Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #341  
Old 15.03.2021, 12:08
Talk to you later's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: ZH
Posts: 1,563
Groaned at 71 Times in 37 Posts
Thanked 2,923 Times in 1,058 Posts
Talk to you later has a reputation beyond reputeTalk to you later has a reputation beyond reputeTalk to you later has a reputation beyond reputeTalk to you later has a reputation beyond reputeTalk to you later has a reputation beyond reputeTalk to you later has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Sorry for the drive by post but I don't like manipulative team Meg or Team royalty!
Reply With Quote
  #342  
Old 15.03.2021, 16:42
Newbie 1st class
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Swiss Central
Posts: 21
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
ninoTI has no particular reputation at present
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
I don't see how anyone in their right mind or who considers themselves an even remotely sensible person being could think that was an objective or unbiased interview. The entire charade was designed to provide a sympathetic and biased ear from an interviewer who could make the maximum publicity and impact, or otherwise the Sussexes would not have allowed it to happen. It was pre-emptive PR against the Royals before they were allowed to provide their side of the dstory, plain and simple.
A famous television critic in Italy wrote Meghan Markle interview: brilliant lesson from Oprah Winfrey
Quote:
All those who for business or pleasure love storytelling should memorize the interview that Oprah Winfrey did with Meghan Markle for CBS. It's perfect, it doesn't have a smear: in construction, in choice of topics, in timing of narration. Oprah and Megan are friends (the journalist was invited to the wedding) and neighbors in Santa Barbara. Oprah, knowing that Megan isn't well-liked at Court sensed she had a great story on her hands and didn't let it get away. She took a tall model (Diana's famous BBC interview) and adapted it for the Duchess of Sussex.
...
Oprah is of an exceptional skill, she takes the interviewee by the hand and leads her where she wants: misunderstandings with her sister-in-law Kate, loneliness, thoughts of suicide, until she drops the bombshell that deflagrated all over the media. Someone from the Court, we do not know who, would have expressed concern for the skin of the unborn child.
...
This is Meghan's side of the story, it's not for us to judge. This is Oprah's brilliantly effective lesson.
Reply With Quote
  #343  
Old 15.03.2021, 16:57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geneva
Posts: 463
Groaned at 63 Times in 39 Posts
Thanked 1,341 Times in 747 Posts
Reb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond reputeReb77Br has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Charlie Hebdo has been criticised over that cartoon.

Charlie Hebdo criticised for 'offensive' cartoon of Meghan

Quote:
... Halima Begum, the chief executive of the Runnymede Trust, the UK’s race equality thinktank, said that [the cartoon] was “wrong on every level”.

“The Queen as George Floyd’s murderer crushing Meghan’s neck?” she tweeted. “Meghan saying she’s unable to breathe? This doesn’t push boundaries, make anyone laugh or challenge racism. It demeans the issues and causes offence, across the board.”

... The cartoon also angered some of those fond of the Queen, as she is shown in an extremely derogatory light – red-eyed, gurning, with hairy legs. ...
From TRT World, apparently a Turkish state-owned news channel:

On another expat forum there's a thread on this topic, dominated by American women sympathetic to Harry and Meghan and critical of the royals. One recently posted that anyone denying they're a racist (like Prince William) is therefore a racist [sic]. Another agreed. I can't follow that logic and didn't dare reply, as Brits with royalist tendencies are very much unwanted in the discussion, critics of the Meghan/Harry narrative especially so, but that seems to be where we are now.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank Reb77Br for this useful post:
  #344  
Old 15.03.2021, 17:04
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kt.Zh
Posts: 12,460
Groaned at 490 Times in 405 Posts
Thanked 19,538 Times in 9,887 Posts
greenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond reputegreenmount has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
On another expat forum there's a thread on this topic, dominated by American women sympathetic to Harry and Meghan and critical of the royals. One recently posted that anyone denying they're a racist (like Prince William) is therefore a racist [sic]. I can't follow that logic and didn't dare reply, as Brits with royalist tendencies are very much unwanted in the discussion, critics of Meghan especially so, but that seems to be where we are now.
I think you have a very secure place on EF. We welcome all.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank greenmount for this useful post:
  #345  
Old 15.03.2021, 17:09
Sean Connery's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 5,572
Groaned at 58 Times in 54 Posts
Thanked 7,560 Times in 3,392 Posts
Sean Connery has a reputation beyond reputeSean Connery has a reputation beyond reputeSean Connery has a reputation beyond reputeSean Connery has a reputation beyond reputeSean Connery has a reputation beyond reputeSean Connery has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

the interview is very deliberate. Where there might be some truth in what they said, I am taking it with a pinch of salt with fault on both sides.

I am not a fan of either side.

To add to that, the best woman on Suits was the redhead. Looking, acting, everything
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank Sean Connery for this useful post:
  #346  
Old 15.03.2021, 17:32
Pancakes's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Zurich-ish
Posts: 6,149
Groaned at 397 Times in 294 Posts
Thanked 13,622 Times in 5,209 Posts
Pancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
On another expat forum there's a thread on this topic, dominated by American women sympathetic to Harry and Meghan and critical of the royals. One recently posted that anyone denying they're a racist (like Prince William) is therefore a racist [sic]. Another agreed. I can't follow that logic and didn't dare reply, as Brits with royalist tendencies are very much unwanted in the discussion, critics of the Meghan/Harry narrative especially so, but that seems to be where we are now.
I think there are some Americans (and especially American women) who will quickly and eagerly believe anything they see or hear in an Oprah Winfrey interview.

-----

I don't really have any solid opinions about Meghan or their situation, but I have come across a few articles about Meghan having Narcissistic Personality Disorder and being very controlling of Harry. Of course, I have no idea if that is indeed true, but I do know that playing the victim in order to get attention as well as blame-shifting are things that narcissists often do.

But I can certainly understand if she and Harry don't want to continue to have their lives dictated by a monarchy. Whether or not the accusations of racism were created or exaggerated as a means to try to make them appear justified for leaving the family, I have no idea, and I'm not sure if anyone outside of that situation really knows for sure. But I do wonder if it's ever really crossed Meghan's mind that her having come into Harry's life has torn him away from his family and is now, essentially, trying to tear his family apart in general.

With Oprah... I think it's just all about those ratings. I think she does a good job of simultaneously trying to pretend that she genuinely cares about the people she interviews while also exploiting their personal lives on national television for profit.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Pancakes for this useful post:
  #347  
Old 15.03.2021, 18:05
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,265
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,815 Times in 1,350 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

I donít especially care one way or the other about Meghan as a person, but I see a lot of piling on her as a vicious manipulative woman wrenching Harry away from his loving family. As if. I am an American, and definitely not a royalist, so I donít have the same attachment to these folk as many Brits do. I think Harry wanted to get away from the mess as much as Megan did....i donít think Harry is a weak, easily manipulated creature. Itís convenient to portray him as such because it makes Meghan look even worse.

I donít know about the Royal Family, but I do know that the British press has been quite nasty toward Meghan. Just compare similar headlines and articles about the pregnancies of Catherine and that of Meghan. Motivated by racism? Donít know, but certainly prejudice.

I do know a number of people of color from the UK and many of them seem to believe the Royal Family is racist. I trust a lot of their assessments.

As for Oprah. Sheís not doing a public service. Sheís producing an entertainment program for big ratings and cash.
Reply With Quote
The following 5 users would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #348  
Old 15.03.2021, 20:36
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vaud
Posts: 2,456
Groaned at 175 Times in 122 Posts
Thanked 4,947 Times in 1,902 Posts
Mikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
I donít especially care one way or the other about Meghan as a person, but I see a lot of piling on her as a vicious manipulative woman wrenching Harry away from his loving family. As if. I am an American, and definitely not a royalist, so I donít have the same attachment to these folk as many Brits do. I think Harry wanted to get away from the mess as much as Megan did....i donít think Harry is a weak, easily manipulated creature. Itís convenient to portray him as such because it makes Meghan look even worse.

I donít know about the Royal Family, but I do know that the British press has been quite nasty toward Meghan. Just compare similar headlines and articles about the pregnancies of Catherine and that of Meghan. Motivated by racism? Donít know, but certainly prejudice.

I do know a number of people of color from the UK and many of them seem to believe the Royal Family is racist. I trust a lot of their assessments.

As for Oprah. Sheís not doing a public service. Sheís producing an entertainment program for big ratings and cash.
Yes it is tough when you arenít from the UK yet have to make judgements on whether itís press are prejudiced, which you clearly can.

I find itís the same about America: I know nothing really about the country except that the police beat up black people at will so itís pretty clear the whole country has a bit of a color problem.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Mikers for this useful post:
This user groans at Mikers for this post:
  #349  
Old 15.03.2021, 20:48
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,265
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,815 Times in 1,350 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Yes it is tough when you aren’t from the UK yet have to make judgements on whether it’s press are prejudiced, which you clearly can.

I find it’s the same about America: I know nothing really about the country except that the police beat up black people at will so it’s pretty clear the whole country has a bit of a color problem.
Not tough at all.

Here’s an interesting compilation of headlines comparing Middleton and Markle doing pretty much the same thing.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...tandards-royal


And yes, the US does have a serious issue with race.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #350  
Old 15.03.2021, 20:52
TonyClifton's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Hopefully soon to be Aargau
Posts: 2,286
Groaned at 1,109 Times in 634 Posts
Thanked 5,696 Times in 2,563 Posts
TonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond reputeTonyClifton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
On another expat forum there's a thread on this topic, dominated by American women sympathetic to Harry and Meghan and critical of the royals. One recently posted that anyone denying they're a racist (like Prince William) is therefore a racist [sic]. Another agreed. I can't follow that logic and didn't dare reply, as Brits with royalist tendencies are very much unwanted in the discussion, critics of the Meghan/Harry narrative especially so, but that seems to be where we are now.
One can't follow the logic, because there isn't any. This is Critical Race Theory pure, that at its core is the assumption that all white people are racist. Leave this divisive, dangerous and vile ideology away from Europe.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank TonyClifton for this useful post:
  #351  
Old 15.03.2021, 20:53
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 33,788
Groaned at 2,928 Times in 2,035 Posts
Thanked 41,113 Times in 19,428 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
I find itís the same about America: I know nothing really about the country except that the police beat up black people at will so itís pretty clear the whole country has a bit of a color problem.
Same as most countries then.

Tom
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #352  
Old 15.03.2021, 21:10
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vaud
Posts: 2,456
Groaned at 175 Times in 122 Posts
Thanked 4,947 Times in 1,902 Posts
Mikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Not tough at all.

Hereís an interesting compilation of headlines comparing Middleton and Markle doing pretty much the same thing.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...tandards-royal


And yes, the US does have a serious issue with race.
Good spot, it confirms my thoughts all along: Buzzfeed is clearly a racist news publication.

Now then, who else shall we tar with the brush of racism. Weíve done the royal family and all the press. Perhaps the tories ? Always good to chuck a racism card at the Conservatives.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Mikers for this useful post:
  #353  
Old 15.03.2021, 21:16
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,265
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,815 Times in 1,350 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Good spot, it confirms my thoughts all along: Buzzfeed is clearly a racist news publication.

Now then, who else shall we tar with the brush of racism. Weíve done the royal family and all the press. Perhaps the tories ? Always good to chuck a racism card at the Conservatives.
You seem to be having fun with it.....carry on.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #354  
Old 15.03.2021, 21:31
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Good ole Buzzfeed! Not so sure they are the most objective but which media outlet is nowadays?

https://www.allsides.com/news-source...eed-media-bias

PS..Buzzfeed is decidedly left so of course they would cherry pick sources which reinforce Meghan's "victim" accusation.

Sorry, I have read quite a bit and I am not on Team Meghan.

I think she thought she could change things but had no idea what she was getting into and wanted out once she realized. Now, how to convince Harry?

Mind you, I cannot blame her for wanting out as I would hate that role as well. But I do not buy her "victim" stance. She may have been naive about entering "The Firm" and thought she could change things. But, she is/was no victim.

In fact, I think she accelerated the backlash/criticism to get out. She has her "Prince" and they now have money - more than either would have had before they met each other. Hollywood beckons! Wow! What a fairytale

I should add here that Harry had quite a sum but that involved the constant drudgery of commitments mandated by HRH/The Firm. Now they get to cherry pick which non-profit they will support and at their leisure. Freedom/wealth without duty/responsibility nor service. A win/win!
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #355  
Old 15.03.2021, 21:50
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,265
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,815 Times in 1,350 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Good ole Buzzfeed! Not so sure they are the most objective but which media outlet is nowadays?

https://www.allsides.com/news-source...eed-media-bias

PS..Buzzfeed is decidedly left so of course they would cherry pick sources which reinforce Meghan's "victim" accusation.

Sorry, I have read quite a bit and I am not on Team Meghan.

I think she thought she could change things but had no idea what she was getting into and wanted out once she realized. Now, how to convince Harry?

Mind you, I cannot blame her for wanting out as I would hate that role as well. But I do not buy her "victim" stance. She may have been naive about entering "The Firm" and thought she could change things. But, she is/was no victim.

In fact, I think she accelerated the backlash/criticism to get out. She has her "Prince" and they now have money - more than either would have had before they met each other. Hollywood beckons! Wow! What a fairytale

I should add here that Harry had quite a sum but that involved the constant drudgery of commitments mandated by HRH/The Firm. Now they get to cherry pick which non-profit they will support and at their leisure. Freedom/wealth without duty/responsibility nor service. A win/win!
Buzzfeed curated headlines from UK sources. I donít agree with your assessment.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #356  
Old 15.03.2021, 22:04
Pancakes's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Zurich-ish
Posts: 6,149
Groaned at 397 Times in 294 Posts
Thanked 13,622 Times in 5,209 Posts
Pancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond reputePancakes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

I think it's unfortunate that this has caused so many people to take sides, even going so far as to cause arguments among people. I blame much of that on the media. Many people get their "facts" from the media and then instinctively form and base their opinions on that, when in truth, we rarely know the full scope of a story or situation.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank Pancakes for this useful post:
  #357  
Old 15.03.2021, 22:19
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Buzzfeed curated headlines from UK sources. I don’t agree with your assessment.
But there were other headlines from other UK papers...no??? Headlines they/Buzzfeed specifically chose to cite or ignore to support their narrative.

Such is life with media outlets these days...

Last edited by terrifisch; 15.03.2021 at 22:35.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #358  
Old 15.03.2021, 22:49
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,265
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,815 Times in 1,350 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
But there were other headlines from other UK papers...no??? Headlines they/Buzzfeed specifically chose to cite or ignore to support their narrative.

Such is life with media outlets these days...
Actually, what buzfeed did was to take the same/similar topic, from the same source and show the headline and story as it referred to Middleton and to Markle. It demonstrates bias within the source (like the examiner, daily mail and so on).

To be honest though, this is way more time than anyone needs to spend on this crap.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #359  
Old 15.03.2021, 23:09
Island Monkey's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wallis
Posts: 7,462
Groaned at 170 Times in 104 Posts
Thanked 8,749 Times in 3,914 Posts
Island Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
C
On another expat forum there's a thread on this topic, dominated by American women sympathetic to Harry and Meghan and critical of the royals. One recently posted that anyone denying they're a racist (like Prince William) is therefore a racist [sic]. Another agreed. I can't follow that logic and didn't dare reply, as Brits with royalist tendencies are very much unwanted in the discussion, critics of the Meghan/Harry narrative especially so, but that seems to be where we are now.
I am all for calling out racism where racism exists. But it is now fashionable in woke culture to call racism even when it doesn't exist and make genuinely nice moderate people feel like shit. The result being nice moderate people feel like they can't say anything, ask questions or debate. I can't see long term how this will be good for reducing racism at all.
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank Island Monkey for this useful post:
  #360  
Old 15.03.2021, 23:30
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Actually, what buzfeed did was to take the same/similar topic, from the same source and show the headline and story as it referred to Middleton and to Markle. It demonstrates bias within the source (like the examiner, daily mail and so on).

To be honest though, this is way more time than anyone needs to spend on this crap.
I don't agree that Meghan was a victim; so let's agree to disagree if that is possible
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Harry and the Queen drop the mic: The Invictus Challenge olygirl International affairs/politics 0 30.04.2016 09:32
On Prince Harry's Naked Antics - Disgraceful or Awesome? Guest International affairs/politics 82 30.08.2012 12:40
Nasty Prince Harry? hoppy International affairs/politics 34 07.09.2010 14:25
Racist prince harry uses the p-word martin34 International affairs/politics 62 17.01.2009 12:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0