univ.. 4 were shot; 1 fatally. This marks the 46th school shooting in the US this year.
Reply With Quote
  #589  
Old 09.10.2015, 15:37
Tom1234's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kanton Luzern
Posts: 11,583
Groaned at 316 Times in 253 Posts
Thanked 16,068 Times in 6,577 Posts
Tom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
Unfortunately another shooting took place today morning at Northern Arizona Univ.. 4 were shot; 1 fatally. This marks the 46th school shooting in the US this year.
The teachers should be armed with rocket-propelled grenades. That would stop any shooting. And it's God's way, anyway.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank Tom1234 for this useful post:
  #590  
Old 09.10.2015, 15:57
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 7,310
Groaned at 210 Times in 168 Posts
Thanked 12,975 Times in 5,331 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
The teachers should be armed with rocket-propelled grenades. That would stop any shooting. And it's God's way, anyway.
Right on, brother. Although ICBMs would more reliably stop those baddies in the black hats from shooting up schools.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank 22 yards for this useful post:
  #591  
Old 09.10.2015, 16:31
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,981
Groaned at 68 Times in 51 Posts
Thanked 5,049 Times in 1,795 Posts
crazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
But I don't think the Supreme Court can singlehandedly remove a Bill of Rights amendment. L]
the current state of law regarding gun rights in the US is a fiction made up by the Supreme Court in the first place, and much of it only since Scalia was appointed. prior to Scalia, the Supreme Court had expressly rejected the notion of an individual, i.e. private, right to bear arms.

in other words, all the SCOTUS would have to do is reverse one or two prior decisions, the actual text of the 2nd Amendment is completely (and unfortunately) irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #592  
Old 09.10.2015, 16:39
Phos's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ZRH
Posts: 7,398
Groaned at 544 Times in 418 Posts
Thanked 10,130 Times in 5,411 Posts
Phos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
the current state of law regarding gun rights in the US is a fiction made up by the Supreme Court in the first place, and much of it only since Scalia was appointed. prior to Scalia, the Supreme Court had expressly rejected the notion of an individual, i.e. private, right to bear arms.

in other words, all the SCOTUS would have to do is reverse one or two prior decisions, the actual text of the 2nd Amendment is completely (and unfortunately) irrelevant.
Something like that would have to be done for the purpose of judicial activism rather than adjudication, which isn't really the roll, purpose or character of the SCOTUS.

I'm sure there will be all kinds of attempts in some other ways. Obama is expected to announce one shortly, likely around registration and background checks, although this was done before. It was practically ignored and was to no effect.
Reply With Quote
  #593  
Old 09.10.2015, 17:19
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 7,310
Groaned at 210 Times in 168 Posts
Thanked 12,975 Times in 5,331 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
It was practically ignored and was to no effect.
And this is exactly the point. If lawmakers and law enforcers want to decrease gun violence, they have to ENFORCE the laws that control guns. That's the whole story behind supposedly-strict Chicago's failure to curb gun crime.
Reply With Quote
  #594  
Old 09.10.2015, 17:34
Medea Fleecestealer's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Misery-Courtion
Posts: 17,882
Groaned at 301 Times in 233 Posts
Thanked 13,146 Times in 7,535 Posts
Medea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Guns may have stopped Holocaust if the German populace had been allowed to keep their weaponss. So says Republican Presidential hopful Ben Carson.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34485358

So, how many gun control laws do you think he'd sign into force if he became President?

Funny it doesn't seem to have much effect in stopping mass shootings, murders, etc, in the US. I wonder why?
Reply With Quote
  #595  
Old 09.10.2015, 17:37
Phos's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ZRH
Posts: 7,398
Groaned at 544 Times in 418 Posts
Thanked 10,130 Times in 5,411 Posts
Phos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
And this is exactly the point. If lawmakers and law enforcers want to decrease gun violence, they have to ENFORCE the laws that control guns. That's the whole story behind supposedly-strict Chicago's failure to curb gun crime.
I don't think you are aware of what those laws are, who applies them and how. There are laws on sales of guns require background checks for certain level of sellers, but the loophole is that anybody can be a seller, simply with an eBay account or a garage sale. How do you suppose these can be enforced, and who would enforce them? Here I suspect your expectations are quite disconnected from reality.

Furthermore, in regards to "gun culture", I find that most people into guns are also attracted to careers that are close to guns. So we are talking about the sheriffs, policemen, National Guardsmen, and the military personnel themselves are the ones who are adamant about gun ownership. These are the same as those who will be enforcing the law on themselves?

Finally, Americans do NOT have a problems with guns. They have a problem with violence. But until you understand that point of differentiation, what you repeatedly chant doesn't really address it.
__________________
exceptio probat regulam
Reply With Quote
  #596  
Old 09.10.2015, 17:50
Tom1234's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kanton Luzern
Posts: 11,583
Groaned at 316 Times in 253 Posts
Thanked 16,068 Times in 6,577 Posts
Tom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post

Finally, Americans do NOT have a problems with guns. They have a problem with violence.
I'm glad you see it like that.

What you fail to understand though is that if there were no guns but the population was armed with wooden spoons, or wet kippers, or chocolate teapots then this violence wouldn't be so bloody and the death count wouldn't be so high.

Your answer throughout this thread is to have even more guns.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Tom1234 for this useful post:
  #597  
Old 09.10.2015, 18:01
Phos's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ZRH
Posts: 7,398
Groaned at 544 Times in 418 Posts
Thanked 10,130 Times in 5,411 Posts
Phos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

And during that time of ancient history, they hacked each other to death instead. I think you folks have been playing John Lennon's "Imagine" song a little too often. At some point, you have to look at objective reality and see what is really there.

More guns is not my personal answer, my personal answer is to be sober and awake, and do what is best for your situation as you see fit. For those who were personally there at the Oregon shooting, and personally affected, this is their take on it:
Oregon Shooting Survivor Rejects Gun Control

Your take may be for the government to step in and social engineer the US. My take is for individuals to take personal responsibility for themselves.
__________________
exceptio probat regulam
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Phos for this useful post:
  #598  
Old 10.10.2015, 01:14
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,981
Groaned at 68 Times in 51 Posts
Thanked 5,049 Times in 1,795 Posts
crazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond reputecrazygringo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
Something like that would have to be done for the purpose of judicial activism rather than adjudication, which isn't really the roll, purpose or character of the SCOTUS.
the SCOTUS has always been about nothing more than judicial activism, everything else you read is window dressing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distri...mbia_v._Heller

like I said, everything that you think you believe about the 2nd Amendment is the result of judicial activism. sadly, the plot has been lost for so long that the vast majority of Americans actually believe that the 2nd Amendment says something that it plainly does not.
Reply With Quote
  #599  
Old 10.10.2015, 02:12
Phos's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ZRH
Posts: 7,398
Groaned at 544 Times in 418 Posts
Thanked 10,130 Times in 5,411 Posts
Phos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond reputePhos has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
the SCOTUS has always been about nothing more than judicial activism, everything else you read is window dressing:
You're in contempt of court!

While the term is pejorative of decisions one simply does not like, judicial activism is not the intended mode the SCOTUS is to deliberate in. They do have lots of constraints, or should, in regards to interpretations and precedents.

Anyway, I don't see the SCOTUS banning private firearms anytime soon. Do you? And even if they did, I don't see it possible for the goverment to confiscate them short of martial law.
Reply With Quote
  #600  
Old 10.10.2015, 04:18
22 yards's Avatar
Only in moderation
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 7,310
Groaned at 210 Times in 168 Posts
Thanked 12,975 Times in 5,331 Posts
22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute22 yards has a reputation beyond repute
Re: A shooting just happened in ( *fill in the blank * )

Quote:
View Post
And during that time of ancient history, they hacked each other to death instead.
One at a time -- not 20 in a single rampage, effectively by remote control. And it's a hell of a lot easier to take down a person armed with a club or knife than one armed with a gun.
Quote:
View Post
For those who were personally there at the Oregon shooting, and personally affected, this is their take on it
"THOSE" who were personally there? "THEIR" take on it? The article features an interview with ONE person who was there -- who expresses obvious uncertainty in the interview.

Grasping at straws much, Phos? Perhaps you'd like to revisit just who is being emotional in this debate?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank 22 yards for this useful post:
Reply

Tags
florida, gay, isis, killed, muslim students, shooting, usa




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
errepierre
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My boss is a.......(fill in the gap) goombie General off-topic 35 28.01.2011 15:55
Recreational Shooting in the Geneva canton MAWLER Sports / Fitness / Beauty / Wellness 9 31.08.2010 17:04
What just happened please i could not access the forum Sutter Forum support 44 25.05.2009 20:03
Do I need to fill in Tax forms for the US? Roe Finance/banking/taxation 14 18.06.2008 19:17
What's just happened to the Swiss Franc? Tim Finance/banking/taxation 7 08.05.2007 17:24


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0