Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2841  
Old 07.08.2018, 15:56
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CH
Posts: 10,229
Groaned at 339 Times in 277 Posts
Thanked 14,893 Times in 7,664 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
How can people claim not to be bigots, when clearly they post ad-infinitum in refuelling a thread about Islam with any and every statistic or news report that paints a terrible picture of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants and even pushing those boundaries by bringing in Black American society. What next Aboriginals in Australia? Native Americans?

It you want a debate about immigration, which does need a sensible debate, it would better done by people with more smarts then some of the posters here. It needs to carried out without prejudice and with intelligent discourse.
I'm tired of statistics of this sort but to be fair, for instance the argument that economic migrants should not be treated like war refugees or asylum seekers has never made an impact here. For you and marton is not even a subject of debate.
Agree it has nothing to do with the thread's title, but since, for unknown reasons, no mod is going to change it .... this thread is going to bother you ad-infinitum if you don't stop giving it so much attention. Apparently, it will not get closed either....any time soon. I rarely check the British referendum or Brexit threads anymore. I know that even those defending EU are doing it for the wrong reasons. (at least IMO)

Oh, and re. "Afro-American society"....for me it's the best example on how identity politics does not function. Not every idea that seems progressive is intelligent or will solve some of the society's historical discrepancies. Very OT here, I agree.

Last edited by greenmount; 07.08.2018 at 16:17.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank greenmount for this useful post:
  #2842  
Old 07.08.2018, 16:06
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
How far do you propose to take this? Foreigners create more crime, so we deport all foreigners and don't allow any in? Irish create more crime, etc etc.
No some foreigners create less crime than the incumbents - see image attachment - they are ideal candidates for resettlement.

Quote:
This is the whole crux though, isn't it. Treating people as individuals rather than as a homogenous group of <religion x>, <race y>, or <nationality z> - if as a law abiding, tax paying, positive contributing Irishman you got deported because a few of your countrymen kept getting eggy after a few too many bevvies, don't you think that is ridiculous and unfair?
No - I do not - unless those eggy Irishmen contributed more from their tax revenue than they cost from their egginess. My only potential problem would be where the stats didn't go far enough.

Coleman Hughes points this out very well recently

Quote:
Nor can historical racism explain wealth disparities between groups of the same race. A 2015 survey of wealth in Boston found that the median black household had only 8 dollars of wealth. Newsweek reported this fact under the heading “Racism in Boston.” But the 8 dollar figure only pertained to black Bostonians of American ancestry; black Bostonians of Caribbean ancestry had 12,000 dollars of wealth, despite having identical rates of college graduation, only slightly higher incomes, and being equally black in the same city.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CiS.JPG (66.1 KB, 51 views)

Last edited by parnell; 07.08.2018 at 16:08. Reason: attachment wouldnt show up directly
Reply With Quote
  #2843  
Old 07.08.2018, 16:34
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
No - I do not - unless those eggy Irishmen contributed more from their tax revenue than they cost from their egginess. My only potential problem would be where the stats didn't go far enough.
I think this is where we are always going to differ. Punishing the group for the sins of a few is best left in the realm of lazy primary school teachers in my book. It makes very little sense practically or economically compared to more exacting criteria.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #2844  
Old 07.08.2018, 16:42
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
I think this is where we are always going to differ. Punishing the group for the sins of a few is best left in the realm of lazy primary school teachers in my book. It makes very little sense practically or economically compared to more exacting criteria.
Differing is fine - in my opinion a rational group will always accept only those who contribute on a net basis at least as much as they do. Where the statistics allow greater definition than nationality , religion , gender etc. then even better.

However you say that you would apply even more exacting criteria. What would they be and how would you implement ?
Reply With Quote
  #2845  
Old 07.08.2018, 16:49
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
Differing is fine - in my opinion a rational group will always accept only those who contribute on a net basis at least as much as they do. Where the statistics allow greater definition than nationality , religion , gender etc. then even better.

However you say that you would apply even more exacting criteria. What would they be and how would you implement ?
If we discount refugees / asylum seekers, as I believe that we are morally (and probably legally, due to international agreements) obligated to allow them entry and safety then I think the criteria are relatively simple.

You can discriminate on things like ablility (utility to the country - level of education for example or how badly the country needs the person - nurses, doctors, etc). You can also discriminate against people with a criminal record (set a sensible threashold - motoring offences, fine, fraud or assault+ not fine).

You can't (and shouldn't morally or practically/economically speaking) discriminate on things like race/religion/nationality. Do you want to ban an Iranian rocket scientist or an Afghan Neurosurgeon? Almost certainly not.
Reply With Quote
  #2846  
Old 07.08.2018, 16:57
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Steinach SG
Posts: 8,455
Groaned at 411 Times in 310 Posts
Thanked 11,014 Times in 5,798 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
Can you provide any evidence for that ? Genuinely interested.
Quite frankly I doubt you really are. But just in case start with this and check the chart on UK's foreign prison population in relation to their share of the population.


Quote:
View Post
Again I'm not familiar with this "phenemenon" but keen to see evidence.
Oh my, that's just too bad. You should have paid attentiont when the stuff got posted.

The info is still avaliable, feel free to search the relevant threads. Those on the MEI and the Durchsetzungsinitiative come to mind.
Quote:
View Post
If anything I had expected the Irish to be over-represented due to the amount of anti-British sentiment many of them bear as well as the large number of ethnically Irish travellers who have been extremely difficult to manage in both countries.
I really doubt the Swiss in the UK generally have an historical axe to grind with the British. Yet they're over-represented in the prisons just like everybody else.

Last edited by Urs Max; 07.08.2018 at 17:08.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Urs Max for this useful post:
  #2847  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:06
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Hope he doesn’t apologise.

Boris Johnson told to apologise for burka jibe
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #2848  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:14
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
Quite frankly I doubt you really are. But just in case start with this and check the chart on UK's foreign prison population in relation to their share of the population.


That's an interesting chart but is not what you state above i.e. "chart on UK's foreign prison population in relation to their share of the population."

It shows the proportion of foreigners in prison in each country relative to the proportion of foreigners in that country itself. If anything it suggests that the best policy adopted to immigration is that of Japan - at least from the perspective of the penal system.

Quote:
View Post
Oh my, that's just too bad. You should have paid attentiont when the stuff got posted.

The info is still avaliable, feel free to search the relevant threads. Those on the MEI and the Durchsetzungsinitiative come to mind.

I really doubt the Swiss in the UK generally have an historical axe to grind with the British. Yet they're over-represented in the prisons just like everybody else.
No they are not - as per above. Please pay closer attention to the data.
Reply With Quote
  #2849  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:22
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
If we discount refugees / asylum seekers, as I believe that we are morally (and probably legally, due to international agreements) obligated to allow them entry and safety then I think the criteria are relatively simple.
How do you distinguish between economic refugees or benefit tourists and genuine refugees in an economically effective way ? Also Japan for example is extremely rigorous in its vetting of asylum seekers yet no country has yet to lay sanctions against them as a result.

Quote:
You can discriminate on things like ablility (utility to the country - level of education for example or how badly the country needs the person - nurses, doctors, etc). You can also discriminate against people with a criminal record (set a sensible threashold - motoring offences, fine, fraud or assault+ not fine).
Agree with you on all counts there - but again you need to define "utility" in a clear and objective way - which in itself is quite difficult unless you revert to "net economic contribution"
Quote:
You can't (and shouldn't morally or practically/economically speaking) discriminate on things like race/religion/nationality. Do you want to ban an Iranian rocket scientist or an Afghan Neurosurgeon? Almost certainly not.
I disagree with you on this - religion and nationality in particular have proven to be highly correlated to culture - which as Hughes and Sowell before him is tremendously correlated to economic outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #2850  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:25
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
Yeah, cos petty cheap name calling is the new politics isn't it?

All about deflection and who can be the biggest man-child when you are utterly devoid of talent, knowledge and balls. FFS, they need to grow up.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #2851  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:29
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
How do you distinguish between economic refugees or benefit tourists and genuine refugees in an economically effective way ? Also Japan (for example is extremely rigorous in its vetting of asylum seekers yet no country has yet to lay sanctions against them as a result.
I think the guidelines on what constitutes a valid asylum claim are pretty well entrenched in most western countries. The UN definition is set out here:
https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/po...s_about_asylum

Quote:
View Post
Agree with you on all counts there - but again you need to define "utility" in a clear and objective way - which in itself is quite difficult unless you revert to "net economic contribution".
More difficult to define, it shouldn't only be based on salary of course - nurses may earn less than average but are essential. It is quite easy to define..."If you fall outside our sought after professions list, you need proof you can support yourself (+spouse and kids where applicable) - this amounts to xx,xxx per year plus xx,xxx for a spouse and xx,xxx per child. Failing this, you need to show you have a minimum of xxx,xxx of liquid assets."

Quote:
View Post
I disagree with you on this - religion and nationality in particular have proven to be highly correlated to culture - which as Hughes and Sowell before him is tremendously correlated to economic outcome.
The economic outcome is already known, they are highly trained professionals. I doubt you'd argue that race or religion is more highly correlated to outcome than the occupation (i.e. income & wealth) of the parents for when they have kids.
Reply With Quote
  #2852  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:36
JoeUK's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Au
Posts: 638
Groaned at 30 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 828 Times in 448 Posts
JoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputation
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

It would be so nice to drag this back to the original topic... Always being derailed by the same few, in particular the one who once posted on this very forum about their 'former' IRA sympathies -- until they grew up --.
Reply With Quote
  #2853  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:37
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
I think the guidelines on what constitutes a valid asylum claim are pretty well entrenched in most western countries. The UN definition is set out here:
https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/po...s_about_asylum
That is not the question asked - try again (please).

Quote:
More difficult to define, it shouldn't only be based on salary of course - nurses may earn less than average but are essential. It is quite easy to define..."If you fall outside our sought after professions list, you need proof you can support yourself (+spouse and kids where applicable) - this amounts to xx,xxx per year plus xx,xxx for a spouse and xx,xxx per child. Failing this, you need to show you have a minimum of xxx,xxx of liquid assets."
I think this is pretty good.

Quote:
The economic outcome is already known, they are highly trained professionals. I doubt you'd argue that race or religion is more highly correlated to outcome than the occupation (i.e. income & wealth) of the parents for when they have kids.
With your first statement I would say it is not certain and therefore not known e.g. do they speak the language ? Are they Salafists ?

To your second statement I would tend to agree but have no problem with using additional attributes to inform the decision.
Reply With Quote
  #2854  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:48
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
That is not the question asked - try again (please).
With the greatest respect, I believe it is the answer the the question you asked...

Quote:
View Post
How do you distinguish between economic refugees or benefit tourists and genuine refugees in an economically effective way?.
As mentioned above, in the link I sent, is the definition of a valid claim for asylum. This establishes the process by which asylum seekers are accepted as genuine refugees.

My suggestion regarding who can move to the country outside of asylum seekers, which you agreed with largely, eliminates benefits tourism. I think the term "economic refugee" isn't really a good one, it doesn't make sense. Refugee implies a threat to self, it has no economic component. Economic migrant is perhaps more apposite. They would only be admitted if they met my criteria from the previous post.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #2855  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:51
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
It would be so nice to drag this back to the original topic... Always being derailed by the same few, in particular the one who once posted on this very forum about their 'former' IRA sympathies -- until they grew up --.
We are discussing reasonable criteria for immigration - including for Muslims. How is that a derailment ?

Thanks a lot for the personal attack - I especially like the way you put the word "former" in inverted commas - as if the many posts condemning that organisation and those who support it were not evidence of my genuine loathing for them.

Those who wish to check the post to which Joe refers can find it here.

Finally I could ask if you have any intention of growing up.
Reply With Quote
  #2856  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:59
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
With the greatest respect, I believe it is the answer the the question you asked...



As mentioned above, in the link I sent, is the definition of a valid claim for asylum. This establishes the process by which asylum seekers are accepted as genuine refugees.
Firstly thank u for being respectful.

"How do you distinguish between economic refugees or benefit tourists and genuine refugees in an economically effective way? was the bit I was hoping you would establish.
To my mind to do that you have to be strict enough to deter any non-genuine applicants - e.g. anyone who has destroyed identification documents.

Quote:
My suggestion regarding who can move to the country outside of asylum seekers, which you agreed with largely, eliminates benefits tourism. I think the term "economic refugee" isn't really a good one, it doesn't make sense. Refugee implies a threat to self, it has no economic component. Economic migrant is perhaps more apposite. They would only be admitted if they met my criteria from the previous post.
I do not know if it eliminates benefit tourism - it would - if properly enforced establish "fitness to work".
Reply With Quote
  #2857  
Old 07.08.2018, 17:59
JoeUK's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Au
Posts: 638
Groaned at 30 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 828 Times in 448 Posts
JoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputation
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
We are discussing reasonable criteria for immigration - including for Muslims. How is that a derailment ?

Thanks a lot for the personal attack - I especially like the way you put the word "former" in inverted commas - as if the many posts condemning that organisation and those who support it were not evidence of my genuine loathing for them.

Those who wish to check the post to which Joe refers can find it here.

Finally I could ask if you have any intention of growing up.

My point is that I have a Scottish mate who is a massive Rangers fan and will blame anything and everything on 'Fenian Bastards'. He's still a mate but I heartily detest his view regarding this. What is the difference between him and you?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank JoeUK for this useful post:
  #2858  
Old 07.08.2018, 18:05
parnell's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geroldswil
Posts: 513
Groaned at 186 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 1,767 Times in 872 Posts
parnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond reputeparnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
My point is that I have a Scottish mate who is a massive Rangers fan and will blame anything and everything on 'Fenian Bastards'. He's still a mate but I heartily detest his view regarding this. What is the difference between him and you?
1. I don't like football
2. We are not mates (yet)
3. I don't blame "anything and everything on" any one section of society - not even Sinn Fein (although they are ku.n.ts) - for example the weather - oh ok mostly I blame the Chinese and the Yanks for that
4. Thanks for the distraction - I took it as banter and didn't take offence
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank parnell for this useful post:
  #2859  
Old 07.08.2018, 18:14
JoeUK's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Au
Posts: 638
Groaned at 30 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 828 Times in 448 Posts
JoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputationJoeUK has an excellent reputation
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

The thing is he hates all catholics for no reason as far as I can see, that they support Celtic. Known him for over 30 yeras always the same. He's been living in Thailand for years surrounded by Muslims. Buddhists and what not... Still hates catholics. Irrational, nicest bloke you coud ever meet unless... Now back to the topic.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank JoeUK for this useful post:
  #2860  
Old 07.08.2018, 18:42
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Steinach SG
Posts: 8,455
Groaned at 411 Times in 310 Posts
Thanked 11,014 Times in 5,798 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: All about Muslims (in the wake of terrorist attacks in Europe)

Quote:
View Post
That's an interesting chart but is not what you state above i.e. "chart on UK's foreign prison population in relation to their share of the population."

It shows the proportion of foreigners in prison in each country relative to the proportion of foreigners in that country itself. If anything it suggests that the best policy adopted to immigration is that of Japan - at least from the perspective of the penal system.
Correct, I misphrased.The chart confirms the statement you you replied to above, i.e. that the situation is the same everywhere: Foreigners are overrepresented in prisons.

So you agree on the fact. It's another one you should expect to not get additional evidence for. Regardless of the extent to which you keep being obtuse and obnoxious.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will borders with CH be affected after terrorist attacks? McTAVGE Daily life 19 15.11.2015 17:14
The All Muslims are evil thread bigblue2 General off-topic 4 27.08.2010 14:46
Confused about coverage in rest of Europe on Swiss Health Insurance Wingnut Insurance 8 15.12.2008 08:20


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0