View Poll Results: What would you personally prefer to happen? |
I want the UK to stay in an ever-closer union
|    | 49 | 23.11% |
I want the UK to stay in a loosely connected EU
|    | 68 | 32.08% |
I want the UK out because the EU is bad for the UK
|    | 22 | 10.38% |
I want the UK out because the EU is a bad thing
|    | 23 | 10.85% |
I want the UK out because this would be good for the rest of us
|    | 17 | 8.02% |
I don't really care
|    | 33 | 15.57% |  | | | 
06.03.2017, 10:23
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Winterthur, ZH
Posts: 1,073
Groaned at 41 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 1,172 Times in 575 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | The best bit is, the UK has figured out that there's no legal obligation to pay a penny if no deal is reached. Which makes sense, why should you pay for something which you won't benefit from? This will be a high stakes game once negotiations start. | | | | | I don't think you understand what much of the money would be for. Much of the obligation involves commitments that will continue long after the UK leaves, such as their share of pension payments for former EU employees, including British ones.
Are you suggesting that the UK should renege on such commitments and if so, why would anyone bother making an agreement with them in the future? Regardless of the legality, it would be an excellent way to not only burn ones bridges with the EU, but pin ones flag to the mast of 'not to be trusted'.
| 
06.03.2017, 11:20
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Hamburg, Deutschland
Posts: 626
Groaned at 41 Times in 35 Posts
Thanked 786 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | I don't think you understand what much of the money would be for. Much of the obligation involves commitments that will continue long after the UK leaves, such as their share of pension payments for former EU employees, including British ones.
Are you suggesting that the UK should renege on such commitments and if so, why would anyone bother making an agreement with them in the future? Regardless of the legality, it would be an excellent way to not only burn ones bridges with the EU, but pin ones flag to the mast of 'not to be trusted'. | | | | | If it was me to decide, I would let the UK go without any deal and without any bill to pay.
I would also fire all British nationals working at any EU institution and stop paying the pensions for ex British EU employees.
Finally, they would be given 3 months to "make arrangements to leave the EU" or prove that they are affluent enough to stay and pay for their health insurance. If they have money we want them. | The following 2 users would like to thank lewton for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 11:31
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Winterthur, ZH
Posts: 1,073
Groaned at 41 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 1,172 Times in 575 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | If it was me to decide, I would let the UK go without any deal and without any bill to pay.
I would also fire all British nationals working at any EU institution and stop paying the pensions for ex British EU employees.
Finally, they would be given 3 months to "make arrangements to leave the EU" or prove that they are affluent enough to stay and pay for their health insurance. If they have money we want them.  | | | | | While what you suggest is over the top, if the UK refuses to honour previously agreed commitments, then the EU will most likely reciprocate and pull out of any ongoing projects prior to conclusion or terminate EU pension or insurance payments for British citizens. Either way it does not end well.
As an observation, I would note that the Brexiteers have been seeking to pursue any policy that would 'burn bridges' with the EU. I imagine it is down to a fear that in time public opinion will turn and they want to make returning to the EU impossible in the future.
| This user would like to thank Aeneas for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 11:43
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | I don't think you understand what much of the money would be for. Much of the obligation involves commitments that will continue long after the UK leaves, such as their share of pension payments for former EU employees, including British ones. | | | | |
I'd love to see the calculations that show how a few thousand gold plated Eurocrat pensions result in a bill for 60 billion euros. | Quote: | |  | | | Are you suggesting that the UK should renege on such commitments and if so, why would anyone bother making an agreement with them in the future? Regardless of the legality, it would be an excellent way to not only burn ones bridges with the EU, but pin ones flag to the mast of 'not to be trusted'. | | | | | Why should the UK pay for something that doesn't benefit them? These commitments were made when the UK was part of the EU.
| The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 12:19
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Winterthur, ZH
Posts: 1,073
Groaned at 41 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 1,172 Times in 575 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | I'd love to see the calculations that show how a few thousand gold plated Eurocrat pensions result in a bill for 60 billion euros. | | | | | I never said that the 60 billion Euro figure was simply pensions. I said that much of that figure is related to existing financial commitments of which pensions was simply an example. Please pay attention and try not to offer straw men. | Quote: |  | | | Why should the UK pay for something that doesn't benefit them? These commitments were made when the UK was part of the EU. | | | | | Why should anyone make a commitment and then stick to it when it no longer benefits them? Because of the only way to abandon that commitment is to break it, people will stop making commitments with them.
I've no doubt that the 60 billion Euro figure has been exaggerated by the EU, but to breaking every commitment that the UK made to the EU so as to 'stick it' to Brussels, isn't going to make other nations terribly enthusiastic about making trade deals that the UK could renege on tomorrow. Not really rocket science.
| This user would like to thank Aeneas for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 12:24
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Hamburg, Deutschland
Posts: 626
Groaned at 41 Times in 35 Posts
Thanked 786 Times in 448 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | As an observation, I would note that the Brexiteers have been seeking to pursue any policy that would 'burn bridges' with the EU. I imagine it is down to a fear that in time public opinion will turn and they want to make returning to the EU impossible in the future. | | | | | I have the same feeling and I totally support burning any bridges because I don't want England to ever return. Scotland is another story, if they manage to get independence I am 100% for admitting them to the EU.
| 
06.03.2017, 12:46
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,996
Groaned at 240 Times in 203 Posts
Thanked 23,081 Times in 9,806 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | I don't think you understand what much of the money would be for. Much of the obligation involves commitments that will continue long after the UK leaves, such as their share of pension payments for former EU employees, including British ones. | | | | | If I cancel my TCS or Greenpeace membership, am I still liable for the pensions of their management?
| This user would like to thank amogles for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 12:59
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Zürich
Posts: 1,263
Groaned at 183 Times in 131 Posts
Thanked 2,771 Times in 1,281 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | I'd love to see the calculations that show how a few thousand gold plated Eurocrat pensions result in a bill for 60 billion euros.
Why should the UK pay for something that doesn't benefit them? These commitments were made when the UK was part of the EU. | | | | | Because when you have made deals, you dont renage on your deal until such a time as a new deal can be struck or your commitments have been fulfilled. The UK will be still part of the EU for two years following our exit. The UK taxpayer pays for Trident it doesn't benfit anyone much, but it cost us 40 billion pounds for 10 years of supposed security. Yet we can't afford the NHS?
| 
06.03.2017, 13:09
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 9,845
Groaned at 434 Times in 375 Posts
Thanked 18,177 Times in 9,668 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | If I cancel my TCS or Greenpeace membership, am I still liable for the pensions of their management? | | | | | If you cancel your fixed term mortgage you have to pay interest to the original finish date.
| The following 2 users would like to thank marton for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 13:15
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Winterthur, ZH
Posts: 1,073
Groaned at 41 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 1,172 Times in 575 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | If I cancel my TCS or Greenpeace membership, am I still liable for the pensions of their management? | | | | | If I argue a strawman case that is completely different to what is being discussed, will I get away with it?
The answer is no. If the UK has not made commitments that go beyond its membership, then you'd be correct, but in some cases it has. For example, if a commitment has been made to fund a project, then it's irrelevant if it's going to benefit in the long term or not. It made a commitment - basically it promised it was going to pay. Legally it might be able to welsh out on that promise, but it still remains that it would have welsh ed out on a promise.
| 
06.03.2017, 13:20
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,996
Groaned at 240 Times in 203 Posts
Thanked 23,081 Times in 9,806 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | If I argue a strawman case that is completely different to what is being discussed, will I get away with it?
The answer is no. If the UK has not made commitments that go beyond its membership, then you'd be correct, but in some cases it has. For example, if a commitment has been made to fund a project, then it's irrelevant if it's going to benefit in the long term or not. It made a commitment - basically it promised it was going to pay. Legally it might be able to welsh out on that promise, but it still remains that it would have welsh ed out on a promise. | | | | | But then this should work both ways. The EU would still have to pay for projects in the UK that have been promised or commenced.
So far the remainer camp has been claiming all that will be gone immediately.
Somehow I think they're trying to interpret the rules very selectively.
| The following 2 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 13:22
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
The US has pulled out of TPP.
Countries have pulled out of supporting the ICC.
France left NATO and then rejoined.
In international politics there is no obligation to do anything.
Last edited by Loz1983; 06.03.2017 at 17:29.
Reason: typo
| The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 13:27
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,996
Groaned at 240 Times in 203 Posts
Thanked 23,081 Times in 9,806 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | If I argue a strawman case that is completely different to what is being discussed, will I get away with it?
The answer is no. If the UK has not made commitments that go beyond its membership, then you'd be correct, but in some cases it has. For example, if a commitment has been made to fund a project, then it's irrelevant if it's going to benefit in the long term or not. It made a commitment - basically it promised it was going to pay. Legally it might be able to welsh out on that promise, but it still remains that it would have welsh ed out on a promise. | | | | | I can join my local sports club. I can go to the AGM and vote to increase membership fees. I can vote for a new rule that all members have to invest a certain number of hours per week. I can then leave the club. None of that affects me. That's how clubs work.
| The following 2 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 13:39
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Verbier
Posts: 19,764
Groaned at 421 Times in 313 Posts
Thanked 19,845 Times in 10,626 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | If you cancel your fixed term mortgage you have to pay interest to the original finish date. | | | | | Well only true for little people in CH. If your a bigger organisation you organise a swop & pay or be paid any difference.
| This user would like to thank fatmanfilms for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 13:45
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Kt. Zürich
Posts: 9,845
Groaned at 434 Times in 375 Posts
Thanked 18,177 Times in 9,668 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | I can join my local sports club. I can go to the AGM and vote to increase membership fees. I can vote for a new rule that all members have to invest a certain number of hours per week. I can then leave the club. None of that affects me. That's how clubs work. | | | | | You could also vote that members have to pay cancellation fees when they leave | The following 2 users would like to thank marton for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 14:05
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Zurich
Posts: 10,996
Groaned at 240 Times in 203 Posts
Thanked 23,081 Times in 9,806 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | You could also vote that members have to pay cancellation fees when they leave  | | | | | But this is something different. You can't confuse commitment to ongoing projects and pensions with a cancellation fee, which if such a rule exists, is a well defined one-time sum enshrined in some piece of legislation.
Last edited by amogles; 06.03.2017 at 14:16.
| The following 2 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 14:44
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Winterthur, ZH
Posts: 1,073
Groaned at 41 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 1,172 Times in 575 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | But then this should work both ways. The EU would still have to pay for projects in the UK that have been promised or commenced. | | | | | Actually they would have to continue paying if they have undertaken to do so, within the parameters they agreed, although one would sympathize that they might also renege, in response to the UK reneging. | Quote: |  | | | So far the remainer camp has been claiming all that will be gone immediately. | | | | | Really. Was it the equivalent of a cross-party committee of peers or are you offering another straw man? Any eejitt can claim what they like, after all and as we can see. | Quote: |  | | | Somehow I think they're trying to interpret the rules very selectively. | | | | | They might be and the 60 billion figure could well be inflated. But there's a big difference between that and not "paying a penny". | Quote: | |  | | | In international politics there is no obligation to do anything. | | | | | Tell us, how has such a unilateral approach worked out in the past? | Quote: | |  | | | I can join my local sports club. I can go to the AGM and vote to increase membership fees. I can vote for a new rule that all members have to invest a certain number of hours per week. I can then leave the club. None of that affects me. That's how clubs work. | | | | | Of course if you undertake to pay a share of the cost for the new extension to the club house and having signed leave without paying that amount in full you'd still be liable and the club could sue you for the balance of monies owed. | Quote: | |  | | | But this is something different. You can't confuse commitment to ongoing projects and pensions with a cancellation fee, which if such a rule exists, is a well defined one-time sum enshrined in some piece of legislation. | | | | | How would any of the others not be well defined? Not understanding doesn't count.
| 
06.03.2017, 16:48
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 8,275
Groaned at 403 Times in 304 Posts
Thanked 10,787 Times in 5,680 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in | Quote: | |  | | | The US has left pulled out of TPP. | | | | | How many employees does a treaty have? What joint expenses were agreed upon by it's signatory countries? | Quote: | |  | | | Countries have pulled out of supporting the ICC. | | | | | Whatever ICC stands for (international communication conference?), see above. | Quote: | |  | | | France left NATO and then rejoined. | | | | | Wrong, France never left NATO. What they did leave and re-join was the joint military structure. | Quote: | |  | | | In international politics there is no obligation to do anything. | | | | | Wrong again, you're obliged to honor your treaties, that's why they were signed to begin with.
But it's a tad difficult to enforce them internationally as contrary to people, countries don't usually surrender their monopoly of force so trying to coerce a country may ultimately result in war. But before that happens there may be a trade war that is likely to cause significant damage to the economy, aka cost, and possibly more than honoring the contract would have cost.
Having a child as a married couple and divorcing is comparable to Brexit and its costs. By procreating you agree to do your share for years to come. You may of course divorce but that doesn't relieve you from the commitment and paying your part. Brexit costs is like paying expected alimony in one lump sum payment. | Quote: | |  | | | But this is something different. You can't confuse commitment to ongoing projects and pensions with a cancellation fee, which if such a rule exists, is a well defined one-time sum enshrined in some piece of legislation. | | | | | So is club membership. People are not countries.
Last edited by Urs Max; 06.03.2017 at 17:10.
| This user would like to thank Urs Max for this useful post: | | 
06.03.2017, 17:29
|  | Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Zugish
Posts: 564
Groaned at 18 Times in 10 Posts
Thanked 724 Times in 329 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
Looking at this list (below) of the house of lords I can see very little representation in line with the UK populous. 300 pounds per day to represent business, royal and political interests. 804 members and very few represent my thoughts.
I guess gongs for your mates feature strongly in the list. Along with the un-elected hereditary peers (who should immediately be removed)
I'm not quite sure how you can serve after a conviction for perjury either
Lord Archer of Weston-super-Mare Notable exceptions I'm sure there's a few more from the 804
Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes - ex Social Worker
Lord Judd - former Oxfam director https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member...House_of_Lords | 
06.03.2017, 18:20
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Zurich
Posts: 982
Groaned at 249 Times in 178 Posts
Thanked 2,158 Times in 997 Posts
| | Re: The Brexit referendum thread: potential consequences for GB, EU and the Brits in
I love how one guy thinks leaving the EU is like leaving a village sports club.
Ive got a mental picture of Merkel and Hollande banging a wooden gavel on a re-purposed school desk, asking for volunteers to bake some cakes for this weekends village fete, in a thick west country accent.
This thread is comedy gold!
| The following 2 users would like to thank J2488 for this useful post: | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:55. | |