Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 21.02.2020, 20:48
Medea Fleecestealer's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 22,121
Groaned at 406 Times in 315 Posts
Thanked 17,092 Times in 9,616 Posts
Medea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Going to have to drop their SussexRoyal idea. Not allowed.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51593708

Beeb slow on the uptake. Bluewin had this yesterday.

https://www.bluewin.ch/fr/divertisse...an-359731.html
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 21.02.2020, 21:00
Island Monkey's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wallis
Posts: 5,730
Groaned at 95 Times in 60 Posts
Thanked 6,281 Times in 2,875 Posts
Island Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Going to have to drop their SussexRoyal idea. Not allowed.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51593708

Beeb slow on the uptake. Bluewin had this yesterday.

https://www.bluewin.ch/fr/divertisse...an-359731.html
Good!!
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 21.02.2020, 21:09
3Wishes's Avatar
Moderately Amused
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bern area
Posts: 11,139
Groaned at 86 Times in 82 Posts
Thanked 18,800 Times in 8,379 Posts
3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Going to have to drop their SussexRoyal idea. Not allowed.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51593708

Beeb slow on the uptake. Bluewin had this yesterday.

https://www.bluewin.ch/fr/divertisse...an-359731.html
It makes sense. Either you're a Royal with all that goes with it, or you're not. They wanted it both ways. I can't blame them too much though. No one has ever tried to step away in such a manner so they're in uncharted territory.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 21.02.2020, 22:24
Medea Fleecestealer's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 22,121
Groaned at 406 Times in 315 Posts
Thanked 17,092 Times in 9,616 Posts
Medea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond reputeMedea Fleecestealer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
It makes sense. Either you're a Royal with all that goes with it, or you're not. They wanted it both ways. I can't blame them too much though. No one has ever tried to step away in such a manner so they're in uncharted territory.
Exactly. I think they were naive to think they could just hop in and out as they pleased, yet trade on the royalty part.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank Medea Fleecestealer for this useful post:
  #125  
Old 21.02.2020, 22:50
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

I am really wondering about them as a couple. Meghan (or MeGain as the Brits call her) had zero clue when she married Harry and thought she could project her "vision" onto the monarchy. Think again Meghan - It is an institution and beyond your control. That said, she has Harry under her thumb as well as Archie - which does give her some leverage. Troubling times for the monarchy given Andrew, divorces etc...

I personally feel very sorry for the Queen
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 22.02.2020, 12:55
Blueangel's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Küsnacht, Switzerland
Posts: 3,993
Groaned at 113 Times in 101 Posts
Thanked 10,731 Times in 4,731 Posts
Blueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond reputeBlueangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

It always strikes me as peculiar when people go after her and never wonder about him. Top and bottom is that it's none of my business, but I do wonder if he's been planning this for years, long before he even met his wife. What if it was part of 'the deal' that she take the flak for a while whilst he plotted his life change... I wish them both all the luck, love and happiness that I would wish to any couple who have done me no harm.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank Blueangel for this useful post:
  #127  
Old 12.03.2020, 08:13
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zurich
Posts: 13,254
Groaned at 1,184 Times in 785 Posts
Thanked 19,117 Times in 7,416 Posts
Chuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Say what you like about the British royals but I can't help but feel sorry for Harry at the moment. The DM has published VERY in-depth details of the prank call where he revealed far more than he should have about his life and thoughts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Thunberg.html

This should never have happened and it shows that Harry is vulnerable, impressionable, gullible and having mental health problems and I fear this will help to tip him over the edge into some form of deeper anxiety or depression.

Last edited by Chuff; 12.03.2020 at 08:29. Reason: Typo
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Chuff for this useful post:
  #128  
Old 12.03.2020, 10:04
olygirl's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: d' Innerschwiiz
Posts: 7,028
Groaned at 349 Times in 233 Posts
Thanked 16,619 Times in 5,087 Posts
olygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

I thought his replies in the article were quite sensible.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 12.03.2020, 10:05
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zurich
Posts: 13,254
Groaned at 1,184 Times in 785 Posts
Thanked 19,117 Times in 7,416 Posts
Chuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
I thought his replies in the article were quite sensible.
*nods slowly*
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 12.03.2020, 10:20
olygirl's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: d' Innerschwiiz
Posts: 7,028
Groaned at 349 Times in 233 Posts
Thanked 16,619 Times in 5,087 Posts
olygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
*nods slowly*
What was out of line, then?
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 12.03.2020, 10:32
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zurich
Posts: 13,254
Groaned at 1,184 Times in 785 Posts
Thanked 19,117 Times in 7,416 Posts
Chuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
What was out of line, then?
I don't have the time of patience to explain to you why it is horribly embarrassing for him so I suggest you google the many articles analyzing it in detail.
Reply With Quote
This user groans at Chuff for this post:
  #132  
Old 12.03.2020, 11:06
Ato Ato is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: ZH
Posts: 1,472
Groaned at 15 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 2,717 Times in 1,103 Posts
Ato has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

It doesn't read badly for an off the cuff phonecall. I can understand that the royals are meant to see infallible but this phonecall appears to be blown out of proportion.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 12.03.2020, 11:37
olygirl's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: d' Innerschwiiz
Posts: 7,028
Groaned at 349 Times in 233 Posts
Thanked 16,619 Times in 5,087 Posts
olygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
I don't have the time of patience to explain to you why it is horribly embarrassing for him so I suggest you google the many articles analyzing it in detail.
But you had the time to post the article...
Reply With Quote
This user groans at olygirl for this post:
  #134  
Old 12.03.2020, 11:51
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 8,273
Groaned at 294 Times in 223 Posts
Thanked 18,937 Times in 6,603 Posts
k_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond reputek_and_e has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
I thought his replies in the article were quite sensible.
I agree. The embarrassing part is mostly that it was a prank.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 12.03.2020, 12:08
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

My first thought was that it was all fake but, that being the case, you would have thought that a statement would have been issued by now that it wasn't Harry.


My second thought was how did the pranksters get the phone number. Some worrying security breaches there. The Daily Mail is a disgusting excuse for a newspaper but then so are all the UK tabloids. Aren't there laws about recording conversations without consent and publishing details?
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 12.03.2020, 12:24
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zurich
Posts: 13,254
Groaned at 1,184 Times in 785 Posts
Thanked 19,117 Times in 7,416 Posts
Chuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
My first thought was that it was all fake but, that being the case, you would have thought that a statement would have been issued by now that it wasn't Harry.

My second thought was how did the pranksters get the phone number. Some worrying security breaches there.
I don't see how it won't have been Harry. It's clear that his split from the palace will significantly reduce his security levels and when combined with his current vulnerability this is extremely worrying. This is a huge embarrassment for him and the things he said about politicians will not be forgotten and will harm his and Meghan's reputation as well as affect the rest of the royal family. He is likely going to pretty emotionally devastated by this humiliation.

Quote:
View Post
The Daily Mail is a disgusting excuse for a newspaper but then so are all the UK tabloids. Aren't there laws about recording conversations without consent and publishing details?
Yup, the DM is the most frequently insidious and heinous rag of all of ourUK tabloids, but it exists and makes its huge impact felt so cannot and should not be ignored. Considering that the Russian pranksters recorded the calls and published them I am not sure what can be done.

Last edited by Chuff; 12.03.2020 at 12:37.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 12.03.2020, 13:56
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Formerly in Neuchatel
Posts: 3,031
Groaned at 232 Times in 159 Posts
Thanked 5,842 Times in 2,145 Posts
porsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond reputeporsch1909 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Seems a bit peculiar he would have such in depth discussions with a 17 year old girl like that to begin with.

He does seem a few chips short of a happy meal
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank porsch1909 for this useful post:
  #138  
Old 08.03.2021, 09:24
olygirl's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: d' Innerschwiiz
Posts: 7,028
Groaned at 349 Times in 233 Posts
Thanked 16,619 Times in 5,087 Posts
olygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond reputeolygirl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Reviving because of the interview.

Take aways from the interview with Oprah:

- the firm is bad
- don't ever mention a child's possible skin colour
- Meghan was suicidal
- Harry's a decent guy
- Charles can be a dick
- The queen is lovely
- Harry and Meghan aren't that rich (apart from the 30 million dollars he received from his mother)
- Charles, William and Kate are trapped
- The firm spreads lies or doesn't counteract them.

Did I miss anything?
Reply With Quote
The following 6 users would like to thank olygirl for this useful post:
  #139  
Old 08.03.2021, 09:29
Island Monkey's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wallis
Posts: 5,730
Groaned at 95 Times in 60 Posts
Thanked 6,281 Times in 2,875 Posts
Island Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond reputeIsland Monkey has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Lots of people screaming that the Royal family’s treatment of Meghan is racist, whilst also screaming that she was treated exactly the same as her white mother in law Diana
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank Island Monkey for this useful post:
  #140  
Old 08.03.2021, 09:29
Ato Ato is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: ZH
Posts: 1,472
Groaned at 15 Times in 15 Posts
Thanked 2,717 Times in 1,103 Posts
Ato has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond reputeAto has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [Prince] Harry and Meghan

Quote:
View Post
Reviving because of the interview.

Take aways from the interview with Oprah:

- the firm is bad
- don't ever mention a child's possible skin colour
- Meghan was suicidal
- Harry's a decent guy
- Charles can be a dick
- The queen is lovely
- Harry and Meghan aren't that rich (apart from the 30 million dollars he received from his mother)
- Charles, William and Kate are trapped
- The firm spreads lies or doesn't counteract them.

Did I miss anything?
- Nobody is suprised by any of these revelations
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Ato for this useful post:
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Harry and the Queen drop the mic: The Invictus Challenge olygirl International affairs/politics 0 30.04.2016 09:32
On Prince Harry's Naked Antics - Disgraceful or Awesome? Guest International affairs/politics 82 30.08.2012 12:40
Nasty Prince Harry? hoppy International affairs/politics 34 07.09.2010 14:25
Racist prince harry uses the p-word martin34 International affairs/politics 62 17.01.2009 12:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0