 | | | 
12.04.2022, 14:58
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 12,570
Groaned at 746 Times in 628 Posts
Thanked 24,683 Times in 12,925 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | Finland theoretically being on their side is obviously not the same thing as being in NATO. If Finland were in NATO then NATO would be obliged to defend it in the event of any attack. With Finland in NATO, NATO can also position weapons systems and deterrents in Finland. Finland know they can't stand up to Russia in modern warfare so it makes perfect sense for them to get into NATO where they will not need to stand alone if attacked.
At this point, who cares about 'more friction' with Russia... the time for countries to organise these things is now while Russia have their military hands full with Ukraine and the ongoing sanctions. | | | | | Likely most of the Russian elite military who were sent to invade major targets in the first days of the war have been killed or injured, Russia can call on hundreds of thousands of reservists but think quantity, not quality.
It will be years before Russia can put together a sizeable professional army and even then with mostly Soviet era equipment. It is claimed Russia has huge reserves of such equipment, it is also claimed the soldiers have stripped them down to sell valuable items like the optics.
Russia's newest tank the T-14 has yet to appear in Ukraine, they never revealed how many they have; probably less than 100 - could be as few as twenty. Due to sanctions blocking the Russian import of western high technology the chances of Russia now building large numbers of modern weapons are slim.
| This user would like to thank marton for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:03
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Zurich
Posts: 14,255
Groaned at 1,470 Times in 967 Posts
Thanked 21,634 Times in 8,255 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | Likely most of the Russian elite military who were sent to invade major targets in the first days of the war have been killed or injured, Russia can call on hundreds of thousands of reservists but think quantity, not quality.
It will be years before Russia can put together a sizeable professional army and even then with mostly Soviet era equipment. It is claimed Russia has huge reserves of such equipment, it is also claimed the soldiers have stripped them down to sell valuable items like the optics.
Russia's newest tank the T-14 has yet to appear in Ukraine, they never revealed how many they have; probably less than 100 - could be as few as twenty. Due to sanctions blocking the Russian import of western high technology the chances of Russia now building large numbers of modern weapons are slim. | | | | | Your post does not change the fact that Russia could still beat Finland in any modern conventional war, should they put their mind to it.
| 
12.04.2022, 15:13
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 12,570
Groaned at 746 Times in 628 Posts
Thanked 24,683 Times in 12,925 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | That was my point and that is a NEGATIVE for NATO.
True but doubtful if it would happen as it would be too much provocation to Russia (in same way that US didn't accept missiles on Cuba). I'm not sure to what extent weapons/bases have been stationed in the recently joined countries - I presume little to none.
It's true that they are probably now too busy to respond immediately - in prior times there was more fear of Russia striking between applying and joining.
Though the US have made it clear that they would not be drawn into a war over Ukraine and that Ukraine wasn't within their vital interests. I doubt Finland would rank much higher in their priority list. | | | | | "little to none"?
From the NATO web site "Following Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, Allies have agreed to establish four more multinational battlegroups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia.
This brings the total number of multinational battlegroups to eight, extending all along NATO’s eastern flank – from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south."
A typical NATO battlegroup has tanks, infantry with armoured vehicles, heavy artillery, air defence, over 1,000 personnel, etc.
Lots more information in the NATO site if you are interested.
| 
12.04.2022, 15:18
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: ZH
Posts: 2,320
Groaned at 44 Times in 39 Posts
Thanked 4,730 Times in 1,870 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | Your post does not change the fact that Russia could still beat Finland in any modern conventional war, should they put their mind to it. | | | | | Now? They're bogged down in one quagmire, I don't think they'll be wanting a second front, especially with country with a strong national defence policy.
As Marton says, Russia's equipment isn't up to scratch, and we've seen their logistics and moral are dismal.
Probably the safest time to join NATO for exactly that reason.
| The following 2 users would like to thank Ato for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:20
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,041
Groaned at 37 Times in 30 Posts
Thanked 949 Times in 493 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?
There is a certain Russian pro-government Telegram channel, but the comment option is another matter... so I got banned today after posting about the fact that some medications are barely available in Russia... I posted very not so pro-government stuff before, nothing radical.. maybe because it comes from a Swiss number.. <shaking head>
| The following 2 users would like to thank Aleydis for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:22
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Zurich
Posts: 14,255
Groaned at 1,470 Times in 967 Posts
Thanked 21,634 Times in 8,255 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | Now? They're bogged down in one quagmire, I don't think they'll be wanting a second front, especially with country with a strong national defence policy.
As Marton says, Russia's equipment isn't up to scratch, and we've seen their logistics and moral are dismal. | | | | | Obviously I didn't mean now while engaged with Ukraine, Ato. I just meant generally speaking. Sigh. | Quote: | |  | | | Probably the safest time to join NATO for exactly that reason | | | | | That is exactly what I said in my post above.
| 
12.04.2022, 15:26
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: ZH
Posts: 2,320
Groaned at 44 Times in 39 Posts
Thanked 4,730 Times in 1,870 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | That is exactly what I said in my post above that you clearly didn't read properly, and yes obviously I mean they could beat Finland when not engaged with Ukraine. | | | | | Russia could still beat Finland in any modern conventional war*, should they put their mind to it.
*Except for now, which I forgot to mention and relied on mind reading for others to imply?
| This user would like to thank Ato for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:30
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Zurich
Posts: 14,255
Groaned at 1,470 Times in 967 Posts
Thanked 21,634 Times in 8,255 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | Russia could still beat Finland in any modern conventional war*, should they put their mind to it.
*Except for now, which I forgot to mention and relied on mind reading for others to imply? | | | | | It was clear from the context that it was a general statement.
| 
12.04.2022, 15:30
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: SZ
Posts: 4,346
Groaned at 434 Times in 312 Posts
Thanked 9,572 Times in 4,056 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | That was my point and that is a NEGATIVE for NATO. | | | | | If the obligation to defend allies was indeed such a NEGATIVE, there would be no NATO.
| 
12.04.2022, 15:34
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Baselland
Posts: 15,819
Groaned at 310 Times in 209 Posts
Thanked 20,280 Times in 8,534 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | "little to none"?
From the NATO web site "Following Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, Allies have agreed to establish four more multinational battlegroups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia.
This brings the total number of multinational battlegroups to eight, extending all along NATO’s eastern flank – from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south."
A typical NATO battlegroup has tanks, infantry with armoured vehicles, heavy artillery, air defence, over 1,000 personnel, etc.
Lots more information in the NATO site if you are interested. | | | | | I was referring to deployment of strategic systems such as nuclear weapons and air defence systems and permanent deployment of forces, not temporary deployments in response to the Ukraine conflict.
| This user would like to thank Phil_MCR for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:41
|  | Roastbeef & Yorkshire mod | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 15,264
Groaned at 319 Times in 274 Posts
Thanked 26,973 Times in 10,876 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | It was clear from the context that it was a general statement. | | | | | Was it? Obviously not or others wouldn’t have misinterpreted it.
I don’t think your posts are always as clear to others as you like to think they are.
| The following 4 users would like to thank Belgianmum for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:41
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Nyon
Posts: 8,568
Groaned at 540 Times in 399 Posts
Thanked 11,897 Times in 5,541 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?
I think Russia would struggle to beat Andorra at the moment.
| The following 3 users would like to thank bowlie for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 15:42
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Baselland
Posts: 15,819
Groaned at 310 Times in 209 Posts
Thanked 20,280 Times in 8,534 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | If the obligation to defend allies was indeed such a NEGATIVE, there would be no NATO. | | | | | It depends on the relative strengths of the parties to the pact. Initially it might have made sense, but I think NATO has over expanded, the credibility of Art.5 mutual defence is already stretched.
Voicing membership to Ukraine and Georgia just lead to invasion of those countries. Existing NATO members have little appetite to get involved there. Having seen what happened to Ukraine and Georgia, I'm not sure that it would be sensible to roll the dice with Finland.
| 
12.04.2022, 16:31
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: SZ
Posts: 4,346
Groaned at 434 Times in 312 Posts
Thanked 9,572 Times in 4,056 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | It depends on the relative strengths of the parties to the pact. Initially it might have made sense, but I think NATO has over expanded, the credibility of Art.5 mutual defence is already stretched.
Voicing membership to Ukraine and Georgia just lead to invasion of those countries. Existing NATO members have little appetite to get involved there. Having seen what happened to Ukraine and Georgia, I'm not sure that it would be sensible to roll the dice with Finland. | | | | | Yes, and I think FIN and SWE would be excellent members. Impeccable democracies, stable economies and modern militaries. Much more reliable than current members such as Hungary, if you ask me.
The 2008 communication was an utter mistake not by NATO as such as mostly by the US on one side and to a lesser degree Germany/France on the other. It was stupid to promise them membership without any realistic lane how to join. Either don't, or do it and follow up with a plan. I would argue that both countries at that time were light years away from being proper candidates.
| This user would like to thank komsomolez for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 17:08
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Lausanne
Posts: 656
Groaned at 51 Times in 30 Posts
Thanked 788 Times in 414 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | It was stupid to promise them membership without any realistic lane how to join. | | | | | In 2008 things looked a lot different than now, particularly in regards to Russia. Plus, nothing was really promised - this is politics after all. There was a clear opening and invitation to join the western block at some point in the future, and both Ukraine and Georgia were keen.
I don't think that was a mistake. After all, what was the alternative? It was either Nato or be at some point reintegrated in Putin's new old soviet union.
It might have been possible for Ukraine to become a truly neutral country as it is big enough and has enough resources to defend itself from its neighbors - but Ukraine wasn't and is not there yet. For Georgia armed neutrality is just not an option...
| The following 2 users would like to thank dandi for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 17:13
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2020 Location: Up there over the fog
Posts: 5,078
Groaned at 781 Times in 515 Posts
Thanked 4,942 Times in 2,625 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?
Correction, not 'if I have' but 'I have'
| 
12.04.2022, 17:57
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 12,570
Groaned at 746 Times in 628 Posts
Thanked 24,683 Times in 12,925 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | It depends on the relative strengths of the parties to the pact. Initially it might have made sense, but I think NATO has over expanded, the credibility of Art.5 mutual defence is already stretched.
Voicing membership to Ukraine and Georgia just lead to invasion of those countries. Existing NATO members have little appetite to get involved there. Having seen what happened to Ukraine and Georgia, I'm not sure that it would be sensible to roll the dice with Finland. | | | | | "NATO has over expanded, the credibility of Art.5 mutual defence is already stretched."
I would be interested to know why you believe "the credibility is already stretched"? Surely the more members there are then the more forces are available to join in the mutual defence.
As Russia has demonstrated they no longer have the capability to make a strong ground attack on multiple countries.
China might be a different case with a very large army with modern equipment but not really well positioned geographically to ground attack Europe.
| 
12.04.2022, 21:08
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Kt.Zh
Posts: 12,460
Groaned at 490 Times in 405 Posts
Thanked 19,538 Times in 9,887 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine? | Quote: | |  | | | Viktor Orbán is still dreaming about a new nuclear power plant financed and built with Russian reactors. However, I think that power plant was one of the very first civilian casualties of the invasion of Ukraine. https://www.euractiv.com/section/ene...plant-project/ | | | | | No worries, he'll run to Xi.  Hu has become a portal for Russia and China. Orban is very versatile, he has a special sense for what's fashionable. He started off as a true liberal and democrat, schooled at Soros university, in a time when liberalism was cool. Then he started copy-paste-ing KGB's manual so no worries, his flexibility and acrobatics will keep him in power.
| The following 2 users would like to thank greenmount for this useful post: | | 
12.04.2022, 22:30
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: SZ
Posts: 4,346
Groaned at 434 Times in 312 Posts
Thanked 9,572 Times in 4,056 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?
Vladimir Kara-Murza, a long-standing Russian pro-democracy voice and close friend of the late Boris Nemtsov, was arrested in Moscow yesterday for opposition to the war. There is a great interview with him from the 2017 PBS documentary which is worth watching. He paints a clear picture of Putin's path from 1999 to 2017. https://youtu.be/yIibXQU_dgo
He chose to go back to Russia recently, a Nawalny move. He said he could not be credible in calling for Russians to stand up against the regime from safe UK.
| The following 3 users would like to thank komsomolez for this useful post: | | 
13.04.2022, 09:12
| Member | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: 4900 Langenthal
Posts: 222
Groaned at 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thanked 294 Times in 121 Posts
| | Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?
Hi all you effers
Just put on some fantastic music... and this came up... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-Y0SMitMpk
What with all these civilian graves being found, i thought it might fit!
with that, enjoy Easter y'all
Greg
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 11 (0 members and 11 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:59. | |