Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
View Poll Results: What would you personally prefer to happen?
I want the UK to stay in an ever-closer union 49 23.11%
I want the UK to stay in a loosely connected EU 68 32.08%
I want the UK out because the EU is bad for the UK 22 10.38%
I want the UK out because the EU is a bad thing 23 10.85%
I want the UK out because this would be good for the rest of us 17 8.02%
I don't really care 33 15.57%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #24461  
Old 14.11.2019, 22:25
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 4,195
Groaned at 89 Times in 83 Posts
Thanked 8,848 Times in 4,051 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
I am losing the plot!


Source

Can that be true?
Somewhat hypocrical?

I watched this interview on Sky News with him this afternoon. https://news.sky.com/video/general-e...-jobs-11861396
Reply With Quote
  #24462  
Old 14.11.2019, 22:49
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 4,195
Groaned at 89 Times in 83 Posts
Thanked 8,848 Times in 4,051 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
China definitely isn't an ASEAN member (neither PRC nor ROC..)
Sorry. My mistake. Strategic partner.
Reply With Quote
  #24463  
Old 15.11.2019, 02:17
Jim2007's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kt. Bern
Posts: 4,401
Groaned at 118 Times in 101 Posts
Thanked 5,236 Times in 2,474 Posts
Jim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Will there be a European army? Maybe, all depends on the external pressures I guess - I can't see it being an offensive force, just a defensive measure brought about by Russia/China/American advances.
It always amusing how BREXITEERS seem to think that the same countries and armies will work if their are called NATO, but not if they are called something else....

The biggest impact that will come from EU coordination is the concentration of that spend in Europe as opposed to the US military complex and given that will be the second biggest budget in the world is a major part of the objection...
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Jim2007 for this useful post:
  #24464  
Old 15.11.2019, 09:00
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 7,324
Groaned at 258 Times in 194 Posts
Thanked 15,554 Times in 5,445 Posts
k_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
It always amusing how BREXITEERS seem to think that the same countries and armies will work if their are called NATO, but not if they are called something else....

The biggest impact that will come from EU coordination is the concentration of that spend in Europe as opposed to the US military complex and given that will be the second biggest budget in the world is a major part of the objection...

If you would harmonize budgets, standards, military service etc in the EU, then that could definitely work, but will need a lot of time. Especially when considering that the US spends 3 times more than EU countries.



Also, I don't think that someone like Putin will be impressed by a military alliance without the US.
Reply With Quote
  #24465  
Old 15.11.2019, 11:22
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,926
Groaned at 215 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 21,015 Times in 8,958 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post



Also, I don't think that someone like Putin will be impressed by a military alliance without the US.
Maybe not impressed, but not unhappy
Reply With Quote
  #24466  
Old 15.11.2019, 11:46
StirB's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,572
Groaned at 151 Times in 133 Posts
Thanked 6,442 Times in 2,761 Posts
StirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
If you would harmonize budgets, standards, military service etc in the EU, then that could definitely work, but will need a lot of time. Especially when considering that the US spends 3 times more than EU countries.



Also, I don't think that someone like Putin will be impressed by a military alliance without the US.
Surely the military alliance would still be NATO, but with a consolidated European force rather than piecemeal contributions from each member state?
Reply With Quote
  #24467  
Old 15.11.2019, 11:49
baboon's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rheintal
Posts: 3,879
Groaned at 126 Times in 112 Posts
Thanked 5,329 Times in 2,575 Posts
baboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
If you would harmonize budgets, standards, military service etc in the EU, then that could definitely work, but will need a lot of time. Especially when considering that the US spends 3 times more than EU countries.

Also, I don't think that someone like Putin will be impressed by a military alliance without the US.
Why would that be any different to NATO?

And why do you think Putin is working so aggressively to undermine the EU? EU military spending is something like 4 times Russia. And as Europe is not seeking world domination we don't need the level of military spending the US has.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank baboon for this useful post:
  #24468  
Old 15.11.2019, 11:51
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 7,324
Groaned at 258 Times in 194 Posts
Thanked 15,554 Times in 5,445 Posts
k_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Surely the military alliance would still be NATO, but with a consolidated European force rather than piecemeal contributions from each member state?

I agree. Question is just if US, Canada and Turkey will like that. Question is also if the 6 non-NATO EU members will like it.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank k_and_e for this useful post:
  #24469  
Old 15.11.2019, 11:54
StirB's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,572
Groaned at 151 Times in 133 Posts
Thanked 6,442 Times in 2,761 Posts
StirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond reputeStirB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
I agree. Question is just if US, Canada and Turkey will like that. Question is also if the 6 non-NATO EU members will like it.
I presume they would have the power to Veto an EU army, as Britain would also have had.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank StirB for this useful post:
  #24470  
Old 15.11.2019, 15:12
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Neuchatel
Posts: 23,047
Groaned at 553 Times in 424 Posts
Thanked 25,570 Times in 11,735 Posts
Odile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Good woman- great accent too- would be better without the beep though

https://www.indy100.com/article/bori...FIRWCDFwfJZrWM
Reply With Quote
  #24471  
Old 15.11.2019, 15:25
Ato Ato is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: ZH
Posts: 388
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 601 Times in 257 Posts
Ato has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Surely the military alliance would still be NATO, but with a consolidated European force rather than piecemeal contributions from each member state?
It needs to be different as some EU countries are not in NATO.
I think the understanding is that the EU force is for limited conflicts such as disaster relief peacekeeping whilst NATO is an alliance for war. Not sure if that's written in stone though.
Reply With Quote
  #24472  
Old 15.11.2019, 15:52
Jim2007's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kt. Bern
Posts: 4,401
Groaned at 118 Times in 101 Posts
Thanked 5,236 Times in 2,474 Posts
Jim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond reputeJim2007 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
It needs to be different as some EU countries are not in NATO.
I think the understanding is that the EU force is for limited conflicts such as disaster relief peacekeeping whilst NATO is an alliance for war. Not sure if that's written in stone though.
NATO is breathing it's last, the US and the UK just have not read the memo. Being obliged to render assistance to war mongers is not longer acceptable. That is why all recent support of EU states have been invoked under the EU mutual assistance treaties not NATO.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank Jim2007 for this useful post:
  #24473  
Old 15.11.2019, 16:06
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Zürich
Posts: 802
Groaned at 73 Times in 55 Posts
Thanked 984 Times in 493 Posts
YuropFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeYuropFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeYuropFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeYuropFlyer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
NATO is breathing it's last, the US and the UK just have not read the memo. Being obliged to render assistance to war mongers is not longer acceptable. That is why all recent support of EU states have been invoked under the EU mutual assistance treaties not NATO.
Pretty much that. NATO support is terribly low. You can't just stick dictatorships like Turkey who go on offensive landgrabs or countries run by maniacs like Trump into the same military alliance with peaceful nations. NATO was there due to the need to "protect the western hemisphere from communism" (well, rather widely said) - the Russians nowadays, while having still a reasonable large force, aren't the risk to Europe that some still try to portray them at being. Their success against Ukraine was mostly if not solely working only because a clear majority of local people in those areas didn't feel as Ukrainians, but as Russians (and by extremely alienating Ukrainian politics regarding their Russian minorities in the East & on the Krim)

The Russians can't steamroll into Latvia, Estonia, Finland or anything like that - NATO or not. In fact, placing NATO troops right at the Russian border probably heated up the conflict, nothing else. Instead of working together to remove the world wide nuclear threat, NATO aggression has "worked" on exactly the opposite. By crazy Trumps' refusal to honour the Iran treaty, Europe got into a position where they can't do anything without either making the annoying toddler in Washington D.C. going all nuts, or supplying the Iranians with massive support from their own people. Because, that time, it's clear the "west" (ie, NATO..) did the treason, while Iran did everything that was in the deal. Break the deal, face the consequences. Can't push Iranians into supporting their own gouvernment more than that.

Cancelling NATO (US+UK+Canada+Turkey can found their own best buddy alliance..) and having a strong yet defensive European military force will enable current NON-NATO members to join it, and it being clearly of defensive nature will save tons of money. No need to buy all those offensive weapons the US/Turkey love to use to bomb and invade foreign countries at will.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank YuropFlyer for this useful post:
  #24474  
Old 15.11.2019, 16:23
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,926
Groaned at 215 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 21,015 Times in 8,958 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Pretty much that. NATO support is terribly low. You can't just stick dictatorships like Turkey who go on offensive landgrabs
NATO's inability to do anything about Turkey reflects a weakness of leadership within NATO. It shouldn't be necessary to argue that being in NATO comes with certain responsibilities and these include not invading neighbouring countries. NATO countries need to tell Turkey, either you play by the rules that we jointly signed up to, or we sanction you and maybe even expel you from NATO. Their silence on the matter is pretty disqualifying IMHO.

Quote:
View Post
the Russians nowadays, while having still a reasonable large force, aren't the risk to Europe that some still try to portray them at being. Their success against Ukraine was mostly if not solely working only because a clear majority of local people in those areas didn't feel as Ukrainians, but as Russians (and by extremely alienating Ukrainian politics regarding their Russian minorities in the East & on the Krim)
Such is the nature of Europe, with a long history of land grabs and borders being moved to and fro for questionable reasons that there is hardly a country that doesn't have a minority from neighbouring countries. Of course with people moving around more freely these days, the injustice does not even have to be historical. A cynical exploitation of the injustice does not somehow justify an invasion. Or does the large Irish population of say, Liverpool, justify Irish territorial claims on that city?

Quote:
View Post
The Russians can't steamroll into Latvia, Estonia, Finland or anything like that - NATO or not.
All of these countries have sizeable Russian minorities, and indeed Russian majorities in certain parts of those countries. What's the difference to the Ukraine?

Quote:
View Post
In fact, placing NATO troops right at the Russian border probably heated up the conflict, nothing else. Instead of working together to remove the world wide nuclear threat, NATO aggression has "worked" on exactly the opposite.
I agree. NATO has a leadership problem.


Quote:
View Post
By crazy Trumps' refusal to honour the Iran treaty, Europe got into a position where they can't do anything without either making the annoying toddler in Washington D.C. going all nuts, or supplying the Iranians with massive support from their own people. Because, that time, it's clear the "west" (ie, NATO..) did the treason, while Iran did everything that was in the deal. Break the deal, face the consequences. Can't push Iranians into supporting their own gouvernment more than that.
In my view, this whole epsiode has only underlined how the rest of the West just expects the USA to not only fix problems but to work out how to fix them and assume leadership on all levels. The moment the USA refuses to do that, the others are just a bunch of headless chickens and are unable to even form a coherent strategy.

Merkel, Marcron and co are shouting, "Look, Trump is a toddler. Who is going to change our diapers now?"

Quote:
View Post
Cancelling NATO (US+UK+Canada+Turkey can found their own best buddy alliance..) and having a strong yet defensive European military force will enable current NON-NATO members to join it, and it being clearly of defensive nature will save tons of money. No need to buy all those offensive weapons the US/Turkey love to use to bomb and invade foreign countries at will.
How can you cancel NATO?
Reply With Quote
  #24475  
Old 15.11.2019, 16:59
baboon's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rheintal
Posts: 3,879
Groaned at 126 Times in 112 Posts
Thanked 5,329 Times in 2,575 Posts
baboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond reputebaboon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
In my view, this whole epsiode has only underlined how the rest of the West just expects the USA to not only fix problems but to work out how to fix them and assume leadership on all levels. The moment the USA refuses to do that, the others are just a bunch of headless chickens and are unable to even form a coherent strategy.
Not really in this case. This episode has been created by the US who are using various forms of legal extra-territoriality to push everyone else to follow their dictat.

Europe are doing what they can to keep to the agreement but as the US sanctions companies for trading with Iran even though that trade is wholly outside the US by companies with no US ownership there are limits to how effective they can be.
Reply With Quote
  #24476  
Old 15.11.2019, 18:21
marton's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 10,695
Groaned at 356 Times in 307 Posts
Thanked 14,245 Times in 7,822 Posts
marton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond reputemarton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

@amogles
The parties to the Iran nuclear deal framework were the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council - the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, and China plus Germany and the European Union.

So it was not the US acting alone as a leader. Certainly, the US pulling out unilaterally without the agreement of the other parties and without any evidence that Iran was not doing their part created a huge problem.
It pushed Iran into increasing their nuclear development and left the other parties trying to maintain a fractured agreement.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank marton for this useful post:
  #24477  
Old 15.11.2019, 18:46
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CH
Posts: 8,333
Groaned at 267 Times in 217 Posts
Thanked 10,893 Times in 5,786 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
Why would that be any different to NATO?

And why do you think Putin is working so aggressively to undermine the EU? EU military spending is something like 4 times Russia. And as Europe is not seeking world domination we don't need the level of military spending the US has.
But then nobody will keep in check the Germans and you never know with those ones.

On a more serious note, I don't believe it's the time for an European army. Not yet. It wouldn't be quite good or efficient for us - the "decrepit European populations" (especially those from the Eastern part if I may add ) - as somebody here has put it. As our voices will probably not even count in the near future, might be useful to keep the yankees around.

Last edited by greenmount; 15.11.2019 at 18:57.
Reply With Quote
  #24478  
Old 15.11.2019, 21:44
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Zurich
Posts: 205
Groaned at 18 Times in 16 Posts
Thanked 290 Times in 163 Posts
John William has earned the respect of manyJohn William has earned the respect of manyJohn William has earned the respect of many
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Meanwhile here's the view from north of the border on the forthcoming General Election.

Name:  SNP Braveheart.jpg
Views: 117
Size:  66.9 KB
Reply With Quote
  #24479  
Old 16.11.2019, 09:32
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Zurich
Posts: 205
Groaned at 18 Times in 16 Posts
Thanked 290 Times in 163 Posts
John William has earned the respect of manyJohn William has earned the respect of manyJohn William has earned the respect of many
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Well here's the latest runners & riders of the British General Election - Wacky Races.

As you can see The Gruesome Twosome ( Boris & Rees-Mogg ) are in the lead, proving
that money really does grow on trees, while dogging their every path is Nigel ( Dick Dastardly )
Farage, ably assisted by The Brexit Party's mascot, Muttley.

Trying to overtake them is Corbyn & the Labour party faithful in their run down, open top Soviet
era Zil limousine; while in third place we have the Environmentally friendly tricycle, ridden
by Jo Swinson, for the LibDems as Penelope Pitstop.

Coming in at fourth 'hoots mon' we see Nicola Sturgeon closing in on the PM for the SNP from
Scotland and bringing up the rear, we have none other than The Orange Order automobile,
driven by Will power ( King William's ghost ? ) with Arlene Foster and senior members
of the DUP on board; representing Unionist interests in Northern Ireland.



Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank John William for this useful post:
  #24480  
Old 16.11.2019, 10:23
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CH
Posts: 8,333
Groaned at 267 Times in 217 Posts
Thanked 10,893 Times in 5,786 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in

Quote:
View Post
And with a fast changing world, indeed many jobs in the first world (which HKG is part of) have become redundant, due to automatisation and global trade. However, if you position yourself right, and got the skills, this new world does offer plenty of opportunities. Protesting against a changing world never has worked. It won't for America under Trump, and - to get back to topic - it won't bring back the UK it's "Empire" as the Brexshiters think it will.
"Brexshiters"? I have heard of Brexiters or Brexiteers lol, that's an "upgrade" on the insult scale. Wonder where is K and E to preach you some manners.
Although some of the Brexiteers actually do fit your term/description, but we're usually polite on EF... Farage being one of them, but who listens to that guy anymore? His role is done. What a brave soldier he was, covering himself all in that mud. For a good cause, of course...of course.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank greenmount for this useful post:
Reply

Tags
europe




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Latest Referendum, what will be consequences for EU (C permit and B permit) holders? expat2014 Permits/visas/government 3 11.02.2014 08:59
Importing vehicles and the VAT consequences in Switzerland from France BEFO Finance/banking/taxation 6 07.08.2013 15:11
The (Available in CH) Dog Food Review Thread meloncollie Pet corner 44 08.05.2012 20:15
Common-law marriage and consequences in CH Mishto Family matters/health 9 01.10.2011 22:03
Something for the Brits: M&S in CH mark Daily life 11 15.11.2007 12:18


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0