Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #7001  
Old 15.06.2022, 13:09
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
Pope's also got a take on this:


https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/n...cattolica.html


Maybe he, too, reads Zerohedge in the morning?
;-)


Next thing, they'll disable his Twitter account and cancel him.
they ...
Reply With Quote
  #7002  
Old 15.06.2022, 13:30
Axa's Avatar
Axa Axa is online now
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Suhr, Aargau
Posts: 5,532
Groaned at 104 Times in 95 Posts
Thanked 8,125 Times in 3,806 Posts
Axa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
i guess it is largely true. things like heating oil and driving are often essential. at the margins you can cut back here and there, but people need to stay warm. they need to get to work. maybe if it gets really bad, people will try to substitute (train, bike) but it might not be practical for many people.
Switzerland has a magnificent public transport network. If someone lives in a place badly or not served by public transport, it's probably because this person chose to live in a single house with a garden, far from "noisy" apartment blocks. Also, it's ironic to live in the more expensive aspirational accommodation and not have enough money left to pay for gas.

Of course, this critique is not aimed at farmers and all other people whose job it out of cities. This is aimed at all workers whose job is on the city but do not like to live in the city. But as you mention are not wealthy enough to survive crisis times.
Reply With Quote
This user groans at Axa for this post:
  #7003  
Old 15.06.2022, 13:48
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vaud
Posts: 1,208
Groaned at 168 Times in 80 Posts
Thanked 701 Times in 362 Posts
markalex has an excellent reputationmarkalex has an excellent reputationmarkalex has an excellent reputationmarkalex has an excellent reputation
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Everybody knows that if anyone starts using nuclear weapons it's game over for the human race. Both Russia and NATO have enough nuclear weapons to toast each other several times over.

Nobody is going to give the UKRAINE nuclear weapons, luckily they gave Russia's nukes back after the Soviet Empire collapsed.

Right now there is a [I would say pro-China] documentary on nuclear weapons tests that the US did in the Marshall Islands on netflix. It is beyond belief what the US did at the time, but a treasure trove of data as to what would happen if Russia/NATO started firing nuclear missiles. at each other. It isn't true that nobody would win, because the planet would win, it would rid itself of the human race.

That said I starting to feel like this is a PROXY war between Western Europe and Russia. A testing ground for weapons of war. I can understand the initial reluctance to give the Ukraine forces much in the way of weapons for fear they would be quickly overrun, but three months into the battle I cannot help but wonder why NATO doesn't step in here with a little more heavy duty equipment. There was a story i the news about a NATO player giving the Ukraine three big guns of some sort, and number that sounds like a pilot project to test them, scary. I did read an article too suggesting America is keen to simply watch the Russians bleed to death on this, I hope they were wrong.

Do the powers that be really think China will stand behind Russia; I don't think so. India I am less sure, although I think they know in their hearts that they most certainly wouldn't be better off in bed with the Russians. Would North Korea join the Russians, sure if they thought it would upset the Americans. A handful of countries in the middle East might see this as an opportunity to, but are they a force to worry about, not so much I think.

A realistic worse case scenario will be China invades Taiwan thinking the US is looking the other way and the ARAB states attack Isreal [again] also convinced the US has it hands full with Russia. At that point we would be facing a third world war.
Reply With Quote
  #7004  
Old 15.06.2022, 14:27
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kt.Zh
Posts: 12,128
Groaned at 485 Times in 400 Posts
Thanked 19,002 Times in 9,614 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
Nobody is going to give the UKRAINE nuclear weapons, luckily they gave Russia's nukes back after the Soviet Empire collapsed.
We probably wouldn't have this war now, had they kept the nuclear weapons....just a thought. Russia doesn't look more mature than Ukraine, if this is what you mean.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank greenmount for this useful post:
  #7005  
Old 15.06.2022, 14:59
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 4,159
Groaned at 80 Times in 59 Posts
Thanked 4,435 Times in 2,390 Posts
rainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
Everybody knows that if anyone starts using nuclear weapons it's game over for the human race. Both Russia and NATO have enough nuclear weapons to toast each other several times over.

Nobody is going to give the UKRAINE nuclear weapons, luckily they gave Russia's nukes back after the Soviet Empire collapsed.

Right now there is a [I would say pro-China] documentary on nuclear weapons tests that the US did in the Marshall Islands on netflix. It is beyond belief what the US did at the time, but a treasure trove of data as to what would happen if Russia/NATO started firing nuclear missiles. at each other. It isn't true that nobody would win, because the planet would win, it would rid itself of the human race.

That said I starting to feel like this is a PROXY war between Western Europe and Russia. A testing ground for weapons of war. I can understand the initial reluctance to give the Ukraine forces much in the way of weapons for fear they would be quickly overrun, but three months into the battle I cannot help but wonder why NATO doesn't step in here with a little more heavy duty equipment. There was a story i the news about a NATO player giving the Ukraine three big guns of some sort, and number that sounds like a pilot project to test them, scary. I did read an article too suggesting America is keen to simply watch the Russians bleed to death on this, I hope they were wrong.

Do the powers that be really think China will stand behind Russia; I don't think so. India I am less sure, although I think they know in their hearts that they most certainly wouldn't be better off in bed with the Russians. Would North Korea join the Russians, sure if they thought it would upset the Americans. A handful of countries in the middle East might see this as an opportunity to, but are they a force to worry about, not so much I think.

A realistic worse case scenario will be China invades Taiwan thinking the US is looking the other way and the ARAB states attack Isreal [again] also convinced the US has it hands full with Russia. At that point we would be facing a third world war.

I think people should not confuse nuclear weapons with ICBMs.

Yields are small enough these days that you can "safely" fire a nuclear shell and take down a large city without making half the country uninhabitable.
It's not nice. In fact, it's going to be pretty dirty and there will be lots of causalities and long-term consequences for those in the vicinity of ground zero.
But it won't be the end of the world (provided the other side keeps its cool...).

It will be the end of the world as we know it - but both sides know exactly how to "play" this with minimal collateral damage.
So, don't count on it not happening just because you believe it will "end us" all.
That would be a terrible mistake to make.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank rainer_d for this useful post:
  #7006  
Old 15.06.2022, 15:41
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vaud
Posts: 1,208
Groaned at 168 Times in 80 Posts
Thanked 701 Times in 362 Posts
markalex has an excellent reputationmarkalex has an excellent reputationmarkalex has an excellent reputationmarkalex has an excellent reputation
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
I think people should not confuse nuclear weapons with ICBMs.

Yields are small enough these days that you can "safely" fire a nuclear shell and take down a large city without making half the country uninhabitable.
It's not nice. In fact, it's going to be pretty dirty and there will be lots of causalities and long-term consequences for those in the vicinity of ground zero.
But it won't be the end of the world (provided the other side keeps its cool...).

It will be the end of the world as we know it - but both sides know exactly how to "play" this with minimal collateral damage.
So, don't count on it not happening just because you believe it will "end us" all.
That would be a terrible mistake to make.
If Russia started to use Nuclear warheads than I think NATO would have little choice but to get involved, WW3.
Reply With Quote
  #7007  
Old 15.06.2022, 15:49
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
We probably wouldn't have this war now, had they kept the nuclear weapons....just a thought. Russia doesn't look more mature than Ukraine, if this is what you mean.
Good chance that we would have had this war in the mid 90s. With all the madness going on in Ukraine at that time, Russia could have framed this as a "need to secure WMD from a failed state" operation - a bit like Iraq 2003. And possibly no one would have objected in the first place.

One can have interesting philosophical discussions what nuclear weapons actually deter. Other than the use of nuclear weapons.
Reply With Quote
  #7008  
Old 15.06.2022, 16:26
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 4,159
Groaned at 80 Times in 59 Posts
Thanked 4,435 Times in 2,390 Posts
rainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
If Russia started to use Nuclear warheads than I think NATO would have little choice but to get involved, WW3.

How do you define "getting involved" anyway?


The 50-ish billion that congress has pledged for this year alone (mostly in the form of weapons-deliveries) isn't "involved" enough yet? That a lot of target-selection apparently is handled by US intelligence and US forces on the ground?


And besides, like in the case of MH17, just because a nuke exploded doesn't mean it was Russia. Or the US/Ukraine, for that matter.


You can trace and fingerprint the isotopes, of course, but that only proves where the Pu came from. Enough fissile material went missing over the last couple of decades on both sides of the iron curtain that will make final attribution much more difficult.


In the end, it doesn't matter, of course, just like few things will matter once somebody has hit that button ("inadvertently" or not).
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank rainer_d for this useful post:
  #7009  
Old 15.06.2022, 16:29
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post

And besides, like in the case of MH17, just because a nuke exploded doesn't mean it was Russia. Or the US/Ukraine, for that matter.


You can trace and fingerprint the isotopes, of course, but that only proves where the Pu came from. Enough fissile material went missing over the last couple of decades on both sides of the iron curtain that will make final attribution much more difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #7010  
Old 15.06.2022, 16:43
TinyK's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Left bank of Lake Zurich
Posts: 1,444
Groaned at 66 Times in 46 Posts
Thanked 1,577 Times in 797 Posts
TinyK has a reputation beyond reputeTinyK has a reputation beyond reputeTinyK has a reputation beyond reputeTinyK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
Good chance that we would have had this war in the mid 90s. With all the madness going on in Ukraine at that time,
What madness was going on in Ukraine in the mid 90s?
Reply With Quote
  #7011  
Old 15.06.2022, 16:56
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 12,363
Groaned at 718 Times in 602 Posts
Thanked 24,036 Times in 12,587 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
How do you define "getting involved" anyway?


The 50-ish billion that congress has pledged for this year alone (mostly in the form of weapons-deliveries) isn't "involved" enough yet? That a lot of target-selection apparently is handled by US intelligence and US forces on the ground?


And besides, like in the case of MH17, just because a nuke exploded doesn't mean it was Russia. Or the US/Ukraine, for that matter.


You can trace and fingerprint the isotopes, of course, but that only proves where the Pu came from. Enough fissile material went missing over the last couple of decades on both sides of the iron curtain that will make final attribution much more difficult.


In the end, it doesn't matter, of course, just like few things will matter once somebody has hit that button ("inadvertently" or not).
There are very few states capable of turning fissile material into a nuclear weapon and those would use their own fissile material rather than taking the risk of something going terribly wrong by using imported fissile material of unknown quality.

Postdetonation nuclear forensics is a very well researched topic and one would need to have more than some borrowed fissile material to fool the result.

All the nuclear states have a very good understanding of the principle of proportionality in defense after a nuclear incident so the situation is unlikely to escalate as quickly as some people fear.

What is the link between MH17 and a nuclear incident?
Reply With Quote
  #7012  
Old 15.06.2022, 16:58
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
What madness was going on in Ukraine in the mid 90s?
OK, madness is maybe the wrong word. But there was an economy in freefall, political instability, blatant corruption, oligarch power struggles and of course a lot of inherited issues with Russia from Black Sea fleet over gas transit and status of Crimea. Some described Ukraine as a borderline failed state.

I am not trying to dis Ukraine, I am just arguing that it is very possible that in this instability the Russians could have gone in with a "peacekeeping mission" that would have aimed to take their nukes away. Among other things.

Speculation, of course. I just don't buy the "had they only kept the nukes" argument.
Reply With Quote
  #7013  
Old 15.06.2022, 16:58
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post

What is the link between MH17 and a nuclear incident?
"Wasn't us"
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank komsomolez for this useful post:
  #7014  
Old 15.06.2022, 17:07
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 4,159
Groaned at 80 Times in 59 Posts
Thanked 4,435 Times in 2,390 Posts
rainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond reputerainer_d has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
There are very few states capable of turning fissile material into a nuclear weapon and those would use their own fissile material rather than taking the risk of something going terribly wrong by using imported fissile material of unknown quality.

Postdetonation nuclear forensics is a very well researched topic and one would need to have more than some borrowed fissile material to fool the result.

All the nuclear states have a very good understanding of the principle of proportionality in defense after a nuclear incident so the situation is unlikely to escalate as quickly as some people fear.

What is the link between MH17 and a nuclear incident?



It's the attribution. MH17 was likely shot down by a Russian missile, fired from the Donbas region somewhere (IIRC). But the situation at the front was murky enough that both sides could point to the other side...

And as I said, once a nuke has exploded, it's likely it doesn't matter anymore who pushed the button.

Remember 9/11?

Nobody said "Wait a minute, can we look at this more closely before we launch the cruise missiles?".
That's just not going to happen this time around, either.
Reply With Quote
  #7015  
Old 15.06.2022, 17:08
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kt.Zh
Posts: 12,128
Groaned at 485 Times in 400 Posts
Thanked 19,002 Times in 9,614 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
OK, madness is maybe the wrong word. But there was an economy in freefall, political instability, blatant corruption, oligarch power struggles and of course a lot of inherited issues with Russia from Black Sea fleet over gas transit and status of Crimea. Some described Ukraine as a borderline failed state.

I am not trying to dis Ukraine, I am just arguing that it is very possible that in this instability the Russians could have gone in with a "peacekeeping mission" that would have aimed to take their nukes away. Among other things.

Speculation, of course. I just don't buy the "had they only kept the nukes" argument.
Yeah, but Russia was also very weak back then, with the same problems. The clash of oligarchs and other party members to get their hands on as many state actives as they could. Remember Vladimir was popular because promised Russians to get rid of this stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #7016  
Old 15.06.2022, 17:11
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
Yeah, but Russia was also very weak back then, with the same problem. Remember Vladimir promised them to get rid of this stuff.
This wasn't my point.
Reply With Quote
  #7017  
Old 15.06.2022, 17:12
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kt.Zh
Posts: 12,128
Groaned at 485 Times in 400 Posts
Thanked 19,002 Times in 9,614 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
This wasn't my point.
OK, my point was they were less preoccupied by Ukraine. Am I wrong?

I personally believe they didn't expect Ukraine to want their independence so badly. They expected Ukraine to need a benevolent father who would tell them what to do.
Reply With Quote
  #7018  
Old 15.06.2022, 17:14
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 4,078
Groaned at 399 Times in 285 Posts
Thanked 8,752 Times in 3,740 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
OK, my point was they were less preoccupied by Ukraine. Am I wrong?
I don't know. It is speculative. Would Russia have been more preoccupued with a Ukraine with nukes? Maybe. Maybe not.
Reply With Quote
  #7019  
Old 15.06.2022, 17:47
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SG
Posts: 10,633
Groaned at 657 Times in 477 Posts
Thanked 14,440 Times in 7,550 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
So, letting Russians invest in Western Europe (media, sports teams, banks, famous natural gas pipelines), use Switzerland as safe box, take hold of Cyprus....all that is completely ignoring Russia?

I guess Nord Stream 1 and 2 are just another display of how Russian interests were ignored in the last 20-30 years
Trade isn't security. That aside, Ukraine's gas thefts and attempts at blackmailing a decade ago validated NS after the fact, and was probably a big driver behind NS2.

At the end of the day the invasion shows that the situation was no longer acceptable for Russia, that war and conquest are better from their POV than peace. That's the bitter reality. The reasons behind that POV will need to be considered in whatever kind of talks that are to come, whenever that will be. The earlier those talks start the less bloodshed and destruction is yet to come.

The really sad thing is that most of this may have been preventable. Now Russia creates the facts by force.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Urs Max for this useful post:
  #7020  
Old 15.06.2022, 19:09
TinyK's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Left bank of Lake Zurich
Posts: 1,444
Groaned at 66 Times in 46 Posts
Thanked 1,577 Times in 797 Posts
TinyK has a reputation beyond reputeTinyK has a reputation beyond reputeTinyK has a reputation beyond reputeTinyK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: World War 3 or just a local spat in Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
OK, madness is maybe the wrong word. But there was an economy in freefall, political instability, blatant corruption, oligarch power struggles and of course a lot of inherited issues with Russia from Black Sea fleet over gas transit and status of Crimea. Some described Ukraine as a borderline failed state.
Was Russia better at those times?
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank TinyK for this useful post:
This user groans at TinyK for this post:
Reply

Tags
crimea, russia, ukraine




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 10 (2 members and 8 guests)
gaburko, Excad
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jewish Refugees in Switzerland during World War II zanskar International affairs/politics 48 16.06.2010 15:58
Book about Switzerland in the second world war [recommendation?] telandy Other/general 14 18.06.2007 20:15


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0