Weekly cage fights between the two?
I don't really see where these two guys share a lot of common ground, so that could be a little problematic.

On Prebius, shows pragmatism. On Bannon, shows loyalty. If either do not work out, they can be replaced.

They could televise the "discussion" weekly. Republican studio wrestling.

Those all happened after I left, so not my concern.

Tom

I wasn't talking to you, Tom...

Presumably, nothing that's happened in the US (or in this case, thousands of kilometres from the US) over the last (quite a) few years concerns you.

"Priebus as Chief of Staff" Safe choice but conflicts with Trump's rhetoric about insiders, dynasties, draining the swamp, etc.

"Mr. Bannon as Strategist/Senior Advisor" No idea of the goals and deliverables of this role so it is hard for me to comment; maybe it is Trump's way of keeping Priebus out of mischief while he fights turf wars with Bannon.

I guess the OP left school before these conflicts started

Leslie Stahl in the 60 minutes interview asked Trump about all the insiders and lobbyists in his transition team. He said that the only people who coukd help right now are insiders, but that once things are going, he'll replace them.

I found his affect fascinating. He talks at people, but not to people. Will this matter? Hopefully not too much, as long as he has good surrogates for diplomacy, etc. He has no attention span to speak of. Will this matter? Again, maybe not.

We'll see what happens, won't we?

The other choice I've been reading about is Ben Carson for sec'y education.

Bye-bye science.

This is really interesting....sort of a synopsis of stuff going on. Might be too biased for some of you.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/1387...rump-apologist

If he ever went to school.

Still laughing.

Two things abhorrent about this:

1. People whingeing on social media about the result; "me me me"
2. People gloating about it: "twat twat twat"

But...one wouldn't be possible without the other.

Not true; I see plenty of gloating without reference to whiny YouTube videos.

Its over-reactive drama intentionally posted for the world to see and react to. Some see tragedy, yet some see comedy.

Some find the downfall of hubris freakin hilarious.

Whereas others find the apparent legitimisation of discrimination "freakin" frightening.

I'd go with Hillarious.

Tom

Simply traded one perception of hubris for another. Will it be different? I guess we will see.

Sorry if this has been mentioned before in this thread (probably can also be pointed out which post, my mommy brain isn't fully working ), some Trump supporters definitely think he would be a good president, as Hillary would make the relationship with Russia even more unbearable. Not sure how Trump would make any difference in this matter.

Exactly, wait and see is the proper attitude.