View Poll Results: What would you personally prefer to happen? |
I want the UK to stay in an ever-closer union
|    | 49 | 23.11% |
I want the UK to stay in a loosely connected EU
|    | 68 | 32.08% |
I want the UK out because the EU is bad for the UK
|    | 22 | 10.38% |
I want the UK out because the EU is a bad thing
|    | 23 | 10.85% |
I want the UK out because this would be good for the rest of us
|    | 17 | 8.02% |
I don't really care
|    | 33 | 15.57% |  | | | 
03.07.2016, 21:44
|  | RIP | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Eglisau
Posts: 7,248
Groaned at 46 Times in 45 Posts
Thanked 14,131 Times in 5,506 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: |  | | | Oh but it does, it is just 'different':
The British Constitution is derived from a number of sources. Statutes are laws passed by Parliament and are generally the highest form of law. Conventions are unwritten practices which have developed over time and regulate the business of governing. Common law is law developed by the courts and judges through cases. The UK’s accession to the European Communities Act 1972 has meant that European law is increasingly impacting on the British Constitution. The UK is also subject to international law. Finally, because the British Constitution cannot be found in any single document, politicians and lawyers have relied on constitutional authorities to locate and understand the constitution. | | | | |
I would substitute "debatable" with "different" and let the rest stand.
They will just "muddle on", perhaps one of the tensions between Britain and the EU is precisely this: the difference between codification and muddling on.
| This user would like to thank JagWaugh for this useful post: | | 
03.07.2016, 21:56
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 9,130
Groaned at 170 Times in 153 Posts
Thanked 25,643 Times in 6,892 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | Getting German citizenship is the issue here | | | | | No it isn't. You seem to understand neither the article nor my previous post.
Germany does not allow dual-citizenship except for EU and Swiss citizens. They are considering adding the UK (when it stops being part of the EU) to that list.
Or am I the one not understanding? It seems so clear ...
| 
03.07.2016, 22:07
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
Total klar Adrian.
| This user would like to thank for this useful post: | | 
03.07.2016, 22:21
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: At home
Posts: 4,166
Groaned at 208 Times in 133 Posts
Thanked 6,403 Times in 2,719 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | Or am I the one not understanding? | | | | | No it's me, sorry, because I was wrong about the UK: It is allowed to legally renounce citizenship in the UK, which I for some reason thought was not possible, like it used to be the case in France. I obviously mixed up with something else.
I was referring to the German rule that if there is no legal procedure for renouncement, dual citizenship is accepted de facto. But it doesn't apply to the UK, which I wrongly was convinced of. Sorry for the mix up.
| The following 4 users would like to thank Faltrad for this useful post: | | 
03.07.2016, 23:04
|  | RIP | | Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Murten - Morat
Posts: 11,865
Groaned at 563 Times in 354 Posts
Thanked 11,548 Times in 5,941 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | A few facts need to be considered,
.......... the proposed EU constitution was revoked by the French, and then the Dutch & Irish. The EU brought the new constitution into law, by calling it the Treaty of Lisbon.
Did the UK sign up for this? | | | | | Yes,
In the UK, the European Union (Amendment) Bill was debated in the House of Commons on 21 January 2008, and passed its second reading that day by a vote of 362 to 224; Prime Minister Gordon Brown was absent that day; the Bill was proposed to the Commons by David Miliband.
The Treaty of Lisbon entered into force on 1 December 2009. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Lisbon | This user would like to thank Sbrinz for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 00:05
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Kt. Bern
Posts: 6,090
Groaned at 385 Times in 282 Posts
Thanked 10,027 Times in 4,379 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: |  | | | Oh but it does, it is just 'different':
The British Constitution is derived from a number of sources. Statutes are laws passed by Parliament and are generally the highest form of law. Conventions are unwritten practices which have developed over time and regulate the business of governing. Common law is law developed by the courts and judges through cases. The UK’s accession to the European Communities Act 1972 has meant that European law is increasingly impacting on the British Constitution. The UK is also subject to international law. Finally, because the British Constitution cannot be found in any single document, politicians and lawyers have relied on constitutional authorities to locate and understand the constitution. | | | | | Reality is that there is not constitution and there is no constitutional court. The constitution is whatever the parliament or more accurately the Prime Minister says it is. Hence the idea of a sovereign parliament. The above explanation has been delivered countless times to passive citizens, but as we are now seeing it falls short of what is expected in a modern democracy.
| 
04.07.2016, 00:28
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Kt. Bern
Posts: 6,090
Groaned at 385 Times in 282 Posts
Thanked 10,027 Times in 4,379 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: |  | | | There is, after all, a tradition of EU member states repeating referendums on EU-related matters until voters eventually vote the “right” way. | | | | | Well this is simply not true, but a nice twist for those are anti-EU or lost a referendum!
In the case of Ireland, who have rejected two treaty amendments in the past, the government only negotiates as agent for the Irish people and not as a principle. This means that the EU cannot ignore an Irish referendum precisely because they are in negotiation with the Irish people and in negotiations there can be rejections, counter offers, assurances etc..., which are fully in line with the provisions of the Irish constitution.
In the case of the Lisbon treaty, the second offer included:
- The retention of Ireland's right to nominate a commissioner, independent of the other small states
- The restriction on the commission to legislate in the areas of taxation, abortion and military affairs.
These were the main concerns of the Irish voters and they were addressed. Hence the second proposal was accepted by 67% of the voters as opposed to 47% in the previous referendum.
In the coming two years we may be in for a series of referenda in Denmark, France and Ireland as 25 states and the peoples of 3 others seek to find common ground or the Commission may only offer EEA membership and WTO trading rules, to avoid such referenda...
__________________
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that is less than the one you are capable of living." - Nelson Mandela
| 
04.07.2016, 07:54
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Democratic Republic Kenistan
Posts: 10,650
Groaned at 279 Times in 230 Posts
Thanked 19,403 Times in 7,402 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
The UK has a constitution??
That's new. | 
04.07.2016, 08:10
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: At home
Posts: 4,166
Groaned at 208 Times in 133 Posts
Thanked 6,403 Times in 2,719 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | The UK has a constitution??
That's new.  | | | | | Just because it's not all published in one single book doesn't mean the UK doesn't have constitutional laws. It is simply derived from diverse sources like treaties, acts of parliaments, conventions, judgements etc. The only fundamental difference being that there is no instance higher than parliament, so no law can be unconstitutional by definition in the UK. But all the functions of a constitution are to be found in the legislative corpus of the country, its structure is just different, it's more like a kind of big Google Doc.
| The following 2 users would like to thank Faltrad for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 08:11
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 23,615
Groaned at 467 Times in 363 Posts
Thanked 18,940 Times in 10,453 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | The UK has a constitution??
That's new.  | | | | | No, it's not. It's simply an unwritten one, unlike most other countries, having developed over the centuries. Some parts are written such as the Magna Carta and the UK's Bill of Rights of 1689. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689
But there is no one document such as the US Constitution or the Swiss one.
| The following 3 users would like to thank Medea Fleecestealer for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 08:13
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Democratic Republic Kenistan
Posts: 10,650
Groaned at 279 Times in 230 Posts
Thanked 19,403 Times in 7,402 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | Just because it's not all published in one single book doesn't mean the UK doesn't have constitutional laws. It is simply derived from diverse sources like treaties, acts of parliaments, conventions, judgements etc. The only fundamental difference being that there is no instance higher than parliament, so no law can be unconstitutional by definition in the UK. But all the functions of a constitution are to be found in the legislative corpus of the country, its structure is just different, it's more like a kind of big Google Doc. | | | | | So not a constitution then in the way most countries view one. | The following 2 users would like to thank dodgyken for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 08:15
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: At home
Posts: 4,166
Groaned at 208 Times in 133 Posts
Thanked 6,403 Times in 2,719 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | So not a constitution then | | | | | If you restrict the definition of constitution to what you know about the US or Napoleon, then fine, but the rest of the world is not obliged to comply to this restriction.
| 
04.07.2016, 09:17
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | So not a constitution then in the way most countries view one.  | | | | | As was perfectly clear in my post.
| 
04.07.2016, 09:55
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
Jim 2007, your false quote is so out of order:
'Odile
There is, after all, a tradition of EU member states repeating referendums on EU-related matters until voters eventually vote the “right” way.,
Where and when did I write this, please?
| 
04.07.2016, 10:06
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Zurich
Posts: 14,254
Groaned at 1,470 Times in 967 Posts
Thanked 21,632 Times in 8,254 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: |  | | | Jim 2007, your false quote is so out of order:
'Odile
There is, after all, a tradition of EU member states repeating referendums on EU-related matters until voters eventually vote the “right” way.,
Where and when did I write this, please? | | | | | Erm... The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in CH | This user would like to thank Chuff for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 10:13
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
It was a quote- not my words though.
| 
04.07.2016, 10:19
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: canton ZH
Posts: 13,127
Groaned at 218 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 15,264 Times in 7,847 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | It's the last signs of life for the EU as we know it...One more LEAVE referendum in Netherlands or France and Bye Bye EU. In 5 years we'll be laughing for these undemocratic measures the EU is forcing upon sovereign states! | | | | | your word in Gods ear. Germany will not just back down "ah well, you don't want it, okay then ...." this thing will be a power struggle and I hope the guns won't come out. | Quote: | |  | | | Obviously you were 3 and a half when Yugoslavia broke apart, so you don't know much about it, don't you? | | | | | It doesn't matter how old or young he was ..... he's here now and he's got an opinion. Everytime someone runs out of arguments he/she tries a killer argument like yuo're too young/too old/stupid/a foreigner who should not have an opinion on other countries ..... that's not how democracy works. | Quote: | |  | | | Just because it's not all published in one single book doesn't mean the UK doesn't have constitutional laws. It is simply derived from diverse sources like treaties, acts of parliaments, conventions, judgements etc. The only fundamental difference being that there is no instance higher than parliament, so no law can be unconstitutional by definition in the UK. But all the functions of a constitution are to be found in the legislative corpus of the country, its structure is just different, it's more like a kind of big Google Doc. | | | | | So the actual parliament holds all the power? And the next one can change everything around again? No one to answer to? (genuine question). Kind of a group dictatorship?
| 
04.07.2016, 11:08
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Vaud
Posts: 1,466
Groaned at 115 Times in 75 Posts
Thanked 1,624 Times in 911 Posts
| | The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in CH | Quote: | |  | | | so the actual parliament holds all the power? And the next one can change everything around again? No one to answer to? (genuine question). Kind of a group dictatorship? | | | | | Where does this infallibility belief in a constitutional court comes from?
| This user would like to thank yacek for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 11:09
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Verbier
Posts: 21,365
Groaned at 461 Times in 352 Posts
Thanked 23,091 Times in 11,824 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
Osborne who was going to increase tax in an emergency budget, has now decided to cut corporation tax. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36699642 | This user would like to thank fatmanfilms for this useful post: | | 
04.07.2016, 11:31
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Once Vaud; then SG; now UK
Posts: 637
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanked 376 Times in 213 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
Bloomberg reports that Farage has quit being leader of UKIP! https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...pendence-party | The following 3 users would like to thank vuachère for this useful post: | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:54. | |