Well an easy start is a website called Google. From there I see any headlines on the topic some similar to your claims, and different versions and spins. Clicking on a few, it seems the majority refer to an interview he did with the Wall Street Journal after his meeting with Obama. Sooooo, guess what's the next step, let's look at the actual Wall Street Journal to see what he actually said?!!!? Hint....its a bit different from some of the other headlines are sourcing it are saying.

Despite what Chemmie says, some of us have just been reading selected transcripts of the interview in American news channels. Both aspects he's looking into keeping, have their merit. This will be a case of how much you can lose without the original concept becoming obsolete, and the need to start from scratch.

That I find disturbing. This is the Presidency, NOT The Trump Organization. The conflict of interests concern will only be magnified by this move.

UK: We didn't vote for May but we got her.
US: You didn't vote for Eric but you got him!

http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-t...law-1478895339

Donald, you went off script, the proper Donaldspeak would have been:

Yeah, yeah. I'm not writing a paper for publication.....just a casual post on EF. I think you should worry about more important stuff and avoid talking down to people.

Keeping kids on their parents plans till 26, and no pre- existing conditions are very important, I hope they'll also deal with treatment caps. I have too many friends that will die otherwise.

Fair enough, it's not a big deal for you. That's fine.

Unfortunately, for some people it is a big deal, and we see some people get very angry, aggressive(even here on ef), even violent.
Many of these incidents are based on fact which has slowly been warped from source-to-source, each one trying to out 'viral' the last.

Ever played the game telephone? A lot of the positives and the negatives of both candidates have done a lot of 'telephoning'. Now the US has elected a leader, the least we can do is stay as true to the facts as possible before we attack him.

__________________
"You have reached the end of you free trial membership at BenjaminFranklinQuotes.com" -Benjamin Franklin

I'm really trying to relax about the whole thing. I prefer non violence. And surreal absurdity. And yes, I've played telephone.

Truth be told, keeping kids on till 26, and eliminating pre existing conditions is smart and fairly inexpensive. Will buy him a lot of good will from average folk without chronic disease and will probably keep the swamp things in the GOP from violent action (sorry but the whole drain the swamp crap is so delightful)

Of course I'm in full agreement that those are good points , and he is very smart to keep them in.

I'm just trying to keep it in the right perspective: this is a good thing, and a positive action of the future president. Not, Trump is a terrible presidential elect...look how he flip-flops.

What's your favorite Apprentice episode?

Favorite?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/t...ouse/93646688/

I need a stiff one, I mean a uuuuge one.

And now .... :

Always the optimist, eh? How fortunate you can keep us in The Right Perspective. Well, I think he will be awful, and for all the brave talk of being an outsider, he's in with Guiliani, Gingrich, and the rest plus the medieval Pence.

However, I appreciate and welcome any attempt to adopt reasonable policies. Flip flops are good, if he flops in the appropriate direction.

Happy to say, I've never seen a single episode.

So they'll be a combination of Bush and Kennedy? How delightful - I can see Melania ordering a huge number of Chanel suits...:ROFL:

Definitely will be a good president for the entertainment industry. Never a dull moment guaranteed!

And then there is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/n...cide/93617792/

Probably Trump's main challenge is that the Obamacare legislation is not modular so it may not be possible or extremely difficult to split it up like he is considering.

BTW, one of my tweets posted was "Republican official says...."
I read the WSJ twice but did not find anything about a "Republican official" statements so maybe Chemmie can help me

Not sure who is worse Theresa May or Donald.

May

As I wrote earlier, twitter is a terrible source of single quotes of information.
If you do want some legitimacy, maybe a link to the tweet, who wrote it gives some insight.

First US refugees

Attached Thumbnails

 

Maybe try the Washington Post here