Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 30.11.2017, 12:15
Blueangel's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 3,993
Groaned at 113 Times in 101 Posts
Thanked 10,731 Times in 4,731 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
" rum bugger ". Could explain your own tentencies then

1. I've never been head of the W.I. and a reknowned & respected 'old woman of the CofE High Church'.
2. I've never gone on a work trip and got pregnant by a guy young enough to be my son.

I think she beats me hands down in the rum bugger department.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Blueangel for this useful post:
  #82  
Old 30.11.2017, 15:07
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CH
Posts: 10,975
Groaned at 2,037 Times in 1,121 Posts
Thanked 5,139 Times in 3,246 Posts
omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Guess you have time to catch up
Quote:
View Post

1. I've never been head of the W.I. and a reknowned & respected 'old woman of the CofE High Church'.
2. I've never gone on a work trip and got pregnant by a guy young enough to be my son.

I think she beats me hands down in the rum bugger department.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank omtatsat for this useful post:
  #83  
Old 30.11.2017, 15:31
curley's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: canton ZH
Posts: 12,593
Groaned at 206 Times in 171 Posts
Thanked 14,389 Times in 7,438 Posts
curley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Hopefully, they are labelled as people, and as for those damned boxes, I've refused to tick them for over 30yrs now. some companies get their knickers in a twist over my refusal, but stuff them. My race has nothing whatsoever to do with 99% of transactions with the people that ask that question, so stuff the lot of them.
Are you saying, there are companies who ask for one's race in their questionaries? Where? In GB?
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 30.11.2017, 15:33
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CH
Posts: 10,975
Groaned at 2,037 Times in 1,121 Posts
Thanked 5,139 Times in 3,246 Posts
omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

probably in Australia
Quote:
View Post
Are you saying, there are companies who ask for one's race in their questionaries? Where? In GB?
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:19
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CH
Posts: 10,975
Groaned at 2,037 Times in 1,121 Posts
Thanked 5,139 Times in 3,246 Posts
omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat omtatsat
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

The " royal family " are parasites.
Quote:
View Post
She is also fairly liberal, which has also upset the likes of the Mail and Express and their commentardiat. For instance the lovely Brendan O'Neill has got a bit triggered in the Spectator:



(I wish there was a way to resize images, sorry about that mods.)
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:20
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 31,558
Groaned at 2,347 Times in 1,708 Posts
Thanked 38,350 Times in 18,099 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
The " royal family " are parasites.
Aren't all rich people?

Tom
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #87  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:21
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Are you saying, there are companies who ask for one's race in their questionaries? Where? In GB?
Yup. It's part of their "equal opportunity" monitoring.

I find it a bit sinister myself.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #88  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:24
Tom1234's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kanton Luzern
Posts: 15,769
Groaned at 522 Times in 414 Posts
Thanked 23,265 Times in 9,399 Posts
Tom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Aren't all rich people?

Tom
Not if the create employment for others.

The Royal family help boost Britain's foreign tourist industry. They are a huge draw.

You Americans apparently love that sort of thing and come over in your droves to marvel at our palaces, castles and pageantry.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Tom1234 for this useful post:
  #89  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:25
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
The " royal family " are parasites.
Nah, they're not. The Crown Estate pays a lot more into the treasury than the queen gets back. As far as I'm aware the rest of the family are independently wealthy and most of them have jobs too.

I'm no supporter of the monarchy, but it does offer value for money when compared to a presidential system - in the UK at least.

I've no idea why you lot haven't ditched the queen, though. You're like a bunch of teenagers: happy to whinge about mummy, but still want your washing done at the weekend.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #90  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:50
Medea Fleecestealer's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 22,121
Groaned at 406 Times in 315 Posts
Thanked 17,092 Times in 9,616 Posts
Medea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
Nah, they're not. The Crown Estate pays a lot more into the treasury than the queen gets back. As far as I'm aware the rest of the family are independently wealthy and most of them have jobs too.

I'm no supporter of the monarchy, but it does offer value for money when compared to a presidential system - in the UK at least.

I've no idea why you lot haven't ditched the queen, though. You're like a bunch of teenagers: happy to whinge about mummy, but still want your washing done at the weekend.
Why would we? Then we'd end up with people like Trump, Mugabe, Edrogen, etc, in charge.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 30.11.2017, 16:55
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Why would we? Then we'd end up with people like Trump, Mugabe, Edrogen, etc, in charge.
I didn't know you were Australian?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #92  
Old 30.11.2017, 17:10
curley's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: canton ZH
Posts: 12,593
Groaned at 206 Times in 171 Posts
Thanked 14,389 Times in 7,438 Posts
curley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Why would we? Then we'd end up with people like Trump, Mugabe, Edrogen, etc, in charge.
As an outsider I don't have the impression the queen is really in charge of running the country.
On the other hand it would support DB's mummy-theory: She patiently watches the children's headless trials at politics. LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 30.11.2017, 17:55
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Nyon
Posts: 993
Groaned at 15 Times in 14 Posts
Thanked 1,104 Times in 533 Posts
Rachel Moore has a reputation beyond reputeRachel Moore has a reputation beyond reputeRachel Moore has a reputation beyond reputeRachel Moore has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
I've no idea why you lot haven't ditched the queen, though. You're like a bunch of teenagers: happy to whinge about mummy, but still want your washing done at the weekend.
What? Like a Peasants Revolt?
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 30.11.2017, 18:03
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 31,558
Groaned at 2,347 Times in 1,708 Posts
Thanked 38,350 Times in 18,099 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Why would we? Then we'd end up with people like Trump, Mugabe, Edrogen, etc, in charge.
You forgot May, Corbin, etc.

Tom
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #95  
Old 30.11.2017, 19:05
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
What? Like a Peasants Revolt?
Australia is already independent. It shouldn't be too difficult to ditch a foreign monarch and become a republic. They just don't seem to want to.

There's no hope for Britain.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #96  
Old 30.11.2017, 19:07
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
I didn't know you were Australian?
Sadly deceased a few years ago- the brother of an ex colleague was the staunchiest anti Royalist - and the righful direct descendant to the Throne
(Hastings from Ashby de la Zouch) had the succession not been repeatedly tampered with.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...Australia.html
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 30.11.2017, 19:09
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
Sadly deceased a few years ago- the brother of an ex colleague was the staunchiest anti Royalist - and the righful direct descendant to the Throne
(Hastings from Ashby de la Zouch) had the succession not been repeatedly tampered with.
I take issue with the concept of "rightful". They should all stand aside and let the people choose their head of state.

Trump is a dick, but after four years he can be booted out of office.

Edit: I just read your post properly - brilliant stuff!
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #98  
Old 30.11.2017, 19:11
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

lol agreed his sister was huge fun, very discreet about her origins and being a Peer of the Realm and taught in a comprehensive school in Leicester.

Last edited by Odile; 30.11.2017 at 20:34.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 01.12.2017, 00:22
Blueangel's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 3,993
Groaned at 113 Times in 101 Posts
Thanked 10,731 Times in 4,731 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Are you saying, there are companies who ask for one's race in their questionaries? Where? In GB?
Loads, and I believe the question is still on the Census. There's all the usual options, then one names 'Other...' where I used to write 'Not applicable', but now I write 'None of your business'. Brits tend to be good at dealing with crap like this, which is why Jedi is now on the Census list and also how Rage Against The Machine - 'Killing In The Name' became the Christmas 2009 No.1.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1589133.stm
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 01.12.2017, 07:05
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Are you saying, there are companies who ask for one's race in their questionaries? Where? In GB?
Oh, it gets far better than that:

Reply With Quote
The following 5 users would like to thank for this useful post:
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Harry and the Queen drop the mic: The Invictus Challenge olygirl International affairs/politics 0 30.04.2016 09:32
On Prince Harry's Naked Antics - Disgraceful or Awesome? Guest International affairs/politics 82 30.08.2012 12:40
Nasty Prince Harry? hoppy International affairs/politics 34 07.09.2010 14:25
Racist prince harry uses the p-word martin34 International affairs/politics 62 17.01.2009 12:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0