Breaking news: Avenatti Charged with attempting to extort more than $20 million from Nike...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/s...tion-nike.html

http://www.realclearlife.com/daily-b...-million-nike/

Wow! And he was such a reliable source re Kavanaugh notwithstanding a one-time democratic hopeful (in his own mind that is!) The term "Sleazy Porn Lawyer" makes some sense now. What a degenerate on all levels! And the timing?

Meanwhile in the "real" world!
Source

Seems nobody is perfect

Ughh! Just when I thought it couldn't get uglier, it gets worse:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/25/a...r-cnn-analyst/

A more comprehensive article found here:

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/25/70659...=1553548233542

Haha! Perfect? This guy, Avenatti is a complete sleaze. But many of you defended him re Kavanaugh - despite the writing on the wall

I already posted this! Wake up in the back of the class

Haha! I think I beat you there but we quoted different sources That said, just found this article which goes into more detail:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/avenat...rges-1.5070451

In the well known case of Martha Stewart; she was not found guilty of any crime but found guilty of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statements to a federal investigator.

Thinking about the situation it does not make much sense that Barr decided not to prosecute over obstruction of justice so soon after Mueller reported "While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
It might well be that Mueller had decided that the President committed a crime but his boss Barr blocked him from reporting that. In this case the truth will likely emerge soon!

Very disappointing if true, lets see how many people say 'Who cares? no need for an investigation, put him on the supreme court anyway, ok well if we have to, lets have a thorough investigation you have a week and dont interview him'

This is a bipartisan issue. Investigate both the GOP and the DNC and why not, throw AIPAC in there as well. The results would be shocking and would require a complete reboot of Washingtin D.C. I'm all for it.

A special investigation would be needed just for the State of California. The corruption there runs so deep they dont even bother to hide it anymore. Its like an open book for all to read.


Equality. I'm all for it.

Oh dear, this is awkward.

Charges against Jussie Smollett dropped

Not having the best of days today, are you, Lolz?

Erm, how exactly? The charges being dropped doesn't change the fact that he still did it.

Desperate much?

Just like Trump!

It's quite clear from the report that there is absolutely no evidence that Smollett staged the attack.

But you have to read past the headline to get to that bit, so...

Now you're just bullshitting (again), when you posted that link, all there was was a headline.

And btw, he still did it, despite his lawyers saying there's no evidence.

I wish the BBC could at least try to spell correctly. "Villified". smh.

Oh Lolz, you crack me up! Were you there? Were you one of the men paid to fake the attack?

Speaking of desperation... It must be sad to see your claims of intellectual superiority unravel so comprehensively.

Irony much? that sounds like what one of those lefties you hate would say about Spanky, you should watch what you say or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, a fanatical criminal.

Lolz will be OK. He's acceptable, respectable, presentable... a vegetable.

Are you pleased the charges have been dropped? Do you believe he didn't do it? Or do you really think this is comparable to the Mueller investigation?

Who cares what we, the uninformed, think? What's important is that a judge ruled that there's no case to answer, which leaves Smollett innocent and you and Trump looking foolish. Again.